Membrane and Water Treatment

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Membrane engineering progresses in desalination and water reuse

  • Macedonio, Francesca (Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials, University of Calabria) ;
  • Drioli, Enrico (Institute on Membrane Technology, ITM-CNR, c/o University of Calabria)
  • Received : 2009.09.24
  • Accepted : 2009.10.20
  • Published : 2010.01.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this work is to analyse and discuss the use of the Economic Evaluation and of some new "metrics" for an appropriate valuation of membrane operations in the logic of Process Intensification. In particular, the proposed approach has the goal to show how the utilized indicators can drive to the choice of the most convenient process. Although in this work the planned procedure is applied, as a case study, to the membrane-based systems for boron and arsenic removal from waters, the suggested approach can be generally applied to any other process of interest.

Keywords

References

  1. Brandhuber, P. and Amy, G. (1998), "Alternative methods for membrane filtration of arsenic from drinking water", Desalination, 117, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00061-7
  2. Charpentier, J.C. (2005), "Four main objectives for the future of chemical and process engineering mainly concerned by the science and technologies of new materials production", Chem. Eng. J., 107, 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2004.12.004
  3. Charpentier, J.C. (2007), "Modern Chemical Engineering in the Framework of Globalization, Sustainability, and Technical Innovation", Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46, 3465-3485. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie061290g
  4. Constable, D.J.C., Curzons, A.D. and Cunningham, V.L. (2002), "Metrics to 'green' chemistry-which are the best?", Green Chem., 4, 521-527. https://doi.org/10.1039/b206169b
  5. Criscuoli, A. and Drioli, E. (2007), "New metrics for evaluating the performance of membrane operations in the logic of process intensification", Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46, 2268-2271. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0610952
  6. Curzons, A.D., Constable, D.J.C., Mortimer, D.N. and Cunningham, V.L. (2001), "So you think your process is green, how do you know?-Using principles of sustainability to determine what is green-a corporate perspective", Green Chem., 3, 1-6.
  7. Drioli, E. and Curcio, E. (2007), "Membrane engineering for process intensification: a perspective", J. Chem. Technol. Biot., 82(3), 223-227 https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1650
  8. Drioli, E. and Romano, M. (2001), "Progress and new perspectives on integrated membrane operations for sustainable industrial growth", Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40, 1277-1300. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0006209
  9. Jimenez-Gonzalez, C., Constable, D.J.C., Curzons, A.D. and Cunningham, V.L. (2002), "Developing GSK's green technology guidance: methodology for case-scenario comparison of technologies", Clean Tech. Environ Policy, 4, 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-001-0134-7
  10. Macedonio, F. and Drioli, E. (2008), "Pressure-driven membrane operations and membrane distillation technology integration for water purification", Desalination, 223, 396-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.200
  11. Redondo, J., Busch, M. and De Witte, J.P. (2003), "Boron removal from seawater using FILMTECTM high rejection SWRO membranes", Desalination, 156, 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00345-X
  12. Sato, Y., Kang, M., Kamei, T. and Magara, Y. (2002), "Performance of nanofiltration for arsenic removal", Water Res., 36, 3371- 3377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00037-4
  13. Tomi, Y., et. al. (2005), "Evolution of RO Membrane for Seawater Desalination", Proc. of Int. Forum on Water Industry Qingdao, 2005, China, July 2005, pp. 92-97.
  14. Urase, T., Oh, J.I. and Yamamoto, K. (1998), "Effect of pH on rejection of different species of arsenic by nanofiltration", Desalination, 117, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00062-9
  15. Vrijenhoek, E.M. and Waypa, J.J. (2000), "Arsenic removal from drinking water by a "loose" nanofiltration membrane", Desalination, 130, 262-277.

Cited by

  1. A scaling mitigation approach during direct contact membrane distillation vol.80, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.05.013
  2. Evolution with Time of Hydrophobicity and Microrelief of a Cation-Exchange Membrane Surface and Its Impact on Overlimiting Mass Transfer vol.116, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2101896
  3. Potable water recovery from As, U, and F contaminated ground waters by direct contact membrane distillation process vol.192, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.056
  4. Hierarchical prioritization of innovative treatment systems for sustainable dairy wastewater management vol.112, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.107
  5. Membrane Technology for Water Treatment vol.33, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201000139
  6. Techno-economic viability of innovative membrane systems in water and mass recovery from dairy wastewater vol.458, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.058
  7. Treatment of saline aqueous solutions using direct contact membrane distillation vol.32, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2011.2705
  8. Water desalination and dyes separation from industrial wastewater by PES/TiO2NTs mixed matrix membranes vol.26, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-019-1831-4