DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Comparison of 3 Different Isolation Media of Cronobacter sakazakii

Cronobacter sakazakii 분리배지의 성능 비교

  • 김현정 (한국식품연구원 안전성연구단) ;
  • 구민선 (한국식품연구원 안전성연구단) ;
  • 오세욱 (국민대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2010.01.25
  • Accepted : 2010.03.15
  • Published : 2010.05.31

Abstract

Three different isolation media for Cronobacter sakazakii have been recommended by Korea Food and Drug Administration from 2007. Performance comparison test was carried out between recommended Cronobacter sakazakii isolation medium. Chromogenic Enterobacter sakazakii agar (CESA) and Enterobacter sakazakii agar (ESA) produce more distinctive colonies having characteristic colors and appearance than Violet red bile glucose agar (VRBGA). The sensitivity and specificity of 3 different isolation media was checked. All 3 tested media showed 100% sensitivity when tested with 30 different Cronobacter sakazakii. The CESA and ESA showed 100% specificity when tested with Enterobacteriaceae except Cronobacter sakazakii, However, VRBGA did not show any specificity, showing inadequate selectivity compared to applicable Cronobacter sakazakii isolation medium. Artificially inoculated Cronobacter sakazakii to milk powder was easily recovered with 3 different isolation media and they all showed almost the same recovery activity.

식품공전에 Cronobacter sakazakii 분리배지로 등재되어 있는 3종의 분리배지에 대한 평가실험을 실시하였다. Chromogenic Enterobacter sakazakii agar, Enterobacter sakazakii agar가 VRBG agar에 비하여 뚜렷한 색택과 모양의 집락을 생성하였다. 3종의 분리배지 모두 30종의 Cronobacter sakazakii에 대한 sensitivity가 100%로 측정되었지만 Cronobacter sakazakii 이외의 Enterobacteriaceae 균주를 이용한 specificity 실험에서는 Chromogenic Enterobacter sakazakii agar, Enterobacter sakazakii agar가 100%로 측정되었지만 VRBG agar는 0%로 측정되었다. 인위적으로 접종한 식품에서의 회수율은 실험에 공시된 3종 배지에서 커다란 차이가 없었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bar-Oz B, Preminger A, Peleg O, Block C, Arad I. 2001. Enterobacter sakazakii infection in the newborn. Acta Paediatr 90: 356-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/080352501300067857
  2. Biering G, Karlsson S, Clark NC, Jonsdottir KE, Ludvigsson P, Steingrimsson O. 1989. Three cases of neonatal meningitis caused by Enterobacter sakazakii in powdered milk. J Clin Microbiol 27: 2054-2056.
  3. Nazarowec-White M, Farber JM. 1997. Incidence, survival, and growth of Enterobacter sakazakii in infant formula. J Food Prot 60: 226-230. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-60.3.226
  4. Clark NC, Hill BC, O'Hara CM, Steingrimsson O, Cooksey RC. 1990. Epidemiologic typing of Enterobacter sakazakii in two neonatal nosocomial outbreaks. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 13: 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(90)90078-A
  5. Van Acker, de Smet F, Muyldermans G, Bougatef A, Naessens A, Lauwers S. 2001. Outbreak of necrotizing enterocolitis associated with Enterobacter sakazakii in powdered milk formula. J Clin Microbiol 39: 293-297. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.1.293-297.2001
  6. Farmer JJ, Asbury MA, Hickman FW, Brenner DJ, the Enterobacteriaceae Study Group. 1980. Enterobacter sakazakii, new species of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol 30: 569-584. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-3-569
  7. Kandhai MC, Reij MW, Gorris LG, Guillaume-Gentil O, van Schothorst M. 2004. Occurrence of Enterobacter sakazakii in food production environments and households. Lancet 363: 39-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15169-0
  8. Muytjens HL, Roelofs WH, Jaspar GHJ. 1988. Quality of powdered substitutes for breast milk with regard to members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 26: 743-746.
  9. Jin Seong Uni-Tech. 2007. Food-borne pathogens. Handbook, Seoul, Korea. p 491-498.
  10. Gurtler JB, Beuchat LR. 2005. Performance of media for recovering stressed cells of Enterobacter sakazakii as determined using spiral plating and ecometric techniques. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 7661-7669. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.7661-7669.2005
  11. Hawkins RE, Lissner CR, Sanford JP. 1991. Enterobacter sakazakii bacteremia in an adult. South Med J 84: 793-795. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-199106000-00033
  12. Lai KK. 2001. Enterobacter sakazakii infections among neonates, infants, children, and adults: case reports and a review of the literature. Medicine 80: 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005792-200103000-00004
  13. Simmons BP, Gelfand MS, Haas M, Metts L, Ferguson J. 1989. Enterobacter sakazakii infections in neonates associated with intrinsic contamination of a powdered infant formula. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 10: 398-401. https://doi.org/10.1086/646060
  14. Korea Food & Drug Administration. 2008. Food code. Seoul, Korea.
  15. European Commission. 2005. Commission regulation (EC) number 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Official J Eur Union L 338: 1-26.
  16. Iversen C, Druggan P, Forsythe SJ. 2004. A selective differential medium for Enterobacter sakazakii. a preliminary study. Int J Food Microbiol 96: 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.01.024
  17. Oh SW, Kang DH. 2004. Fluorogenic selective and differential medium for isolation of Enterobacter sakazakii. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 5692-5694. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.9.5692-5694.2004
  18. Iversen C, Forsythe SJ. 2007. Comparison of media for the isolation of Enterobacter sakazakii. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01562-06
  19. Cooke, VM, Miles RJ, Rrice RG, Richardson AC. 1999. A novel chromogenic ester agar medium for detection of Salmonellae. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 807-812.
  20. Manafi M, Kremsmaier B. 2001. Comparative evaluation of different chromogenic/fluorogenic media for detecting Escherichia coli O157:H7 in food. Int J Food Microbiol 71: 257-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00610-9
  21. Weagant SD, Bound AJ. 2001. Evaluation of techniques for enrichment and isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from artificially contaminated sprouts. Int J Food Microbiol 71: 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00558-X

Cited by

  1. Comparative Evaluation of Selective Chromogenic Media for Coliforms Bacteria Isolated from Food vol.31, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2016.31.3.222
  2. Current Cronobacter spp. Researches on Prevalence, Control, and Detection vol.48, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7845/kjm.2012.051