Journal of Gastric Cancer

The Korean Gastric Cancer Association (대한위암학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microsatellite Instability Is Associated with the Clinicopathologic Features of Gastric Cancer in Sporadic Gastric Cancer Patients

  • Kim, Shin-Hyuk (Department of Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Byung-Kyu (Department of Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Nam, Young-Su (Department of Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Pyo, Joo-Youn (Department of Pathology, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Young-Ha (Department of Pathology, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Kang-Hong (Department of Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2010.06.18
  • Accepted : 2010.09.15
  • Published : 2010.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Replication error is an important mechanism in carcinogenesis. The microsatellite instability (MSI-H) of colorectal cancers is associated with the development of multiple cancers. The influence of MSI-H on the development of multiple gastric cancers in sporadic gastric cancer patients has not been defined. This study was performed to reveal the association between the clinicopathologic features and MSI in sporadic gastric cancers. Materials and Methods: Between July 2004 and March 2009, the clinicopathologic characteristics, including MSI status, were evaluated in 128 consecutive patients with sporadic gastric cancers. None of the patients had hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer of familial gastric cancer. The markers that were recommended by the NCI to determine the MSI status for colorectal cancers were used Results: MSI-H cancers were found in 10.9% of the patients (14/128). Synchronous gastric cancers were shown in 4 patients (3.1%). Synchronous cancers were found in 2 of 14 patients with MSI-H gastric cancer (14.3%) and 2 of 114 patients with MSS gastric cancer (1.8%; P=0.059, Fisher's exact test). Among the patients with synchronous cancer 50% (2/4) had MSI-H cancer, but 9.7% of the patients (12/124) without synchronous cancer had MSI-H cancer. MSI-H (RR, 24.7; 95% CI, 1.5~398.9; P=0.024) was related with to synchronous gastric cancer, but age, gender, family history, histologic type, location, gross morphology, size, and stage were not related to synchronous gastric cancer. Conclusions: MSI is associated with the intestinal-type gastric cancer and the presence of multiple gastric cancers in patients with sporadic gastric cancer. Special attention to the presence of synchronous and the development of metachronous multiple cancer in patients with MSI-H gastric cancer is needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Pedroni M, Tamassia MG, Percesepe A, Roncucci L, Benatti P, Lanza G Jr, et al. Microsatellite instability in multiple colorectal tumors. Int J Cancer 1999;81:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990331)81:1<1::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO;2-K
  2. Sengupta SB, Yiu CY, Boulos PB, De Silva M, Sams VR, Delhanty JD. Genetic instability in patients with metachronous colorectal cancers. Br J Surg 1997;84:996-1000. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800840725
  3. Bae JM, Won YJ, Jung KW, Suh KA, Ahn DH, Park JG. Annual report of the central cancer registry in Korea-1999: based on registered data from 128 hospitals. Cancer Res Treat 2001;33:367-372. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2001.33.5.367
  4. Honmyo U, Misumi A, Murakami A, Haga Y, Akagi M. Clinicopathological analysis of synchronous multiple gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 1989;15:316-321.
  5. Kaibara N, Maeta M, Ikeguchi M. Patients with multiple primary gastric cancers tend to develop second primaries in organs other than the stomach. Surg Today 1993;23:186-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311241
  6. Lynch HT, Smyrk TC, Watson P, Lanspa SJ, Lynch JF, Lynch PM, et al. Genetics, natural history, tumor spectrum, and pathology of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an updated review. Gastroenterology 1993;104:1535-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(93)90368-M
  7. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classifi cation of gastric carcinoma - 2nd english edition -. Gastric Cancer 1998;1:10-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011681
  8. Lauren P. The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a HISTO-clinical classifi cation. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1965;64:31-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.1965.64.1.31
  9. Cleary JB, Kazarian KK, Mersheimer WL. Multiple primary cancer. Th irty patients with three or more primary cancers. Am J Surg 1975;129:686-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(75)90346-3
  10. Suraweera N, Duval A, Reperant M, Vaury C, Furlan D, Leroy K, et al. Evaluation of tumor microsatellite instability using five quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats and pentaplex PCR. Gastroenterology 2002;123:1804-1811. https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2002.37070
  11. Boland CR, Th ibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, Sidransky D, Eshleman JR, Burt RW, et al. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998;58:5248-5257.
  12. Ahn YJ, Oh SJ, Song JW, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, et al. The clinicopathologic features and prognosis of multiple early gastric cancer. J Korean Gastric Cancer Assoc 2008;8:198-203. https://doi.org/10.5230/jkgca.2008.8.4.198
  13. Ribeiro U Jr, Jorge UM, Safatle-Ribeiro AV, Yagi OK, Scapulatempo C, Perez RO, et al. Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemistry characterization of synchronous multiple primary gastric adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:233-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0101-7
  14. Bae JS, Lee JH, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Bae JM. Characteristics of synchronous cancers in gastric cancer patients. Cancer Res Treat 2006;38:25-29. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2006.38.1.25
  15. Tahara E. Molecular mechanism of stomach carcinogenesis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1993;119:265-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01212724
  16. Chong JM, Fukayama M, Hayashi Y, Takizawa T, Koike M, Konishi M, et al. Microsatellite instability in the progression of gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res 1994;54:4595-4597.
  17. Sepulveda AR, Santos AC, Yamaoka Y, Wu L, Gutierrez O, Kim JG, et al. Marked diff erences in the frequency of microsatellite instability in gastric cancer from diff erent countries. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:3034-3038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01453.x
  18. Lim S, Lee HS, Kim HS, Kim YI, Kim WH. Alteration of Ecadherin-mediated adhesion protein is common, but microsatellite instability is uncommon in young age gastric cancers. Histopathology 2003;42:128-136. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01546.x
  19. Hayden JD, Cawkwell L, Quirke P, Dixon MF, Goldstone AR, Sue-Ling H, et al. Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability in patients with gastric carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1997;33:2342-2346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00343-2
  20. Nakashima H, Inoue H, Honda M, Shibuta K, Arinaga S, Mori M, et al. Th e heterogeneity of microsatellite instability in multiple gastric cancers. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:653-656.
  21. Oliveira C, Seruca R, Seixas M, Sobrinho-Simoes M. The clinicopathological features of gastric carcinomas with microsatellite instability may be mediated by mutations of diff erent "target genes": a study of the TGFbeta RII, IGFII R, and BAX genes. Am J Pathol 1998;153:1211-1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65665-9
  22. Miyoshi E, Haruma K, Hiyama T, Tanaka S, Yoshihara M, Shimamoto F, et al. Microsatellite instability is a genetic marker for the development of multiple gastric cancers. Int J Cancer 2001;95:350-353. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0215(20011120)95:6<350::AID-IJC1061>3.0.CO;2-A
  23. Kodera Y, Yamamura Y, Torii A, Uesaka K, Hirai T, Yasui K, et al. Incidence, diagnosis and signifi cance of multiple gastric cancer. Br J Surg 1995;82:1540-1543. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800821127
  24. Kim HC, Roh SA, Yook JH, Oh ST, Kim BS, Yu CS, et al. Microsatellite instability and promoter methylation of hMLH1 in sporadic gastric carcinoma. J Korean Gastric Cancer Assoc 2003;3:50-55. https://doi.org/10.5230/jkgca.2003.3.1.50

Cited by

  1. BAT-25 polymorphism in Chinese from Jiangsu province and its implication for locus microsatellite instability screening vol.27, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5301/jbm.2012.9311
  2. Characteristics of Metachronous Gastric Tumors after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Intraepithelial Neoplasms vol.2014, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/863595
  3. Prognostic value of telomere function in gastric cancers with and without microsatellite instability vol.27, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/meg.0000000000000250
  4. ARID1A expression in gastric adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathological significance and correlation with DNA mismatch repair status vol.21, pp.7, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2159
  5. Usefulness of Immunohistochemistry for Microsatellite Instability Screening in Gastric Cancer vol.9, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl15133
  6. Microsatellite Instability of Gastric and Colorectal Cancers as a Predictor of Synchronous Gastric or Colorectal Neoplasms vol.10, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl14310
  7. Diagnostic, Predictive, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Molecular Biomarkers in Third Millennium: A Breakthrough in Gastric Cancer vol.2017, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7869802
  8. Association between Mismatch-repair Genetic variation and the Risk of Multiple Primary Cancers: A Meta-Analysis vol.8, pp.16, 2010, https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.19810
  9. Predictive biomarkers along gastric cancer pathogenetic pathways vol.17, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2017.1301207
  10. Microsatellite instability in gastric cancer: molecular bases, clinical perspectives, and new treatment approaches vol.75, pp.22, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2906-9
  11. The Clinical Impact of the Genomic Landscape of Mismatch Repair–Deficient Cancers vol.8, pp.12, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0150
  12. Microsatellite Status Affects Tumor Response and Survival in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Clinical Stage III Gastric Cancer vol.10, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.614785
  13. Microsatellite Instability Analysis in Gastric Carcinomas of Moroccan Patients vol.25, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2020.0146