Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

Clinical Comparative Study for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral and Mineralized Allograft

탈단백우골과 비탈회 동종골을 사용한 상악동 거상술의 임상적 연구

  • Jo, Ji-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Moon, Seong-Yong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Oh, Ji-Su (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 조지호 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김수관 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 문성용 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 오지수 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.07.16
  • Accepted : 2010.09.03
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of popular bone graft materials mineralized allograft and deproteinized bovine bone mineral. Materials and Methods: One hundred seven implants of 78 patients, accompanied by sinus lift using the lateral window technique and simultaneous implantation, were sampled. In addition, some patients with severe systemic conditions were excluded. The initial bone heights of all patients ranged from 3-6 mm. All of the sample cases were treated at our hospital from January 2005 to January 2008. Techniques other than the lateral window technique were excluded, and only one graft material ($Tutoplast^{(R)}$ or Bio-$Oss^{(R)}$) was accepted for inclusion. $Tutoplast^{(R)}$ was used in 63 implants of 41 patients, whereas Bio-$Oss^{(R)}$) was chosen for the remaining 44 implants of 37 patients. The diameters of the particles used ranged from 0.25-1.0 mm, and the volume was 0.5-2 cc (mean, 1.5 cc). Results: The survival rate of the implant fixtures was 99.07% when the lateral window technique was used. Among all of the cases, cases in which $Tutoplast^{(R)}$ was used demonstrated a survival rate of 98.4%, whereas Bio-$Oss^{(R)}$) resulted in 100% survival. With respect to the alveolar bone height, no significant differences were detected between the two graft materials that failed. Conclusion: According to the result reported above, the two common materials for sinus augmentation do not have clinically significant difference. Rather, host factors, such as the height of residual bone, which could be disclosed during questioning patients' systemic conditions, might have greater effects on the prognosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Wallace SS, Froum SJ : Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systemic review. Ann Periodontol 8 : 328, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328
  2. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L et al : Systemic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 24 : 565, 2004.
  3. Gamradt SC, Lieberman JR : Bone graft for revision hip arthroplasty : biology and future applications. Chin Orthop 417 : 183, 2003.
  4. Sailer H, Weber F : Bone substitutes. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 4 : 384, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00014562
  5. Zimmermann R, Jakubietz R, Jakubietz M et al : Different preparation methods to obtain platelet components as a source of growth factors for local application. Transfusion 41 : 1217, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41101217.x
  6. Moore WR, Graves SE, Bain GI : Synthetic bone graft substitutes. ANZ J Surg 71 : 354, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02128.x
  7. Nkenke E, Schultze-Mosgau S, Radespiel-Troger M et al : Morbidity of harvesting of chin grafts: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 12 : 495, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120510.x
  8. Nkenke E, Radespiel-Troger M, Wiltfang J et al : Morbidity of harvesting of retromolar bone grafts : a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 : 514, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130511.x
  9. Loforte A, Delmo Walter EM, Stiller B et al : Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for intraoperative cardiac support in children with congenital heart disease. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 10 : 753, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2009.220475
  10. Jones JM, Lovell D, Cran GW et al : Impact of coronary artery bypass grafting on survival after aortic valve replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 5 : 327, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2005.118349
  11. Hoexter D : Bone regeneration graft materials. J Oral Impalntol. 26 : 290, 2002.
  12. Valentini P, Abensur D : Maxillary sinus floor elevation for implant placement with demineralized freeze-dried bone and bovine bone (Bio-Oss) : A clinical study of 20 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 17 : 232, 1997.
  13. Valentini P, Abensur D, Wenz B et al : Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral (Bio-Oss) for implant placement: A 5-year study on 15 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2 : 245, 2000.
  14. Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S et al : Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic material (Bio-Oss) in combination with veinous blood : A histologic and histomorphometric study in humans. Clin Oral Impalnts Res 11 : 217, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003217.x
  15. Hising P, Bolin A, Branting C : Reconstruction of a severely resorbed alveolar ridge crest with dental implants using bovine bone mineral for augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16 : 90, 2001.
  16. Klinge B, Alberius P, Isaksson S et al : Osseous response to implantated natural bone mineral and synthetic hydroxylapatite ceramics in the repair of experimental skull bone defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50 : 241, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90320-Y
  17. Valentini P, Abensur D, Densari D et al : Histological evaluation and implantation procedure. A human case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 9 : 59, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090108.x
  18. Hurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Kirsch A et al : Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part I. Evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived bone matrix. Clin Oral Implants Res 8 : 476, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080606.x
  19. Storgard-Jensen S, Aaboe M, Pinholt ES et al : Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11 : 55, 1996.
  20. Hammerle CHF, Chiantella GC, Karring T et al : The effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 9 : 151, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090302.x
  21. Schopf C, Diaber W, Tadiz D : Tutoplast processed allografts and xenografts. In: Jacotti M, Antonelli P (eds). 3D Block Technique from Image Diagnostics to Block Graft Bone Regeneration. Milano, Italy: RC Libri SRL, 53, 2005.
  22. Rogers KD, Daniels P : An x-ray diffraction study of the effects of heat treatment on bone mineral microstructure. Biomaterials 23 : 2577, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00395-7
  23. Committee on Research, Science and Therapy of the American Academy of Periodontology : Tissue banking of bone allografts used in periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 72 : 834, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.6.834
  24. Stuart JF, Stephen SW, Nicolas Elian et al : Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation : histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 26 : 543, 2006.
  25. Van den bergh JPA, Ten bruggencate CM, Groeneveld EHJ et al : Combinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 in maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery in 3 patients compared to autogenous bone grafts. A clinical pilot study. J Clin Periodont 27 : 627, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027009627.x
  26. Groeneveld EHJ, Van den bergh JPA, Holzmann P et al : Histomorphometrical analysis of bone formed in human maxillary sinus floor elevations grafted with OP-1 device, demineralized bone matrix or autogenous bone. Clin Oral Impl Res 10 : 499, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100608.x