DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Analysis of the Multiple Test Methods for the Detection of Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 2009 Virus

  • Choi, Young-Jin (Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Nam, Hae-Seon (Department of Clinical Parasitology and Allergy, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Park, Joon-Soo (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Hwi-Jun (Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Park, Kyung-Bae (Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Jeon, Min-Hyok (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Jin (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • HwangBo, Young (Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Park, Kwi-Sung (Chungcheongnam-Do Health and Environment Research Institute) ;
  • Baek, Kyoung-Ah (Chungcheongnam-Do Health and Environment Research Institute)
  • Received : 2010.04.27
  • Accepted : 2010.07.15
  • Published : 2010.10.28

Abstract

Accurate and rapid diagnosis of Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 2009 virus (H1N1 2009) infection is important for the prevention and control of influenza epidemics and the timely initiation of antiviral treatment. This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of several diagnostic tools for the detection of H1N1 2009. Flocked nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 254 outpatients of suspected H1N1 2009 during October 2009. This study analyzed the performances of the RealTime Ready Inf A/H1N1 Detection Set (Roche), Influenza A (H1N1) Real-Time Detection Kit (Bionote), Seeplex Influenza A/B OneStep Typing Set [Seeplex Reverse Transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR)], BinaxNow Influenza A & B Test Kit [Binax Rapid Antigen Test (RAT)], and SD BIOLINE Influenza Ag kit (SD RAT). Roche and Bionote real-time RT-PCR showed identical results for the H1N1 2009 hemagglutinin gene. Compared with real-time RT-PCR, the sensitivities and specificities were 83.7% and 100% for Seeplex RT-PCR, 64.5% and 94.7% for Binax RAT, and 69.5% and 100% for SD RAT. The sensitivities of Seeplex RT-PCR, Binax RAT, and SD RAT in patients aged over 21 years were 73.7%, 47.4%, and 57.9%, respectively. The sensitivities of Seeplex RT-PCR, Binax RAT, and SD RAT on the day of initial symptoms were mostly lower (68.8%, 56.3%, and 31.3%, respectively). In conclusion, multiplex RT-PCR and RAT for the detection of H1N1 2009 were significantly less sensitive than real-time RT-PCR. Moreover, a negative RAT may require more sensitive confirmatory assays, because it cannot be ruled out from influenza infection.

Keywords

References

  1. Boivin, G., I. Hardy, G. Tellier, and J. Maziade. 2000. Predicting influenza infections during epidemics with use of a clinical case definition. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31: 1166-1169. https://doi.org/10.1086/317425
  2. Booth, S., C. Baleriola, and W. D. Rawlinson. 2006. Comparison of two rapid influenza A/B test kits with reference methods showing high specificity and sensitivity for influenza A infection. J. Med. Virol. 78: 619-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20584
  3. Carrat, F., A. Tachet, C. Rouzioux, B. Housset, and A. J. Valleron. 1999. Evaluation of clinical case definitions of influenza: Detailed investigation of patients during the 1995-1996 epidemic in France. Clin. Infect. Dis. 28: 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1086/515117
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2009. Evaluation of rapid influenza diagnostic tests for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) virus - United States, 2009. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 58: 826-829.
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2009. Swine influenza A (H1N1) infection in two children - Southern California, March-April 2009. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 58: 400-402.
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC protocol of real time RT-PCR for influenza A (H1N1). Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/ realtimeptpcr/en/index.html (Accessed 16 April 2010).
  7. Choi, Y. J., H. J. Kim, J. S. Park, M. H Oh, H. S. Nam, Y. B. Kim, B. K. Cho, M. J. Ji, and J. S. Oh. 2010. Evaluation of new rapid antigen test for the detection of pandemic influenza A/ H1N1 2009 virus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48: 2260-2262.
  8. Drexler, J. F., A. Helmer, H. Kirberg, U. Reber, M. Panning, M. Muller, et al. 2009. Poor clinical sensitivity of rapid antigen test for influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15: 1662-1664. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1510.091186
  9. Druce, J., T. Tran, H. Kelly, M. Kaye, D. Chibo, R. Kostecki, A. Amiri, M. Catton, and C. Birch. 2005. Laboratory diagnosis and surveillance of human respiratory viruses by PCR in Victoria, Australia, 2002-2003. J. Med. Virol. 75: 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20246
  10. Fiore, A. E., D. K. Shay, K. Broder, J. K. Iskander, T. M. Uyeki, G. Mootrey, J. S. Bresee, and N. S. Cox. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). 2008. Prevention and control of influenza: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2008. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 57(RR-7): 1-60.
  11. Fuenzalida, L., S. Blanco, C. Prat, M. Vivancos, M. J. Dominguez, J. M. Modol, C. Rodrigo, and V. Ausina. 2009. Utility of the rapid antigen detection BinaxNOW A&B test for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) virus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. [In press.]
  12. Ginocchio, C. C., F. Zhang, R. Manji, S. Arora, M. Bornfreund, L. Falk, et al. 2009. Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak. J. Clin. Virol. 45: 191-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2009.06.005
  13. Harper, S. A., J. S. Bradley, J. A. Englund, T. M. File, S. Gravenstein, F. G. Hayden, et al. Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2009. Seasonal influenza in adults and children - diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and institutional outbreak management: Clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 48: 1003-1032. https://doi.org/10.1086/598513
  14. Hurt, A. C., R. Alexander, J. Hibbert, N. Deed, and I. G. Barr. 2007. Performance of six influenza rapid tests in detecting human influenza in clinical specimens. J. Clin. Virol. 39: 132-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2007.03.002
  15. Kok, J., C. C. Blyth, H. Foo, J. Patterson, J. Taylor, K. McPhie, V. M. Ratnamohan, J. R. Iredell, and D. E. Dwyer. 2010. Comparison of a rapid antigen test with nucleic acid testing during cocirculation of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 and seasonal influenza A/H3N2. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48: 290-291. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01465-09
  16. Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza Weekly Report. Available at: http://flu.cdc.go.kr. (Accessed 7 April 2010.).
  17. Monto, A. S., S. Gravenstein, M. Elliott, M. Colopy, and J. Schweinle. 2000. Clinical signs and symptoms predicting influenza infection. Arch. Intern. Med. 160: 3243-3247. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.21.3243
  18. Nicholson, K. G., J. Kent, V. Hammersley, and E. Cancio. 1997. Acute viral infections of upper respiratory tract in elderly people living in the community: Comparative, prospective, population based study of disease burden. Br. Med. J. 315: 1060-1064. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7115.1060
  19. Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team, F. S. Dawood, S. Jain, L. Finelli, M. W. Shaw, S. Lindstrom, R. J. Garten, et al. 2009. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N. Engl. J. Med. 360: 2605-2615. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0903810
  20. Rahman, M., M. F. Vandermause, B. A. Kieke, and E. A. Belongia. 2008. Performance of Binax NOW Flu A and B and direct fluorescent assay in comparison with a composite of viral culture or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for detection of influenza infection during the 2006 to 2007 season. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 62: 162-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.10.012
  21. Rodriguez, W. J., R. H. Schwartz, and M. M. Thorne. 2002. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for influenza in a pediatric practice. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 21: 193-196. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006454-200203000-00006
  22. Song, J. H., J. S. Park, Y. J. Choi, H. J. Kim, H. S. Nam, and Y. B. Kim. 2009. Clinical utility of rapid influenza antigen test. J. Soonchunhyang Med. Sci. 15: 125-131.
  23. Treanor, J. J. 2010. Influeza viruses, including avian influenza and swine influenza, pp. 2265-2288. In G. L. Mandell and J. E. Bennett (eds.). Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 7th Ed. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia.
  24. van Elden, L. J., G. A. van Essen, C. A. Boucher, A. M. van Loon, M. Nijhuis, P. Schipper, T. J. Verheij, and I. M. Hoepelman. 2001. Clinical diagnosis of influenza virus infection: Evaluation of diagnostic tools in general practice. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 51: 630-634.
  25. Watcharananan, S., S. Kiertiburanakul, and W. Chantratita. 2010. Rapid influenza diagnostic test during the outbreak of the novel influenza A/H1N1 2009 in Thailand: An experience with better test performance in resource limited setting. J. Infect. 60: 86-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2009.10.049
  26. Welch, D. F. and C. C. Ginocchio. 2010. Role of rapid immunochromatographic antigen testing in diagnosis of influenza A virus 2009 H1N1 infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48: 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02268-09
  27. World Health Organisation. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 - update 94. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/don/2010_04_01/en/ index.html. (Accessed 7 April 2010.).
  28. Wright, P. F. and G. Neumann. 2007. Orthomyxoviruses, pp. 1691-1740. In D. M. Knipe and P. M. Howley (eds.). Field, Virology, 5th Ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, a Wolter Kluwer Business, Philadelphia, PA.
  29. Yoo, Y., J. W. Sohn, D. W. Park, J. Y. Kim, H. K. Shin, Y. Lee, J. T. Choung, C. K. Lee, and M. J. Kim. 2007. Clinical evaluation of the SD Bioline influenza virus antigen test for rapid detection of influenza viruses A and B in children and adults during the influenza season. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 14: 1050-1052. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00465-06
  30. Zambon, M., J. Hays, A. Webster, R. Newman, and O. Keene. 2001. Diagnosis of influenza in the community: Relationship of clinical diagnosis to confirmed virological, serologic, or molecular detection of influenza. Arch. Intern. Med. 161: 2116-2122. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.161.17.2116

Cited by

  1. Genetic Diversity of Echovirus 6 Strains Circulating in Korea vol.40, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4167/jbv.2010.40.4.191
  2. Evaluation of a new rapid test for the detection of influenza A and B viruses and pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus subtyping in respiratory samples vol.60, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.030585-0
  3. Rash, an uncommon but existing feature of H1N1 influenza among children vol.5, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00197.x
  4. Clinical characteristics of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection in children and the performance of rapid antigen test vol.54, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2011.54.10.405
  5. Performance of a rapid molecular multiplex assay for the detection of influenza and picornaviruses vol.44, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2012.704150
  6. Comparison of Molecular Assays for the Rapid Detection and Simultaneous Subtype Differentiation of the Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Virus vol.22, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1107.07061
  7. An Interferometric Reflectance Imaging Sensor for Point of Care Viral Diagnostics vol.60, pp.12, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2013.2272666
  8. Development of a multiplex one step RT-PCR that detects eighteen respiratory viruses in clinical specimens and comparison with real time RT-PCR vol.189, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.12.017
  9. Display of active beta-glucosidase on the surface of Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells using novel anchor proteins vol.97, pp.10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4733-0
  10. Epidemiology and Clinical Characteristics of Enterovirus Infections in Children: A Single Center Analysis from 2006 to 2010 vol.20, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14776/kjpid.2013.20.2.81