DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

LMO 격리 포장에서 유전자비변형 모본 고추(P915)와 유전자 변형 고추(CMVP0-CP)에 서식하는 절지동물 군집 비교연구

The Comparative Study of Arthropods Community on Non-transgenic Mother Chili Pepper (P915) and Transgenic Chili Pepper (CMVP0-CP) in the Isolated Quarantine LMO Fields

  • Yi, Hoon-Bok (Division of Environmental and Life Science, Seoul Women's University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Jung (Division of Environmental and Life Science, Seoul Women's University)
  • 투고 : 2010.03.11
  • 심사 : 2010.03.25
  • 발행 : 2010.03.30

초록

토마토나 고추 등의 유용작물에 자주 발생하여 생산량을 저하시키는 오이모자이크병에 대한 저항성을 높여 생산량을 증대시키기 위하여 개발된 CMVP0-CP (Cucumber mosaic virus-coat protein) gene이 삽입된 유전자 변형 CMVP0-CP 고추 (line 7)에 대한 환경위해성을 평가하였다. 2007년 고추의 생육기간 동안 절지동물의 군집구조를 3회(6월 19일, 7월30일, 8월 31일)에 걸쳐 조사를 하였다. 두 가시의 고추, 즉 모본(P915, nTR)고추와 유전자변형 고추(CMVP0-CP (line 7), TR)의 꽃과 잎에 서식하는 곤충을 포함한 절지동물의 군집구조를 파악하기 위하여 곤충을 포획할 수 있는 곤충진공포획기를 사용하여 절지동물을 정량적으로 채집하였다. 절지동물의 군집은 채집 시기별로 출현 종과 빈도수에 차이는 있었지만 두 작물간의 군집 구조는 통계학적으로 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 지금까지 수행된 본 연구결과를 근거로 판단하여 볼 때, 유전자 변형 고추로 인한 비표적 생물체의 군집구조가 모본 고추의 군집구조와 차이가 나타나지 않아 환경 위해서도 없는 것으로 볼 수 있지만, 좀더 확실한 유전자변형생물체인 고추의 환경위해성이 없다는 결론을 얻기 위해서는 추가적인 연구가 수행되어져야 할 것이다.

The environmental risks of cucumber mosaic virus resistant transgenic chili peppers with the CMVP0-CP gene on non-target organisms in the agroecosystem environments was evaluated during the periods of the chili pepper growing season (June 19, July 30, August 31) in 2007. Arthropods assemblages leaves and flowers of chili peppers were quantitatively collected by using an insect vacuum collector to compare the arthropod community structures between non-transgenic chili peppers (nTR, P 915) and mosaic virus resistant transgenic chili peppers (TR, CMV-cp, line 7). There was no statistical difference in the arthropod community structure between the two types of crops, nTR and TR, at the same season, although the species richness and Shannon's index were somewhat different among seasons; indicating no effects of genetically modified peppers on the arthropod community. However, further studies were required to conclude more concretely for the potential environmental risk of the transgenic chili pepper of CMV-cp.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Clarke, K.R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18: 117-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x
  2. Cody, M.L. 1986. Diversity, rarity and conservation in Mediterranean-climate regions, pp. 122-152. In M.E. Soule(ed.), Conservation biology, the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, USA.
  3. Conner, A.J., T.R. Glare and J.P. Nap. 2003. The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. Plant J. 33: 19-46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7412.2002.001607.x
  4. Dale, P. 2002. The environmental impact of genetically modified (GM) crops-A review. J. Agri. Sci. 138: 245-248.
  5. Fraley, R. 1992. Sustaining the supply. Bio. Technology 10: 40-43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0192-40
  6. Hilbeck, A. and D.A. Andow. 2004. Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Organisms: V. l. A Case Study of Bt Maize in Kenya. CABI, Wallingford, UK.
  7. Hilbeck, A, D.A. Andow and E.M.G. Fontes. 2006. Environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms: V.2 Methodologies for assessing Bt cotton in Brazil. CABI, London, UK.
  8. James, C. 2005. Executive summary of global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: ISAAA Briefs No. 34. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
  9. Jung, Y.H. 2000. Diagnosis and control of insect pests and vegetables diseases Rural Development Administration National Academy of Agricultural Science. Academy book.
  10. KRlBB [Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Bioteclmology]. 2005. Biosafety White Paper. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
  11. Kruskal, J.B. 1964. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika. 29: 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289694
  12. Lee, B.K., C.G. Kim, J.Y. Park, K.W. Park, H.B. Yi, C.H. Harn and H.M. Kim. 2007. Assessment of the Persistence of DNA in Decomposing Leaves of CMVP0-CP Transgenic red Pepper in the Field Conditions. Kor. J. Environ. Agr. 26: 319-324. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2007.26.4.319
  13. Mather, P.M. 1976. Computational methods of multivariate analysis in physical geography. Wiley, London, UK.
  14. McCune, B. and J.B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design. Gleneden Beach, USA.
  15. MOE [Ministry of Environment]. 2010. The report for the items development for the envrionmental risk assesement. Report of Ministry of Environment. Korea.
  16. Moon, H.C., C.I. Kwon, I.J. Rock, G.B. Rae, D.H. Kim and C.Y. Hwang. 2006. Seasonal occurrence and damage by thrips on open and red pepper in Jeonbuk: Province. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 45: 9-13.
  17. Park, J.E., H.B. Yi, C.G. Kim, S.C. Jeong, W.K. Yoon, K.W. Park, B.K. Lee and H.M. Kim. 2007. The Effect of the Anthracmose Resistant red Pepper (PepEST gene) on the Non-target Insects, Green Peach Aphids (Myzus persicae Sulzer, Homoptera). Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 46: 343-348. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2007.46.3.343
  18. SAS, Institute. 2001. PROC user's manual, version 6th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
  19. Simmonds, N.W., J. Smartt, S. Millam, and W. Spoor. 1999. Principles of Crop Improvement, 2nd ed. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
  20. Woo, H.J., S.H. Lim, K.J. Lee, S.Y. Won, T.S. Kim, H.S. Cho and Y.M. Jin. 2006. Current Development Status on the Genetically Modified Crops in Korea. J. Intl, Agri. 18: 221-229.
  21. Yi, H.B., J.E. Park, M.C. Kwon, S.K. Park, C.G. Kim, S.C. Jeong, W.K. Yoon, S.M. Park, S.L. Han, C.H. Harn and H.M. Kim, 2006. Environmental risk assessment of watermelon grafted onto transgenic rootstock: resistant to Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMY) on non-target inects in conventional agro-ecosystem. J. Ecol. Field Biol. 29: 323-330. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2006.29.4.323
  22. Yi, H.B., M.C. Kwon, J.E. Park, C.G. Kim, K.W. Park, B.K. Lee and H.M. Kim. 2007. Effect of the Anthracnose Resistant Transgenic red Pepper on the Arthropod communities in a Confined Field. Kor. J. Environ. Biol. 25: 326-335.