DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation Plant Species Diversity and Physiographical Factors in Mountain Forest in North of Iran

  • Hashemi, Seyed Armin (Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University)
  • Received : 2009.10.13
  • Accepted : 2010.04.20
  • Published : 2010.04.30

Abstract

Species diversity is one of the most important specifications of biological societies. Diversity of organisms, measurement of variety and examination of those hypotheses that are about reasons of diversity are such as affairs that have been desired by the ecologists for a long time. In this research, diversity of plant species in forest region, numbers of 60 sample plots in 256.00 square meters have been considered in random - systematic inventory was considered. In each sample plot, four micro-plots in 2.25 square meters in order to study on herbal cover, were executed that totally 240 micro-plots were considered. At each plot six diversity indices in relation to physiographic factors (slope, geographical aspect and altitude from the sea level) were studied. The results indicate that species diversity is more in the northern direction and also species diversity in slops less than 30% has the most amounts. Factor of altitude from the sea level did not have meaningful relation with species diversity. Through study on correlation of the numbers of species in sample plots with indices and also process and role of indices in different processors of analysis, Simpson's reciprocal index was suggested as suitable index in this type of studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Alatalo, R.V. 1981. Problems in the measurement of evenness in ecology. Oikos 37: 199-204. https://doi.org/10.2307/3544465
  2. Baev, P.V., and Penev, L.D. 1995. BIODIV. Program for calculating biological diversity parameters, similarity, niche overlap, and cluster analysis. Version 5.1. Pensoft, 57 p
  3. Baker, M.E., Barnes, B.V. 1998. Landscape ecosystem diversity of river floodlains in northwestern Lower Michigan, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest 28: 1405-1418. https://doi.org/10.1139/x98-107
  4. Barbour, M.G., Burk, J.H., Pitts, W.D., Gilliam, F.S., Schwartz, M.W. 1999. Terrestrial Plant Ecology (3rd edition), An important of Addison Wesley Longman Incorporation, 649 p.
  5. Barnes, B.V., Zak, D.R., Denton, S.R. and Spurr, S.H. 1998. Forest ecology, (4th ed.), John Wileyand Sons, Inc., 773 p.
  6. Beers, T.W., Dress, P.E. and Wensel, L.C. 1966. Aspect transformation in site productivity research. Journal of Forestry 80: 493-498.
  7. Cain S.A. 1938. The species - area curve. American Midland Naturalist 19: 573-581. https://doi.org/10.2307/2420468
  8. Cannon, H.C., Peart, R.P. and Lighton, L. 1998. Tree species diversity in commercially logged Bornean Rainforest. Science 281: 1366-1368. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5381.1366
  9. Ehrlich P.R., Wilson, E.O. 1991. Biodiversity studies: Science and policy. Science 253: 758-762. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.253.5021.758
  10. Grabherr, G., Gottfried, M., Gruber, A. and Pauli, H. 1995. Patterns and current changes in alpine plant diversity, 167-181. In : Chapin A, Korner C (eds.) Arctic and alpine biodiversity: patterns, causes and ecosystem consequences. Ecological Studies. Heidelberg.
  11. IIill, M.O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54(2): 427-432. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934352
  12. Krebs, J.C. 1998. Ecological methodology. Addison Wesley Longman Inc., 620 p.
  13. Korner, C. 2000. Why are there global gradients in species richness? Mountains might hold the answer. TREE 15: 513.
  14. Molinari, J. 1989. A calibrated index for the measurement of evenness. Oikos 56: 319-326. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565616
  15. Neufeldt V. and Guralink,D.B. 1988. Websters New World dictionary, Third College Edition, Simon and Schuster. New York, in: Barnes, B.V., Zak, D.R., Denton, S.R. and Spurr, S.H., (eds.). Forest Ecology (4th edition). John Wiley and Sons Inc., 774 pp.
  16. Peet, R.K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systematics 5, 285-307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001441
  17. Pitkanen, S. 1998. The use of diversity indices to assess the diversity of vegetation in managed Boreal Forests. Forest Ecology and Management 112: 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00319-3
  18. Sagar, R., Raghubanshi, A.S. and Singh, J.S. 2003. Tree species composition, dispersion and diversity along a disturbance gradient in dry tropical forest region of India. Forest Ecology and management 186: 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00235-4
  19. Sternberg, M. and Shoshany, M. 2001. Influence of slope aspect on Mediterranean woody formation: comparison of semiarid and an arid site in Israel. Ecological Research 16: 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00393.x
  20. Theurillat, J.P., Schlusse, A., Wigct, L. and Guisan, A. 1999. Elevational floristic gradient of vascular plants at the subalpine - alpine ecocline in the Valais (Switzerland). ESF Alpnet News 1: 19-20.
  21. Vujnovic, K., Wein, R.W. and Dale. M.R.T. 2002. Predicting plant species diversity in response to disturbance magnitude in grassland remnants of central Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 80: 504-511. https://doi.org/10.1139/b02-032
  22. Whittaker. R.H., 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21 (2/3): 213-251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1218190
  23. Wilson. M.V. and Shmida, A. 1984. Measuring beta diversity with presence- absence data. Journal of Ecology 72: 1055-1064. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259551