A study on job preference type, academic ability and academic performance of dental hygiene department student

일부 치위생과 학생의 직업선호도 유형 및 학업능력과 학업성취도에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2009.10.27
  • Accepted : 2010.01.15
  • Published : 2010.02.28

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this study was to provide basic materials for defining educational direction of dental hygiene department and establishing the instruction to improve direction consulting and academic effect of dental hygiene department student. Methods : The researcher surveyed the relation among job aptitude, academic ability and academic performance by selecting 131 dental hygiene department students of P university as study targets. Results : For high school classifications, direction searches and academic abilities of dental hygiene department students of P university, it was found that classical high school was 68.7% and vocational high school was 31.3%. For job aptitude, social type was 58.0% and artistic type was 26.0% so they were usual. For academic ability, interpersonal relation($12.78{\pm}1.34$), music/rhythm was($12.32{\pm}1.09$) and natural($12.32{\pm}1.00$) showed high scores in order over the first, the second and the third field and language/vocabulary(22.6%) and music/rhythm(21.6%) was the next. For academic performance depending on high school classification, job aptitude and academic ability, there was a significant difference in high school classification by classical high school($86.55{\pm}8.21$) and vocational high school($85.34{\pm}11.31$)(p<0.05) and there was also a significant difference in job aptitude by social type($85.45{\pm}9.42$) and artistic type($88.41{\pm}6.93$)(p<0.05). In the mutual relation between academic ability and academic performance, the high academic ability score in the first field was led to the high score in the second and the third field, showing significant mutual relation(p<0.00). Conclusions : This research has been accomplished by college students of dental hygeine department, so you have to consider before generalizing these results. Therefore it is required to research more, likewise using a comparison with other students or it should be conducted by general people.

Keywords

References

  1. 박현애, 최정수, 류시원. 장.단기 보건의료 인력 수급에 관한 연구. 한국보건사회연구원 1990.
  2. 이은주. 개념도를 활용한 교수-학습 활동이 수학적 개념 형성과 학습 성향에 미치는 영향. 대구교대 교육대학원 석사학위논문 2004.
  3. 고복자. 장독립적-장의존적 인지양식과 학업성취도의 관계. 국민대학교 대학원 석사 학위논문 1999.
  4. Witkin H. A. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Res 1977;17:1-64.
  5. 안창규. 진로탐색 상담전문가 교육자료. 서울:한국가이던스사;2003.
  6. 김미경. 중학생에 있어서 Holland의 진로유형 성격과 적성과의 관계. 건국대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 2000.
  7. 최동선. 고등학생의 직업적 성격과 학업성취도, 학교에의 적응, 직업가치관의 관계 분석. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 1997.
  8. 김연숙. 일 간호전문대학 간호과 학생들의 간호교육에 대한 태도 조사연구. 동남보건전문대학 논문집 1995;12(1):471-484.
  9. 이병임, 정순례. 전문대 여학생의 MBTI 성격 유형 및 Holland 직업선호도 유형과 학업 성취도의 관계. 교육심리연구 2003;17(2): 127-145.
  10. 강현랑. 진로지도를 위한 적성, 흥미, 교과 성적의 관계. 부산대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문 2000.
  11. Holland J. L.. Making vocational choices. A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.) Odessa. FL : Psychological Assessment Resources. 1985.
  12. 김봉환, 김병석, 정철영. 학교진로상담. 서울:학지사;2000.
  13. 박노윤. 학습 성향의 변화와 영향요인. 한국 인사. 조직연구 2004;12(2):35-75.
  14. 최계훈, 소명숙. 보건계열 중 간호과와 안경광학과 학생들의 학습 성향 분석. 대구보건대학 논문집 2006;26:163-174.
  15. 경일대학교 교수학습지원센터. 학습자 특성 파악하기. 2005.