Layout Principles of Renaissance Classicism Architectural Style and Its Application on Modern Fashion Design - Focused on Classic Style Fashion after the Year 1999 -

르네상스 고전주의 건축양식의 조형원리와 현대패션디자인에의 적용 - 1999년 이후 클래식 스타일 패션을 중심으로 -

  • 이신영 (동양대학교 패션스타일리스트학과)
  • Received : 2009.12.02
  • Accepted : 2010.04.10
  • Published : 2010.04.30

Abstract

The analysis of an art trend in the principle dimension starts by observing the object of work in the perspective of formative composition and recognizing it as a universal system. It can be said that it is consistent with an interpretation method for a form theory of formal history by Heinrich W$\ddot{o}$lfflin, a leading form critic in art criticism. Hence, the purpose of this study was to find out what are the formative principles in Renaissance Classicism as a design principle to be applicable to modern fashion by reviewing the formative characteristics of Renaissance Classicism Architecture with which W$\ddot{o}$lfflin directly dealt. As for the theoretical literature review, I used W$\ddot{o}$lfflin's theoretical framework and looked at the Renaissance Classicism Architecture that he studied and examined the possibility of utilizing his theory as a layout principle and the characteristics. As for analysis of design cases, I applied the aforementioned architecture layout principle to modern fashion and conducted case study analysis to delve into distinctive layout principles found in fashion. The study showed that the Renaissance Classicism Architectural Style is marked by linearity, planarity, closing and multiple unity: linearity was expressed in the observation form in fixed frontal view and an emphasis on a tangible silhouette homeogenous and definite line structures; planarity was achieved in the form of paralleled layers of frontal view element, planarity style, and identical and proportional repetition of various sizes.; closing signified the pursuit of complete and clear regularity, and architecture developed in a constructive phase through organizational inevitability and absolute invariability.; multiple unity was expressed in self-completedness and independent parallel of discrete forms and harmony of emphasized individual elements in a totality. Applying these layout characteristics of the Renaissance Classicism Architectural style and to see their individual expressive features, I found out that in adopting layout principles of the Renaissance Classicism Architecture to modern fashion, it turned out to be an emphasis of individual silhouettes, a flattened space, completed objects, organic harmony among independent parts: the emphasis of individual silhouettes was expressed in individual definitiveness of formative lines of clothes in accordance with body joints and an emphasis on formative lines of clothes; the flattened space was marked by single layer structure, planarity of elements of clothes, and listing arrangement by appropriate proportion.; the completedness of the objects was expressed by the stationary state where overall image is fixed, the construction of homogeneous and complete space, and absolute inevitability of internal layout in proportion; lastly, organic harmony of independent parts was stressed in independent completedness of each detail, and organic harmony of the whole. The expressive features would lead to a unique expression style of linear emphasis, proportion, constructive forms, and two-dimensional arrangement. The meaning of this study is follows: The characteristics of art school of thought are given shape by appling & analysing the architectural layout principles of historical art school of thought to modern fashion in the view point of formal construction dimension. The applied possibility of historical art school of thought as the source of inspiration about the fashion design is extended.

Keywords

References

  1. 겔런터, 마크 (2007). 보이는 건축 보이지 않는 생각: 건축 디자인이론의 비판적 역사. 최아사 역. 서울: 도서출판 한길사.
  2. 금선주 (1995). "하인리히 뵐플린의 '양식론' 고찰." 홍익대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  3. 김병기 (2005). "렘 쿨하스 건축의 개방성에 관한 연구." 한양대학교 산업경영대학원 석사학위논문.
  4. 김성곤, 김경희 (2003). 서양건축사. 서울: 기문당.
  5. 바워, 헤르만 (1998). 미술사학의 이해. 홍진경 역. 서울: 시공사.
  6. 뵐플린, 하인리히 (1995). 미술사의 기초개념(Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe). 박지형 역. 서울: 시공사.
  7. 스트릭랜드, 캐롤 (2003). 클릭, 서양건축사. 양상현, 서민영, 조난주, 김마리 역. 서울: 예경.
  8. 안경규 (1996). "르네상스 건축과 바로크 건축의 이원적 성향에 관한 연구." 청주대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  9. 유송옥 (1994). 복식의장학. 서울: 수학사.
  10. 정우영 (2004). "회화작품에 대한 양식사적 해석에 관한 연구." 대구가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  11. 조선영 (2002). "지역사회공동체(community)로서의 교회환경디자인 연구: 뵐플린의 미적 지각 이론과 프랙탈 기하학의 조형적 접근." 이화여자 대학교 디자인대학원 석사학위논문.
  12. 조영제, 권명광, 안상수, 이순종 기획 (2000). 디자인사전. 서울: 안그라픽스.
  13. 페브스너, 니콜라우스 (2000). 유럽 건축사 개관. 김복지 외 역. 서울: 태림문화사.