아동학회지 (Korean Journal of Child Studies)

  • 제31권4호
  • /
  • Pages.75-90
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1226-1688(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-408X(eISSN)
한국아동학회 (Korean Association of Child Studies)
권호 표지

유아들의 거친 신체 놀이 양상과 이에 영향을 주는 요인

An Investigation into the Aspects and Factors At Work in Children's Rough and Tumble Play

  • 고여훈 (이화여자대학교 일반대학원 유아교육과) ;
  • 엄정애 (이화여자대학교 유아교육과)
  • Koh, Yeo-Hun (Department of Early Childhood Education, Ewha Womans Univ.) ;
  • Ohm, Jung-Ae (Department of Early Childhood Education, Ewha Womans Univ.)
  • 투고 : 2010.04.29
  • 심사 : 2010.07.08
  • 발행 : 2010.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study sought to investigate the aspects and other factors at work in rough and tumble play by children, through a qualitative research approach. The participants consisted of 25 5-year-old children and their teachers at A kindergarten, located in Seoul. The results of the research are as follow：(1) there are various aspects in the initiation of, development of, as well as the way children's rough and tumble play ends. (2) The factors that trigger children's rough and tumble play include : limitation and creation of toys, teacher absence, particular times throughout the day, gender awareness, peer relationships, the reactions of teachers, and social and cultural factors at work in class.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김수영.김수임 .김현아 .정정희(2007). 놀이지도. 서울 : 양서원.
  2. 김영아(2007). 유아의 거친 신체 놀이와 사회적 능력 간의 관계. 연세대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 청구논문.
  3. 신은수 .김명순.신동주 . 이종희.최석란(2002). 놀이와 유아. 서울 : 이화여자대학교 출판부.
  4. 우진아(2003). 유아의 신체 놀이에 대한 교사의 인식 및 놀이 양상. 중앙대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 청구논문.
  5. 이숙재(1998). 어린이의 거친 신체 놀이와 사회적 능력 연구. 아동학회지, 19(1), 131-140.
  6. 이시자. 임명희(1998). Rough-and-Tumble 놀이에 관한 연구 : 6세 아동의 유치원 바깥놀이를 중심으로. 교육학연구, 36(3), 255-279.
  7. 이지영(2007). 남여 유아의 거친 신체 놀이와 또래 유능성과의 관계. 덕성여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 청구논문.
  8. 최형성.최석란(1999). 아동의 거친 몸싸움놀이 발생장소 및 거친 몸싸움놀이의 일반적인 싸움의 구분기준에 관한 연구. 한국영유아보육학회, 17, 311-330.
  9. Blurton-Jones, N. (1972). Categories of child-child interaction. In N. Blurton-Jones (Ed.), Ethological of child behaviour (pp. 97-127). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  10. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education : An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA : Pearson A & B.
  11. Carlsson-Paige, N., & Levin, D. (1987). The war play dilemma : Balancing the needs and values in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY : Teachers College Press.
  12. Cosrabile, A., Smith, P. K., Matheson, L., Aston, J., Hunter, T., & Boulton, M. (1991). Cross-national comparison of how children distinguish serious and playful fighting. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 881-887.
  13. DiPietro, J. A. (1981). Rough-and-tumble play : A function of gender. Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 50-58.
  14. Humphreys, A., & Smith, P. K. (1984). Rough-and-tumble in preschool and playground. In P. K. Smith (Ed.), Play in animals and humans (pp. 241-266). London: Basil Blackwell.
  15. Humphreys, A., & Smith, P. K. (1987). Rough-and-tumble play, friendship and dominance in school children : Evidence for continuity and change with age. Child Development, 58, 201-212. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130302
  16. Johnson, J. E., Christe, J. F., & Wardle, F. (2006). 놀이, 발달, 유아교육(이진희 외 공역). 서울 : 아카데미 프레스(원서 2005 출판).
  17. Ladd, G. (1983). Social networks of popular, average, and rejected children in school seuings. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 283-307.
  18. Neil, S. (1976). Aggressive and non-Aggressive fighting in twelve to thirteen year old pre-adolescent boys. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00394.x
  19. Pellegrini, A. D. (1987). Rough-and-tumble play : Developmental and educational significance. Educational Psychologist, 22, 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2201_2
  20. Pellegrini, A. D. (1989). Children's rough-and-tumble play : Issues in categorization and function. Educational Policy, 3(4), 389-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904889003004006
  21. Pellegrini, A. D. (1991). A longitudinal study of popular and rejected children's rough and tumble play. Early Education and Development, 2(3), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed0203_3
  22. Schafer, M., & Smith, P. K. (1996). Teachers' perception of play fighting and real fighting in primary school. Educational Research, . 38(2), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188960380205
  23. Smith, P. K. (1973). Temporal clusters and individual differences in the behavior of preschool children. In R. Michael & J. Crook (Eds.), Comparative ecology and behavior of primates (pp. 752-798). London : Academic Press.
  24. Smith, P. K., & Boulton, M. (1990). Rough-and-tumble play, aggression and dominance : Perception and behavior in children's encounters. Human Development, 33, 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276524
  25. Tannock, M. T. (2008). Rough and tumble play : An investigation of the perception of educators and young children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(4), 357-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0196-1
  26. Whiting, B. B., & Edwards, S. P. (1973). A crosscultural analysis of sex-differences in the behavior of children aged three through eleven. Journal of Social Psychology, 91, 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1973.9923040