DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pathogenic Groups Identified Among Isolates of Rhynchosporium secalis

  • Received : 2010.04.05
  • Accepted : 2010.05.31
  • Published : 2010.09.01

Abstract

Scald, caused by Rhynchosporium secalis has been the major yield-reducing factor for barley production during the last decade. In this study, pathogenic groups of R. secalis were identified to obtain a global picture of the assembly of isolates involved in Syrian populations which is essential for the development of scald-resistant barley cultivars. To identify a number of pathogenic groups, 49 isolates collected over ten years from major barley growing areas in Syria were evaluated on five differential barley genotypes. Genotypes presented a continuous range of response from highly susceptible to moderately resistant, but none were immune to the disease. A cluster analysis placed isolates in six distinct differential pathogenic groups. Mean disease rating of 39.24% was the separation point between avirulent and virulent reactions. Isolate Rs46 exhibited distinct differential virulence patterns associated with high frequency across all genotypes. Hence, the data presented here provides crucial information for future selection of isolates to develop durable barley scald resistance.

Keywords

References

  1. Anonymous, 1988. STAT-ITCF, Programme, MICROSTA, realized by ECOSOFT, 2nd Ver. Institut Technique des Cereals et des Fourrages Paris, France.
  2. Arabi, M. I. E., Jawhar M. and Al-Shehadah, E. 2008. Molecular and pathogenic variation identified among isolates of Rhynchosporium secalis from Syria. J. Plant Pathol. 90:179-184.
  3. Bouajila, A., Haouas, S., Fakhfakh, M., Rezgui, S. and Yahyaoui, A. 2006. Pathotypic diversity of Rhynchosporium secalis (oudum) in Tunisia. Afri. J. Biotechnol. 5:570-759.
  4. Brown, A. H. D., Garvin, D. F., Burdon, J. J., Abbott, D. C. and Read, B. J. 1996. The effect of combining scald resistance genes on disease levels, yield and quality traits in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:361-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223177
  5. Eyal, Z., Scharen, A. L., Huffman, M. D. and Prescott, J. M. 1985. Global insights into virulence frequencies of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Phytopathology 75:1456-1462. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-75-1456
  6. Forgan, A. H., Knogge, W. and Anderson, P. A. 2007. Asexual Genetic Exchange in the Barley Pathogen Rhynchosporium secalis. Phytopathology 97:650-654. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-97-5-0650
  7. Goodwin, S. B., Webster, R. K. and Allard, R. W. 1994. Evidence for mutation and migration as sources of genetic variation in populations of Rhynchosporium secalis. Phytopathology 84: 1047-1053. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-84-1047
  8. Jorgensen, H. J. L. and Smedegaard, P. V. 1995. Pathogenic variation of Rhynchosporium secalis in Denmark and sources of resistance in barley. J. Phytopathol. 79:297-301.
  9. Meles, K., Udupa, A., Abang, S. M. M., Abu-Blan, H., Baum, M., Ceccarelli, S. and Yahyaoui, A. H. 2005. Amplified fragment length polymorphism among Rhynchosporium secalis isolates collected from a single barley field in Syria. Ann. Appl. Biol. 146:389-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.040139.x
  10. Mert, Z. and Karakaya, A. 2003. Determination of the suitable inoculum concentration for Rhynchosporium secalis seedling assays. J. Phytopathol. 151:699-701. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0931-1785.2003.00770.x
  11. Salamati, S. and Tronsmo, M. 1997. Pathogenicity of Rhynchosporium secalis isolates from Norway on 30 cultivars of barley. Plant Pathol. 46:416-424. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.1997.d01-20.x
  12. Stedman, O. J. 1980. Observations on the production and dispersal of spores, and infection by Rbynchosporium secalis. Ann. Appl. Biol. 5:163-175.
  13. Xi, K., Xue, A., Burnett, P. A., Helm, J. H. and Turkington, T. K. 2000. Quantitative resistance of barley cultivars to Rhynchosporium secalis. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 22:217-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660009500466
  14. Xi, K., Turkington, T. K., Helm, J. H. and Bos, C. 2002. Pathogenic variation of Rhynchosporium secalis in Alberta. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 24:176-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660309506993
  15. Tekauz, A. 1991. Pathogenic variation in Rhynchosporium secalis on barley in Canada. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 13:298-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060669109500915
  16. Yahyaoui, A. H. 2003. Occurrence of barley leaf blight diseases in Central West Asia and North Africa. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Barley Leaf Blights, 7-11 April (2002) ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria. Yahyaoui AH, Brader L., Tekauz A., Wallwork H., Steffenson B (eds.). p. 463.
  17. Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
  18. Zaffarano, P. L., McDonald, B. A., Zala, Z. and Linde, C. C. 2006. Global Hierarchical Gene Diversity Analysis Suggests the Fertile Crescent Is Not the Center of Origin of the Barley Scald Pathogen Rhynchosporium secalis. Phytopathology 96: 941-950. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-0941

Cited by

  1. Transcriptome Analysis of the Barley-Rhynchosporium secalis Interaction vol.30, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.04.2014.0033
  2. Transcriptome profiling reveals distinct gene activations in barley responding to scald and spot blotch vol.46, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.46.2018.034