DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study of the immunosuppressive activity of methanolic extract of Madhuca longifolia (Koenig)

  • V., Chitra (SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM University) ;
  • Ganesh, Dhawle (SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM University) ;
  • Shrinivas, Sharma (SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM University)
  • Received : 2009.05.26
  • Accepted : 2010.06.23
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

The immunosuppressive activity of the Methanol extract of bark of Madhuca longifolia (Koenig) consisting of a mixture of saponins, flavonoids, tannins, steroids, phenol and glycosides was studied on the immune responses in mice. Methanol extract of Madhuca longifolia (MLL) was administered orally at doses of 50, 100 and 150 mg/kg/day to healthy mice divided into four groups consisting of six animals each. The assessment of immunomodulatory activity was carried out by testing the humoral (antibody titre) and cellular (foot pad swelling) immune responses to the antigenic challenge by sheep RBCs. Furthermore, the effect on hematological parameters as well as relative organ weight was determined. On oral administration MML showed a significant decrease delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) response whereas the humoral response to sheep RBCs was unaffected. Thus MLL significantly suppressed the cellular immunity by decreasing the footpad thickness response to sheep RBCs in sensitized mice. With a dose of 100 and 150 mg/kg/day the DTH response was $7.66{\pm}2.75$ and $6.41{\pm}1.21$ respectively in comparison to corresponding value of $14.50{\pm}2.38$ for untreated control group. These differences in DTH response were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The study demonstrates that MLL shows preferential suppression of the components of cell-mediated immunity and shows no effect on the humoral immunity.

Keywords

References

  1. Agarwal SS, Singh VK. (1999) Immunomodulators: A review of studies on Indian medicinal plants and synthetic peptides: Part I. Medicinal plants. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy B. 65, 179–204.
  2. Medscape Today resources page. Medscape Web site. Available at: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/416381_1.
  3. Mitra SK, Gupta M, Sarma DNK. (1999) Immunomodulatory effect of IM-133. Phytother. Res. 13, 341-343. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1573(199906)13:4<341::AID-PTR410>3.0.CO;2-6
  4. Nadkarni AK. (1954) Indian Materia Medica, pp.181,3rd ed. Vol.1, Bombay Popular Book Depot. India.
  5. Puri A, Saxena R, Saxena RP, (1993) Saxena KCImmunostimulant agents from Andrographis paniculata. J. Nat. Prod. 56, 995-999. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50097a002
  6. Ramadan MF, Sharanabasappa G, Paramjyothi S, Seshagiri M, Moersel JT (2005) Profile and levels of fatty acids and bioactive constituents in mahua butter from fruit-seeds of buttercup tree [Madhuca Longifolia (Koening)]. Eur. Food Res. Technol. DOI 10.1007/s 00217–005-0155-2.
  7. Sen P, Mendiratta PK, Ray A. (1992) Effects of Azadirachta indica on some biochemical, immunological and visceral parameters in normal and stressed rats. Indian. J. Exp. Biol. 30, 1170-1175.
  8. Serkova N, Brand A, Christians U, Leibfritz D. (1996) Evaluation of the effects of immunosuppressants on neuronal and glial cells in vitro by multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1314, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4889(96)00081-X
  9. Varier PSV. (1995) Indian Medicinal Plant, pp.362, Vol.3. Arya Vaidyasala Kottakkal, Orient Longman.
  10. Vyas OS, Acharya RP, Dadhich AP, Godhroani JL, Purohit VS (1983) Effect of Allium cepa (onion) on immune responses in rabbit. Indian J. Pharmacol. 27, 259–260.
  11. (2003) Waldmann HThe new immunosuppression. Curr. Opin. Chem. Bio. 7, 476–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(03)00076-0
  12. Zhu XY. (1990) Immunosuppressive effect of cultured Cordyceps sinensis cellular immune response. Chung-Hsi-Chieh-Ho-Tsa-Tsa-Chin. 10, 485–487.