The Comparison of Characteristics of Foot pressure between Treadmill and Ground walking in Normal person

정상인의 평지보행과 트레드밀 보행 시 족저압의 특성 비교

  • Kim, Ji-Hye (Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation and Healthy Science, Graduate School of Yongin University) ;
  • Oh, Tae-Young (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical life science, Silla University)
  • 김지혜 (용인대학교 재활보건과학대학원 물리치료) ;
  • 오태영 (신라대학교 의생명과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2010.01.17
  • Accepted : 2010.02.24
  • Published : 2010.02.28

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study is to compare the distribution of foot pressure, knee and ankle joint angle between treadmill walking and ground walking in normal person. Methods : 18 Person of subject has participated this study, let subject to walk in ground and treadmill in order to gain data of foot distribution and knee, ankle joint angle using by parotec system. and Dartfish system. Walking velocity was constrained by 2Km/h and more 10sec. Date analysis was used by paired-t test using SPSS/PC statistical programs for window. Results : Result show that total contact times has shown symmetry between both legs, and more increase of left foot pressure in treadmill walking. Foot pressure of treadmill walking was significantly decreased in right hind foot and fore foot and hallux area. The ankle joint angle of treadmill walking was significantly decreased in initial contact phase. Conclusion : Results of this study show that foot pressure of treadmill walking was more decreased than ground walking in right hind foot and fore foot, hallux area. And the ankle joint angle of treadmill walking was significantly decreased in initial contact phase.

Keywords

References

  1. 권혁철, 김인숙. 독립보행이 가능한 편마비 환자의하지 체중지지 특성에 관한 고찰. 대한물리치료학회지, 1988;9(1):1-11.
  2. 김좌준, 노민희, 구봉오 등. 속도-의존적 체중지지 트레드밀 보행이 뇌졸중 환자의 보행에 미치는영향. 대한물리치료학회지. 2005;17(3):339-350.
  3. 노정석, 김택훈. Parotec system을 이용한 족저압 측정의 신뢰도. 한국전문물리치료학회지. 2001;8(3):35-41.
  4. 조규권, 김유신. 트레드밀 보행 시 경사도와 속도에 따른 보행 형태의 운동학적 분석. 한국운동역학회지. 2001;11(2):175-191.
  5. Bean J.C, Chaffin C.B, Schultz A.B. Biomechanical model calculation of muscle contraction forces: a double Linear programming method. J Biomech. 1988;21(1):59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(88)90192-3
  6. Bohannon RW. Gait performance of hemiparetic stroke patients: selected variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68(11):777-781.
  7. Bowker P, Messenger N. The measurement of gait. Clin Rehabil. 1988;2(2):89-97.
  8. Crowninshield RD, Brand RA. A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech. 1981;14(11):93-801.
  9. Dimitrigevic MR, Larsson LE.. Neural control of gait: clinical neruophysiological Appl Neurophysiol. 1981;44(1-3):152-159.
  10. Glitsch U, Baumann W. The three-dimensional determination of internal loads in the lower extremity. J Biomech.1997;30(11):1123-1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00089-4
  11. Goldberg EJ, Kautz SA., Neptune RR. Can treadmill walking be used to assess propulsion generation. J Biomech. 2008;41(8):1805-1808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.009
  12. Gottschall JS., Kram R. Ground reaction forces during downhill and uphill running. J Biomech. 2005;38(3): 445-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.04.023
  13. Hamil J, Bates BT, Kinneth HG. Timing of lower extremity joint actions during treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 1992;24(7):807-813
  14. Herzog W. Individual muscle force estimations using a non-liner optimal design. J Neurosci Methods. 1987;21:167-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0270(87)90114-2
  15. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke M.T. Treadmill training with partial weight bearing support compared with physiotherapy nonambulatory hemiparetic patient. Stroke, 1995;26:976-981. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.6.976
  16. Inman VT. Human locomotion. Can Med Assoc J. 1966;94:1047-1054.
  17. Kernozek TW, LaMott EE. Comparison of plantar pressure between the eldery and young adults. Gait Posture. 1995;3(1):31-48.
  18. Miller EW, Quinn ME, Seddon PG. Body weight support treadmill and overground ambulation training for two patient with chronic disability secondary to stroke. Phys ther. 2002;82(1):53-61
  19. Pedersen DR, Brand RA, Cheng C et al. Direct comparison of muscle force predictions using linear and nonlinerar programming. J Biomech Eng. 1987;109(3):192-198. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138669
  20. Pedotti A, Krishnan VV, Stark L. Optimization of muscle force sequencing in human locomotion. Math Biosci. 1978;38(1-2):57-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(78)90018-4
  21. Perry J. Gait analysis. New Jersey. Slack. 1992.
  22. Pierrynowski MR, Morrison JB. Estimating the muscle forces generated in the human lower extremity when walking; A physiological solution. Math Biosci. 1985;75(1):43-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(85)90066-5
  23. Seireg A, Arvikar RJ. The prediction of muscular load sharing and joint forces in the lower extremities during walking. J Biomechanics. 1975;8(2):89-102 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(75)90089-5
  24. Silver KH., Marko RF, Forrest LW et al. Effect of aerobic treadmill training on gait velocity, cadence, and gait symmetry in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a preliminary report. Neurorehabil Neural repair, 2000;14(1):65-71 https://doi.org/10.1177/154596830001400108
  25. Simoneau GG. Kinesiology of Walking. In: Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System. Mosby. 2002.