Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

The Korean Neurosurgical Society (대한신경외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Use of Pedicle Screw-Rod System for the Posterior Fixation in Cervico-Thoracic Junction

  • Cho, Won-ik (Department of Neurosurgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Science) ;
  • Eid, Ahmed Shawky (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ain Shams University) ;
  • Chang, Ung-Kyu (Department of Neurosurgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Science)
  • Received : 2010.04.26
  • Accepted : 2010.06.29
  • Published : 2010.07.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : In cervico-thoracic junction (CTJ), the use of strong fixation device such as pedicle screw-rod system is often required. Purpose of this study is to analyze the anatomical features of C7 and T1 pedicles related to screw insertion and to evaluate the safety of pedicle screw insertion at these levels. Methods : Nineteen patients underwent posterior CTJ fixation with C7 and/or T1 included in fixation levels. Seventeen patients had tumorous conditions and two with post-laminectomy kyphosis. The anatomical features were analyzed for C7 and T1 pedicles in 19 patients using computerized tomography (CT). Pedicle screw and rod fixation system was used in 16 patients. Pedicle violation by screws was evaluated with postoperative CT scan. Results : The mean values of the width, height, stable depth, safety angle, transverse angle, and sagittal angle of C7 pedicles were $6.9{\pm}1.34\;mm$, $8.23{\pm}1.18\;mm$, $30.93{\pm}4.65\;mm$, $26.42{\pm}7.91$ degrees, $25.9{\pm}4.83$ degrees, and $10.6{\pm}3.39$ degrees. At T1 pedicles, anatomic parameters were similar to those of C7. The pedicle violation revealed that 64.1% showed grade I violation and 35.9% showed grade II violation, overall. As for C7 pedicle screw insertion, grade I was 61.5% and grade II 38.5%. At T1 level, grade I was 65.0% and grade II 35.0%. There was no significant difference in violation rate between the whole group, C7, and T1 group. Conclusion : C7 pedicles can withstand pedicle screw insertion. C7 pedicle and T1 pedicle are anatomically very similar. With the use of adequate fluoroscopic oblique view, pedicle screw can be safely inserted at C7 and T1 levels.

Keywords

References

  1. Abumi K, Shono Y, Ito M, Taneichi H, Kotani Y, Kaneda K : Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 : 962-969, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200004150-00011
  2. An HS, Vaccaro A, Cotler JM, Lin S : Spinal disorders at the cervicothoracic junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 : 2557-2564, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199411001-00011
  3. An HS, Wise JJ, Xu R : Anatomy of the cervicothoracic junction : a study of cadaveric dissection, cryomicrotomy, and magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord 12 : 519-525, 1999
  4. Barrey C, Cotton F, Jund J, Mertens P, Perrin G : Transpedicular screwing of the seventh cervical vertebra : anatomical considerations and surgical technique. Surg Radiol Anat 25 : 354-360, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0163-5
  5. Bueff HU, Lotz JC, Colliou OK, Khapchik V, Ashford F, Hu SS, et al. : Instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction after destabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 : 1789-1792, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199508150-00007
  6. Cha SH, Kim C, Choi BK, Kim HJ, Baek SY : C-arm assessment of cervical pedicle screw : screw coaxial fluoroscopy and oblique view. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 : 1721-1727, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180b9f29b
  7. Chapman JR, Anderson PA, Pepin C, Toomey S, Newell DW, Grady MS : Posterior instrumentation of the unstable cervicothoracic spine. J Neurosurg 84 : 552-558, 1996 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1996.84.4.0552
  8. Choueka J, Spivak JM, Kummer FJ, Steger T : Flexion failure of posterior cervical lateral mass screws. Influence of insertion technique and position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 : 462-468, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199602150-00010
  9. Ebraheim NA, Jabaly G, Xu R, Yeasting RA : Anatomic relations of the thoracic pedicle to the adjacent neural structures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22 : 1553-1556; discussion 1557, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199707150-00002
  10. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Knight T, Yeasting RA : Morphometric evaluation of lower cervical pedicle and its projection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22 : 1-6, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199701010-00001
  11. Graham AW, Swank ML, Kinard RE, Lowery GL, Dials BE : Posterior cervical arthrodesis and stabilization with a lateral mass plate. Clinical and computed tomographic evaluation of lateral mass screw placement and associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 : 323-328; discussion 329, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199602010-00014
  12. Hong JT, Yi JS, Kim JT, Ji C, Ryu KS, Park CK : Clinical and radiologic outcome of laminar screw at C2 and C7 for posterior instrumentation-review of 25 cases and comparison of C2 and C7 intralaminar screw fixation. Surg Neurol 2009 [Epub ahead of print]
  13. Inoue A, Ikata T, Katoh S : Spinal deformity following surgery for spinal cord tumors and tumorous lesions : analysis based on an assessment of the spinal functional curve. Spinal Cord 34 : 536-542, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.97
  14. Jeanneret B, Magerl F, Ward EH, Ward JC : Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16 : S56-S63, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199103001-00010
  15. Jones EL, Heller JG, Silcox DH, Hutton WC : Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22 : 977-982, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199705010-00009
  16. Karaikovic EE, Daubs MD, Madsen RW, Gaines RW Jr : Morphologic characteristics of human cervical pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22 : 493-500, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199703010-00005
  17. Kotani Y, Cunningham BW, Abumi K, McAfee PC : Biomechanical analysis of cervical stabilization systems. An assessment of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 : 2529-2539, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199411001-00007
  18. Kreshak JL, Kim DH, Lindsey DP, Kam AC, Panjabi MM, Yerby SA : Posterior stabilization at the cervicothoracic junction. A biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 2763-2770, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200212150-00005
  19. Le H, Balabhadra R, Park J, Kim D : Surgical treatment of tumors involving the cervicothoracic junction. Neurosurg Focus 15 : E3, 2003
  20. Lee GY, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR : Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement : a comparison of the "open" lamino-foraminotomy and computer-assisted techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 20 : 25-32, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000211239.21835.ad
  21. Ludwig SC, Kowalski JM, Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG : Cervical pedicle screws : comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 : 2675-2681, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200010150-00022
  22. Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA, Vaccaro AR, Foley KF, Albert TJ : Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine : comparative accuracy of three techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 : 1655-1667, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200007010-00009
  23. Mazel C, Hoffmann E, Antonietti P, Grunenwald D, Henry M, Williams J : Posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation in spine tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29 : 1246-1253, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200406010-00015
  24. Miller RM, Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Yeasting RA : Anatomic consideration of transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine. An analysis of two approaches. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 : 2317-2322, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199610150-00003
  25. Reinhold M, Magerl F, Rieger M, Blauth M : Cervical pedicle screw placement : feasibility and accuracy of two new insertion techniques based on morphometric data. Eur Spine J 16 : 47-56, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0104-1
  26. Sapkas G, Papadakis S, Katonis P, Roidis N, Kontakis G : Operative treatment of unstable injuries of the cervicothoracic junction. Eur Spine J 8 : 279-283, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050174
  27. Seo YJ, Song GS, Cho WH, Choi BK, Cha SH, Baek SY : Comparison of three different techniques in cervical transpedicular screw insertion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 39 : 360-365, 2006
  28. Stulik J, Vyskocil T, Sebesta P, Kryl J, Pafko P : [Surgical treatment for disorders of the cervicothoracic junction region.] Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 72 : 213-220, 2005
  29. Ugur HC, Attar A, Uz A, Tekdemir I, Egemen N, Caglar S, et al. : Surgical anatomic evaluation of the cervical pedicle and adjacent neural structures. Neurosurgery 47 : 1162-1168; discussion 1168-1169, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200011000-00029
  30. Wang MY : Cervical crossing laminar screws : early clinical results and complications. Neurosurgery 61 : 311-315; discussion 315-316, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000303987.49870.7b
  31. Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting R, Wong F, Jackson WT : Anatomy of C7 lateral mass and projection of pedicle axis on its posterior aspect. J Spinal Disord 8 : 116-120, 1995

Cited by

  1. Construct Type and Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis at the Cervicothoracic Junction : vol.40, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000868
  2. Impact of dynamic alignment, motion, and center of rotation on myelopathy grade and regional disability in cervical spondylotic myelopathy vol.23, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.2.spine14414
  3. Reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in posterior cervicothoracic fusions with and without bone morphogenetic protein in a cohort of 450 patients vol.25, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.1.spine151330
  4. Easy method to simplify “freehand” subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion vol.8, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_92_17