The relationship between prediction accuracy and pre-information in collaborative filtering system

  • Kim, Sun-Ok (School of Information Communication and Broadcasting Engineering, Halla University)
  • Received : 2010.06.02
  • Accepted : 2010.07.19
  • Published : 2010.07.31

Abstract

This study analyzes the characteristics of preference ratings by dividing estimated values into four groups according to rank correlation coefficient after obtaining preference estimated value to user's ratings by using collaborative filtering algorithm. It is known that the value of standard error of skewness and standard error of kurtosis lower in the group of higher rank correlation coefficient This explains that the preference of higher rank correlation coefficient has lower extreme values and the differences of preference rating values. In addition, top n recommendation lists are made after obtaining rank fitting by using the result ranks of prediction value and the ranks of real rated values, and this top n is applied to the four groups. The value of top n recommendation is calculated higher in the group of higher rank correlation coefficient, and the recommendation accuracy in the group of higher rank correlation coefficient is higher than that in the group of lower rank correlation coefficient Thus, when using standard error of skewness and standard error of kurtosis in recommender system, rank correlation coefficient can be higher, and so the accuracy of recommendation prediction can be increased.

Keywords

References

  1. Herlocker, J., Konstan, J., Terveen, L. J. and Riedl, J. (2004). Evaluating collaborative ltering recom- mender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22, 5-53. https://doi.org/10.1145/963770.963772
  2. Kim, S. O. (2008). Improving the MAE by removing lower rated Items in recommender system. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 19, 819-830.
  3. Kim, S. O., Lee, S. J. and Lee, H. C. (2008). A study on improvement of prediction accuracy by critical value. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 10, 591-601.
  4. Konstan, B., Miller, D., Herlocker, J., Gordon, L. and Riedl, J. (1997). GroupLens: Applying collaborative ltering to usenet news. Communications of the ACM, 40, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1145/245108.245126
  5. Lee, H. C. (2006a). A study on the rank tting of the recommender system for Top-N recommender. Journal of Korean Data & Information Science, 8, 2597-2607.
  6. Lee, H. C. (2006b). On the e ect of signi cance of correlation coecient for recommender system. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 17, 1129-1139.
  7. Lee, H. C. (2007). A study on the Top-N using the improved algorithm in the collaborative ltering. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 9, 491-500.
  8. Lee, H. C. (2008). A study on the relationship between sparsity and Top-N recommendation in the recom- mender system. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 11, 2389-2399.
  9. Lee, H. C. (2009a). The characteristic of response and Top-N accuracy in collaborative ltering of recom- mender system. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 11, 2919-2930.
  10. Lee, S. J., Kim, S. O. and Lee, H. C. (2007a). Pre-evaluation for detecting abnormal users in recommender system. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 18, 619-628.
  11. Lee, S, J., Kim, S. O. and Lee, H. C. (2007b). The relationship of prediction accuracy and the run of abnormal user's ratings in collaborative ltering. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 9, 2043-2054.
  12. Lee, S. J., Kim, S. O. and Lee, H. C. (2007c). A study on the interrelationship between the prediction error and the rating's pattern in collaborative. Journal of Korean Data & Information Science, 18, 659-668.
  13. Pazzani, M. J. (1999). Framework for collaborative. Content Based and Demographic Filtering, Artificial Intelligent Review, 394-408.
  14. Resnick, P. N., Iacovou, M., Bergstrom, P., Bergstrom, J. and Riedl, J. (1994). GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 175-186.
  15. Resnick, P. and Varian, H. R. (1997). Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40, 56-58.
  16. Sarwar, B. M., Karypis, G., Konstan, J. and Riedl, J. (2000). Analysis of recommender algorithms for e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 2st ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 158-167.
  17. Yang, K. M., Lee, H. C. and Park, Y. S. (2008). The feature of preference prediction by memory-based collaborative algorithm. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 10, 591-601.