The Effect of General Coordinative Manipulation Intervention Models on the Balanced Restoration of Muscles of the Extremities

전신조정술 중재 모형이 사지 근육의 균형 회복에 미치는 효과

  • Moon, Sang-Eun (Department of Physical Therapy, University of Masan)
  • Received : 2009.11.18
  • Accepted : 2010.03.08
  • Published : 2010.04.25

Abstract

Purpose: This study was designed to determine whether General Coordinative Manipulation (GCM) Intervention Models have effects on the balanced restoration of asymmetrical muscles in the extremities. Methods: Fifty-nine healthy subjects (1st hypothesis: n=40, 2nd hypothesis: n=19) participated in studies using the two GCM intervention models. Subjects were studied 2 times a week for 3 weeks. Electromyography (EMG) was used to measure muscle activity, and measurements were performed before and after the application of the each intervention model. Results: Hypothesis 1: GCM Intervention, which coordinates flexion types of muscle contractions of the upper extremity and extension types of muscle contractions of the lower extremity (excluding self-care) is effective for treating shows the treatment in efficiency on more than two 2 of 3 muscles (vastus medialis, gastrocnemius medial, and deltoid middle) and the effects affects on more than 3 types of 4 body types (Vastus medialis, Gastrocnemius medial of Body type III, p<0.05). GCM body type was classified by the relative tilting of right and left scapulars and iliums into four groups. Hypothesis 2: GCM Intervention, which coordinates flexion types of muscle contractions of the lower extremity and extension types of muscle contractions of the upper extremity (excluding self-care) is effective for treating more than two 2 of 3 muscles (vastus medialis, gastrocnemius medial, and deltoid middle) and the effects affects on more than 2 types of 3 body types (p>0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Stephane P, Michel R, Clermont D et al. An interdisciplinary clinical practice model for the management of low-back pain in primary care: the CLIP project. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-54
  2. Liebenson C. Rehabilitation of the spine. Seoul, Pureunsol Pub, 2000:15-22.
  3. Moon SE. General coordinative manipulation. Seoul, Jungdam Media Pub, 2004:30-83.
  4. Moon SE, Kim MH, Ju WS et al. The effects of general coordinative manipulation interventions on the postural control. J Kor Acu & Mox. 2009;26(5):137-49.
  5. Moon SE. The diagnosis and treatment of low back pain based on General coordinative manipulation. Seoul, Kyunghee University Pub, 1996:165-214.
  6. Kim K, Ko JY, Lee SY. A study on the characteristics of gait in patients with chronic low backpain. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2009;21(2):79-85.
  7. Moon SE. A new approach to the whole body intervention program (WBIP) of non-specific back disorders. 14th International WCPT Congress 2003-Abstracts, Barcelona, Spain, 2003:SI-PL-0827.
  8. Moon SE. Joe HR, Oh CS et al. Sasang constitution classification related to an aspect of distribution general coordinative manipulation body type and experimental study based on the character of static posture and dynamic hyper/hypo-mobility pattern. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2005;17(4):505-17.
  9. Debora BG, Vanessa MP, Rodrigo AV at el. The effect of hip abduction on the EMG activity of vastus medialis obliquus, vastus lateralis longus and vastus lateralis obliquus in healthy subjects. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2006;3:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-3-13
  10. Lee MK, Kim JM, Kim WH. The effects of PNF leg patterns on activation of biceps and triceps in stroke patients. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2009;21(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.21.1
  11. Geiringer SR. Anatomic localization for needle electromyography. 2nd ed. Seoul, Yeongmun Pub, 1999: 52-133.
  12. Hung YI, Gross MT. Effect of foot position on electromyographic activity of the vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis during lower-extremity weight-bearing activities. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29(2):93-102. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1999.29.2.93
  13. Kim DY, Kim SH, Lim YE et al. Effect of EMG biofeedback training and taping on vastus medialis oblique for function improvement of patient with patella malalignment. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2008;20(3):35-44.
  14. Han KJ, Choi BK. Comparison of the surface EMG signal of progressive resistance increase and progressive resistance decrease exercise. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2008;20(1):11-6.
  15. O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ. Physical rehabilitation: Assessment and treatment. 4th ed. Philadelphia, FA Davis Co, 2000:117-20.
  16. Nardone A, Schieppati M. Postural adjustments associated with voluntary contraction of leg muscles in standing man. Exp Brain Res. 1988;69(3):469-80.
  17. Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ. Muscles alive: Their function revealed by electromyography. 5th ed. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1985:22-5.
  18. Nardone A, Corra T, Schieppati M. Different activations of the soleus and gastrocnemii muscles in response to various types of stance perturbation in man. Exp Brain Res. 1990;80(2):323-32.
  19. Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. Seoul, Hyunmun Pub, 1998:794.
  20. Garnett RA, O'Donovan MJ, Stephens JA et al. Motor unit organization of human medial gastrocnemius. J Physiol. 1979;287:33-43. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012643
  21. Dietz V, Quintern J, Berger W et al. Cerebral potentials and leg muscle electromyographic responses associated with stance perturbation. Exp Brain Res. 1985;57(2):348-54.
  22. Shumway-Cook A, Woolacott MH. Motor control: Theory and practical application. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1995:396-403.
  23. Yi CH, Koo AR, Roh JS. The effects of straight leg raising exercise and quadriceps setting exercise on electromyographic activity of the quadriceps muscle. KAUTPT. 1997;4(1):1-10.
  24. Kendall FP. Muscles: testing and function with posture and pain. 5th ed. Seoul, Hanmi Medical Pub, 2006:315.