Stability and Safety Analysis on the Next Generation High-Speed Railway Vehicle

차세대 고속철도의 안정성 및 안전성 해석

  • 조재익 (아주대학교 공과대학 기계공학과) ;
  • 박태원 (아주대학교 공과대학 기계공학과) ;
  • 윤지원 (아주대학교 자동차부품혁신연구센터) ;
  • 김지영 (아주대학교 공과대학 기계공학과) ;
  • 김영국 (한국철도기술연구원)
  • Received : 2010.03.11
  • Accepted : 2010.04.20
  • Published : 2010.06.26

Abstract

In this work, the stability and safety analysis are carried out to predict the performance of a next generation high-speed railway vehicle (HEMU-400X). Since the safety of the high-speed railway vehicles is very important, it is meaningful to predict the dynamic performance and stability of the railway vehicles using a numerical model at a railway vehicle design step. The critical speed of the dynamic model depending on the conicity of the wheel is calculated in the stability analysis. The critical speed calculated in this analysis is over 400km/h for the conicity value of 0.15, which is determined on the basis of representative international standard, UIC 518. Also, the lateral and vertical accelerations at several points of the same dynamic model are calculated for the safety analysis. In the simulation, the dynamic model runs at the test speed of 440km/h, which is determined considering a maximum target speed, and the total driving distance is 30km. And those estimated values are less than the allowed maximum acceleration values of UIC 518.

본 논문에서는 안정성과 안전성 해석을 통하여 차세대 고속철도(HEMU-400X)의 주행성능을 예측하였다. 차량의 설계단계에서 주행성능을 예측하는 것은 차량의 안전 확보를 위해 매우 중요하다. 안정성 해석을 통하여 차륜의 등가 답면구배에 따른 임계속도를 계산하였다. 임계속도는 UIC518에 근거하여 등가 답면구배 0.15에서 400km/h가 달성 가능함을 보였다. 또한 안전성 해석을 통하여, 동역학 모델의 횡방향과 수직방향의 가속도 값을 시뮬레이션 하였다. 안정성 해석은 UIC518에 근거하여 440km/h의 속도로 30km의 구간을 주행하였다. 그리고 계산된 값들은 모두 UIC518의 최대 허용 가속도 값보다 적게 나타나는 것을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. K.H. Kim, C.K. Park, S.W. Kim (2006) A progressive course of the next generation high-speed rail development project, 2006 Autumn Conf. Korean Society for Railway, pp. 7-12.
  2. D.H. Song, K.H. Min (2008) Study on the key technologies for performance and operation of the high-speed EMU, 2008 Spring Conf. Korean Society for Railway, pp. 1214-1219.
  3. C.K. Park, Y.G. Kim, K.H. Kim, Y.M. Kim (2008) Analysis of the suspension characteristics for next generation high speed train formed with 6 cars in concept design stage, 2008 Autumn Conf. Korean Society for Railway, pp. 387-392.
  4. C.K. Park, Y.G. Kim, K.H. Kim (2008) Analysis of the suspension characteristics for next generation high speed train on the view of concept design, 2008 Spring Conf. Korean Society for Railway, pp. 824-829.
  5. B. M. Eickhoff (1995) Railway Vehicle Dynamics Course, British Railways Board, No. RR-DYN-95-166, Section 4, pp. 1-7.
  6. UIC code 518 OR (2003) Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behaviour- Safety-Track fatigue-Ride quality.
  7. K.W. Lee, K.B. Park, H.J. Yang (2005) The review and application of UIC 518 standard regarding railway vehicle dynamic performances, 2005 Autumn Conf. Korean Society for Railway, pp. 38-43.
  8. UIC code 519 OR (2004) Method for determining the equivalent conicity.
  9. Attivissimo, F. Danese, A. Giaquinto, N. Sforza, P. (2007) A railway measurement system to evaluate the wheel–rail interaction quality, Trans. on IEEE, 56(Issue 5), pp. 1583-1589.
  10. C.K. Park, K.H. Kim, Y.G. Kim, S.W. Kim, J.Y. Mok (2006) Estimation of the dynamic behavior for korean high speed train at 350km/h using the accelerations according to the UIC code 518OR, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 9(5), pp. 544-549.
  11. Y.G. Kim (2003) Design optimization of suspension using neural network and performance evaluation for the high speed Train, Dissertation, Ajou University, pp. 11-23.