한국철도학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean Society for Railway)

  • 제13권3호
  • /
  • Pages.327-332
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1738-6225(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2235(eISSN)
한국철도학회 (The Korean Society for Railway)
권호 표지

화물품목의 중요도를 반영한 철도화물취급역의 효율성 평가

Assessing the Efficiency of Freight Railroad Stations Reflecting Freight Item Importance Weights

  • 투고 : 2010.02.17
  • 심사 : 2010.05.18
  • 발행 : 2010.06.26
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문에서는 다수의 성과지표를 동시에 고려하며 각 역의 운영조건을 반영하고 더불어 화물품목의 중요도를 반영하여 각 화물취급역의 성과를 평가하는 방안을 제안하였다. 본 논문에서는 187개 화물취급역에 대해서 품목별 '발송규모'와 '도착규모'를 성과지표로 사용하고 각 역의 '화물인력'과 '유치가능량'을 운영조건지 표로 사용하며 품목별 중요도를 확신영역 제약조건으로 반영하는 자료포락분석으로 효율성을 평가하였다. 이러한 결과는 철도경영자 또는 철도정책담당자의 경영전략이나 정책의사결정에 유용한 정보로 사용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

In this paper we presents an approach to assessing the efficiency of freight railroad stations reflecting freight item importance weights with multiple performance indicators and multiple operational condition indicators. We evaluate 187 freight railroad stations using data envelopment analysis with assurance region. Each freight item's loading/unloading volume is used as a performance indicator. Freight labor and yard capacity are used as operational condition indicators. Freight item importance weights are reflected to the data envelopment analysis as assurance region. The evaluation results facilitates the organization's decision making by providing valuable information.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S-H. Kim, S-M. Oh (2009) Evaluating the performance of freight railway stations using data envelopment analysis, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 12(2), pp. 315-320.
  2. C.-W. Ahn, H.-G. Ha (2009) An analysis of the efficiency of Korean railroad container freight station with data envelopment analysis - assurance region (DEA-AR), Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, 27(2), pp. 315-320.
  3. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper (1962) Programming with linear fractional functionals, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3/ 4), pp. 181-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800090303
  4. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, E.L. Rhodes (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), pp. 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  5. W.D. Cook, M. Kress (1990) A data envelopment model for aggregating preference ranking, Management Science, 36(11), pp. 1302-1310. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.11.1302
  6. B. Golany (1988) A note on including ordinal relations among multipliers in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 34(8), pp. 1029-1033. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.8.1029
  7. R.H. Green, J.R. Doyle, W.D. Cook (1996) Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation, European Journal of Operational Research, 90(3), pp. 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00039-9
  8. T.R. Sexton, R.H. Silkman, A.J. Hogan (1986) Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extentions, in R. H. Silkman, ed., Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 73-105.