The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Noncompliance screw supported maxillary molar distalization in a parallel manner

미니스크류를 이용한 상악구치부 후방이동장치 효과

  • Nalcaci, Ruhi (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University, King Saud University) ;
  • Bicakci, Ali Altug (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University) ;
  • Ozan, Fatih (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University)
  • Received : 2010.02.25
  • Accepted : 2010.04.26
  • Published : 2010.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: Intraoral noncompliance upper molar distalization techniques have gained in popularity and have subsequently found to be successful in Class II correction. The aim of the present study was to introduce a screw supported intraoral distalization appliance and investigate its efficiency. Methods: Twenty-one subjects (11 females, 10 males; average age of 14.9 years) with Angle Class II malocclusion participated in this study. Two screws were inserted behind the incisive foramen and immediately loaded to distalize the upper first molars. An intraoral screw supported distalization appliance was used to distalize the upper molars in order to achieve a Class I molar relationship. Skeletal and dental changes were evaluated using cephalometric and three-dimensional (3D) model analysis. Results: Upper molars were distalized 3.95 mm on average and a Class I molar relationship was achieved without any anchorage loss. The upper molars were tipped only $1.49^{\circ}$ and the upper right and left molars were rotated only $0.54^{\circ}$ and $0.74^{\circ}$ respectively which were statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The newly designed screw supported noncompliance distalization appliance was found to be an effective device for achieving bodily molar distalization without any anchorage loss.

상악 구치의 후방이동을 위한 구강 내 장치 중 환자의 협조를 필요로 하지 않는 방법은 제II급 부정교합의 개선에 성공적으로 널리 사용되고 있다. 본 연구는 스크류에 의해 지지되는 구강 내 후방이동 장치를 소개하고 그 효율성을 조사하고자 하였다. Angle Class II 부정교합으로 진단된 21명의 환자(여자 11명, 남자 10명; 평균 연령 14.9세)를 대상으로 하였다. 2개의 스크류를 incisive foramen 후방에 식립하고, 식립한 즉시 힘을 주어 상악 제1대구치의 후방이동에 사용하였다. 상악 구치를 후방이동시켜 제I급 구치관계를 얻기 위해 스크류에 의해 지지되는 구강 내 후방이동 장치를 사용하였다. 치료 전후 측모두부 방사선 사진과 3차원 모델 분석을 통해 골격 및 치아의 변화를 평가하였다. 연구결과 상악 구치는 평균 3.95 mm 후방이동하였고, 추가적인 고정원 소실 없이 제I급 구치관계를 확립하였다. 상악 대구치는 $1.49^{\circ}$ 후방경사 되었고, 회전된 정도는 좌우 각각 $0.74^{\circ}$, $0.54^{\circ}$으로 통계적으로 유의성 있는 변화를 보이지 않았다 (p > 0.05). 새롭게 고안된 장치는 스크류에 의해 지지되어 환자의 협조도를 요하지 않으며 특별한 고정원 소실 없이 구치의 치체이동을 통한 후방이동을 얻는 데 효과적인 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kircelli BH, Pekias ZO, Kircelli C. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance. Angle Orthod 2006;76:650-9.
  2. Papadopoulos MA. Orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofae Orthop 2008;134:604.e1-e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.013
  3. Gulati S, Kharbanda OP, Parkash H. Dental and skeletal changes after intraoral molar distalization with sectional jig assembly. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:319-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70215-X
  4. Gelgor IE, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman AI, Dolanmaz D, Kalayci A. Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalization. Angle Orthod 2004;74:838-50.
  5. Angelieri F, Almeida RR, Almeida MR, Fuziy A. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:520-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.003
  6. Keles A, Saymsu K. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70246-0
  7. Keles A, Erverdi N, Sezen S. Bodily distalization of molars with absolute anchorage. Angle Orthod 2003;73:471-82.
  8. Bolla E, Muratore F, Carano A, Bowman SJ. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods. Angle Orthod 2002;72: 481-94.
  9. Escobar SA, Tellez PA, Moncada CA, Villegas CA, Latorre CM, Oberti G. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: a clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:545-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.012
  10. Chiu PP, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:353-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.031
  11. Doruk C, Agar U, Babacan H. The role of the headgear timer in extraoral co-operation. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:289-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.3.289
  12. Agar U, Doruk C, Bicakci AA, Bukusoglu N. The role of psycho- social factors in headgear compliance. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27:263-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji001
  13. Locatelli R, Bednar J, Dietz VS, Gianelly AA. Molar distalization with superelastic NiTi wire. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:277-9.
  14. Wilson WL, Wilson RC. Multi-directional 3D functional Class II treatment. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:186-9.
  15. Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:706-14.
  16. Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110:639-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80041-2
  17. Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation. Angle Orthod 1997;67:249-60.
  18. Kinzinger GS, Fritz UB, Sander FG, Diedrich PR. Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:8-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.02.002
  19. Jones RD, White JM. Rapid Class II molar correction with an open coil jig. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:661-4.
  20. Runge ME, Martin JT, Bukai F. Analysis of rapid maxillary molar distal movement without patient cooperation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:153-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70343-4
  21. Carano A, Testa M. The distal jet for upper molar distalization. J Clin Orthod 1996;30:374-80.
  22. Ngantung V, Nanda RS, Bowman SJ. Posttreatment evaluation of the distal jet appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:178-85. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.114645
  23. Keles A. Maxillary unilateral molar distalization with sliding mechanics: a preliminary investigation. Eur J Orthod 2001;23: 507-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/23.5.507
  24. Keles A, Pamukcu B, Tokmak EC. Bilateral maxillary molar distalization with sliding mechanics: Keles slider. World J Orthod 2002;3:57-66.
  25. Bjork A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 1983;5: 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/5.1.1
  26. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: Allen and Unwin, Ltd; 1948. p. 9-232.
  27. Turley PK, Kean C, Schur J, Stefanac J, Gray J, Hennes J, Poon LC. Orthodontic force application to titanium endosseous implants. Angle Orthod 1988;58:151-62.
  28. Roberts WE, Helm FR, Marshall KJ, Gongloff RK. Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage. Angle Orthod 1989;59:247-56.
  29. Linder-Aronson S, Nordenram A, Anneroth G. Titanium implant anchorage in orthodontic treatment: an experimental investigation in monkeys. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:414-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/12.4.414
  30. Smalley WM, Shapiro PA, Hohl TH, Kokich VG, Branemark PI. Osseointegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:285-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90053-4
  31. Kinzinger GS, Gulden N, Yildizhan F, Diedrich PR. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:578-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.049
  32. Bondemark L, Kurol J, Bernhold M. Repelling magnets versus superelastic nickel-titanium coils in the simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars. Angle Orthod 1994;64:189-98.
  33. Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM. A concept and classifications of centers of rotation and extraoral force systems. Angle Orthod 1973;43:384-401.
  34. Gianelly AA, Vaitas AS, Thomas WM. The use of magnets to move molars distally. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96:161-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90257-6
  35. Gianelly AA. Distal movement of the maxillary molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:66-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70240-9
  36. Ten Hoeve A. Palatal bar and lip bumper in nonextraction treatment. J Clin Orthod 1985;19:272-91.
  37. Jeckel N, Rakosi T. Molar distalization by intra-oral force application. Eur J Orthod 1991;3:43-6.
  38. Smith DI. The eruption of third molars following extraction of second molars. Dental Pract 1958;8:292-4.
  39. Staggers JA. A comparison of results of second molar and first premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:430-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81652-X

Cited by

  1. Effects of maxillary molar distalization with Zygoma-Gear Appliance vol.82, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2319/091611-595.1
  2. A reliable method for evaluating upper molar distalization: Superimposition of three-dimensional digital models vol.45, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.2.82
  3. Three-dimensional analysis of the distal movement of maxillary 1st molars in patients fitted with mini-implant-aided trans-palatal arches vol.45, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.5.236
  4. Role of anatomical sites and correlated risk factors on the survival of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.19, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0225-1