Indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle

  • Rahman, Siddiqur (Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Huque, Fazlul (Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Ahasan, Shamim (Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Song, Hee-Jong (Korean Zoonoses Research Institute, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2010.05.17
  • Accepted : 2010.06.04
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

Brucellosis is a major zoonosis caused by Gram negative facultative intracellular bacterial organisms of the genus Brucella that are pathogenic for a wide variety of animals and human beings. Because of its economic impact on animal health and the risk to the human population,most countries have a brucellosis control program. Brucellosis is also an economically important andprevalent disease in Bangladesh. The accurate and prompt diagnosis is very important in controlling and eradicating of the disease in animals. The present study was undertaken to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis in cattle in Mymensingh and Patuakhali district of Bangladesh. A total of 120 serum samples were collected from the two districts along with a questionnaire related to the epidemiology of the disease. The sampleswere screened by using slow agglutination test and conformed by indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. The overall seroprevalence of brucellosis in cattle was 5% and it was observed that, a higher prevalence of Brucella was found in female than male, through natural breeding than artificial insemination (AI) and animal above 4 years old are highly susceptible than younger ones. Higher prevalence was found in aborted animals in comparison with non aborted animal. Finally, the study revealed that the female animal has more susceptible to brucellosis and healthy semen should be used for AI.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdoel T, Dias IT, Cardoso R, Smits HL. 2008. Simple and rapid field test for brocellosis in livestock. Vet Microbiol 130(3-4): 312-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.01.009
  2. Amin KMR.2003. Serological epidemiology of bovine and caprine brucellosis. MS thesis. Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh.
  3. Amin KMR, Rahman MB, Kabir SML, Sarkar SK, Akand MSI. 2004. Serological epidemiology of brucellosis in cattle of Mymensingh districts of Bangladesh. J Animal Vet Adv 3(11): 773-775.
  4. Anonymous M. 1918. Animal report, 1917-1918. Imperial Institute of Veterinary Research, Mukteswar, Uttar Pradesh, India: 16.
  5. Aulakh HK, Patil PK, Sharma S, Kumar H, Mahajan V, Sandhu KS. 2008. A study on the epidemiology of bovine brucellosis in Punjab (India) using Milk-ELISA. Aata Vet 77: 393-399.
  6. Azimun N. 2007. Sero-prevalence of Brucella abortus infection of cattle and in contact human in Mymensingh. MS thesis, Department of Medicine, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
  7. Erdenebaatar J, Bayarsaikhan B, Yondondorj A, Watarai M, Shirahata T, Jargalsaikhan E, Kawamoto K, Makino S. 2004. Epidemiological and serological survey of brucellosis in Mongolia by ELISA using sarcosine extracts. Microbiol Immunol 48(8): 571-577.
  8. Garin B, Trap D, Gouman R. 1985. Assesment of EDT A seroagglutination test for diagnoses of bovine brucellosis. Vet Rec 117: 444-445. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.117.17.444
  9. Ghani M, Zeb A, Siraj M, Naeem M. 1998. Sero-incidence of bovine brucellosis in Peshawar district of Pakistan. Ind J Anim Sci 68(5): 457.
  10. Hugh-Jones ME. 2000. Zoonoses, recognition, control and prevention. 1st ed, Edited by Hugh-Jones ME, Hubbert WT, Hagstad HV. Iowa State University Press, A Blackwell Publishing Company.
  11. Islam A, Haque M, Rahman A, Rahman MM, Rahman A, Haque F. 1983. Economiclosses due to brucellosis in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Vet J 17(1-4): 57-62.
  12. Mathur TNM. 1971. Brucellosis and farm management. Ind Vet J 48: 219-228.
  13. Mia AS, Islam H. 1967. A preliminary study on the incidence of bovine infertility and economic loss caused by it. Pakistan Vet J 12: 12-15.
  14. Mustafa AH, Nicoletti P. 1995. FAO, WHO, OlE, guidelines for a regional brucellosis control programme for the Middle East. Workshop of Amman, Jordan, Ammended at the Round-Table.
  15. Nielsel K, Duncan JR. 1990. Animal brucellosis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
  16. Plommet H. 1971. Effect of brucellosis in bovine reproduction efficiency. In: Current Therpy in Theriogenology. 2nd ed., 1986. Edited by Morrow DAWB. Saundres Co. Philadelphia: 272.
  17. Rahman MM, Chowdhury TIMF, Rahman A, Haque F. 1983. Seroprevalence of human and animal brucellosis in Bangladesh. Ind Vet J 60: 165-168.
  18. Rahman MA, Islam MS, Alam MGS, Samsuddin M.1997. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in the buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) of a selected area of Bangladesh. Buffalo J 2: 209-214.
  19. Radostits OM. 2000. Veterinary medicine. 9th ed., Edited by Radostits OM, Gay CC, Blood DC, Hinchcliff KW. W.B. Saunders Company Ltd: 871-882.
  20. Rahman MS. 2003. Experimental infection and protective immunity of Sprague-Dawley rats with Brucella abortus. Ph D thesis, submitted to College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonbuk National University Graduate School, South Korea.
  21. Rahman MS, Han JC, Park JH, Lee JH, Eo SK, Chae JS. 2006. Prevalence of brucellosis and its association with reproductive problems in cows in Bangladesh. Vet Rec 159: 180-182. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.159.6.180
  22. Sarumathi C, Reddy TV, Sreedevi B. 2003. Serological survey of bovine brucellosis in Andhra Pradesh. Ind J Dairy Sci 56(6): 408-410.
  23. Sergeant ES. 1994. Seroprevalence of Brucella ovis infection in commercial ram flocks in the Tamworth area. N Z Vet J 42(2): 97-110.
  24. Sewell MMM, Blocklesby DW. 1990. Animal disease in the Tropics. Bailliere Tindall, London: 385.
  25. Timoney JF, Gillespie JH, Scott FW, Barlough JE. 1988. Hagan and Bruner's Microbiology and infectious diseases of domestic animals. 8th ed., Cornell University Press, Ithaca. NY: 135-152.