Web Structure of the Wasp Spider, Argiope bruennichi, Depending on Micro-Habitat Characteristics

미소서식지 특성에 따른 긴호랑거미 (Argiope bruennichi)의 웹 구조 분석

  • 김길원 (인천대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학부) ;
  • 김덕래 (인천대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학부) ;
  • 진우영 (인천대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학부)
  • Received : 2010.03.02
  • Accepted : 2010.04.28
  • Published : 2010.04.30

Abstract

Web building of the spider is an investment behavior for prey foraging with genetic constraint. Individual's decision-making on the web construction depends on diverse environmental variables. This study investigated web structure of the wasp spider, Argiope bruennichi, to compare individual's behaviors in dry field and in wet field. We measured 35 web structures in dry field (Chunma-San, Incheon) showing relatively low humidity (46.4%) and luxuriant herbage, and 13 web structures in the wet rice field (73.9%; Taean-Gun, Chungnam). Comparing to the wet field the individuals in the dry field invested significantly more silk: $32.5{\pm}12.8$ number of silk spirals used in the dry field vs. $16.9{\pm}5.4$ in the wet field. The web area of the dry field was greater than that of the wet field: $976{\pm}643cm^2$ vs. $532{\pm}254cm^2$. The web height, distance between the ground and the center of the web, appeared higher in the dry field than in the wet field: $71.4{\pm}39.6cm$ vs. $49.6{\pm}31.2cm$. Also the web constructed in the dry field showed longer stabilimentum than the web of the wet field: $18.8{\pm}3.4cm$ vs. $3.9{\pm}3.2cm$. The perpendicular inclination and the inclination to East-West of the web showed no difference between the two fields. This study suggests that adult females of A. bruennichi could modulate its construction behavior depending on the micro-habitat factors.

거미의 건축행동은 유전적 요인의 제한을 받지만 서식지의 다양한 환경 요인을 반영하는 먹이 사냥을 위한 투자 행동이며, 능동적인 의사결정의 반영이다. 본 연구는 긴호랑거미(Argiope bruennichi)를 대상으로 나대지 ('dry field')와 논습지('wet field')에 서식하는 개체가 건축한 웹의 물리적 구조를 정량적으로 측정 비교하였다. 습도 46.4%인 나대지(인천시 천마산)에서 35개체, 습도 73.9%의 논습지(충남 태안군)에서 13개체의 웹 구조가 분석되었다. 상대적으로 습도가 낮고 초본이 우거진 나대지 환경에 건축하는 개체의 경우 논습지 환경과 비교해 더 많은 거미실을 투자해($32.5{\pm}12.8$ vs. $16.9{\pm}5.4$ 개의 나선실 사용), 더 넓은 웹을 건축하였다($976{\pm}643cm^2$ vs. $532{\pm}254cm^2$). 또한 나대지에 서식하는 개체가 논습지 개체에 비해 더 높은 웹을 건축하는 것으로 나타났다($71.4{\pm}39.6cm$ vs. $49.6{\pm}31.2cm$). 흰띠줄 건축행동을 측정한 결과 나대지의 개체가 상대적으로 큰 흰띠줄을 건축하는 것으로 나타났다($18.8{\pm}3.4cm$ vs. $3.9{\pm}3.2cm$). 웹의 기울기를 측정한 수직경사와 동서경사의 경우 나대지와 논습지에서 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 본 연구 결과는 성체 암컷 긴호랑거미가 환경 요인에 따라 건축행동을 변화시킬 수 있다는 것을 시사한다

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, M.R., Choosing hunting sites: web site preferences of the orb weaver spider, Neoscona crucifera, relative to light cues. Journal of Insect Behavior, Vol. 13, pp. 299-305, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007771332721
  2. Blackledge, T.A., Stabilimentum variation and foraging success in Argiope aurantia and Argiope trifasciata (Araneae, Araneidae), Journal of Zoology, Vol. 246, pp. 21-27, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00128.x
  3. Blamires, S.J., Dieter, F., Hochuli, A., Michael, B., and Thompson, A., A Does decoration building influence antipredator responses in an orb-web spider (Argiope keyserlingi) in its natural habitat?, Australian Journal of Zoology, Vol. 55, pp. 1–7, 2007.
  4. Bruce, M.J., Heiling, A.M., and Herberstein, M.E., Web decoration and foraging success in Araneus eburnus (Araneae: Araneidae), Annales Zoologici Fennici, Vol. 41, pp. 563-575, 2004
  5. Craig, C.L., and Bernard, G.D., Insect attraction to ultraviolet-reflecting spider webs and web decorations, Ecology, Vol. 71, pp. 616-623, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940315
  6. Craig, C.L., and Ebert, K., Color and pattern in predator-prey interactions: the bright body colors and patterns of a tropical orb- spinning spider attract flower-seeking prey, Functional ecology, Vol 8, pp. 616-620, 1994. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389923
  7. Eberhard, W.G., Stabilimenta on the webs of Uloborus diversus (Araneae: Uloboridae) and other spiders, Journal of zoology of London, Vol. 171, pp. 367-384, 1973.
  8. Edgar, W.D., The life-cycle, abundance and seasonal movement of the wolf spider, Lycosa (Pardosa lugubris), in central Scotland, Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 40, pp. 303–322, 1971.
  9. Eisner, T., and Nowicki, S., Spider web protection through visual advertisement: Role of the stabilimentum, Science, Vol. 219, pp. 185-187, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.219.4581.185
  10. Foelix, R.F., Biology of spiders, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996.
  11. Gunnarsson, B., Bird predation and vegetation structure affecting spruceliving arthropods in a temperate forest, Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 65, pp. 389-397, 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/5885
  12. Im, M.S., and Kim, S.T., Field guide of Korean spiders, Konkuk University Press, 2000.
  13. Justice, M.J., Justice, T.C., and Regina, L.V., Web orientation, stabilimentum structure and predatory behavior of Argiope florida Chamberlin & Ivie 1944, Journal of Arachnology, Vol. 33, pp. 82-92, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1636/S03-53
  14. Kohler, T., and Vollrath, F., Thread biomechanics in the two orb-weaving spiders Aranues diadematus (Araneae, Araneidae) and Uloborus walckenaerius (Araneae, Uloboridae), Journal of Experimental Zoology, Vol. 271, pp. 1- 17, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402710102
  15. Krink, T., and Vollrath, F., Optimal area use in orb-webs of the spider Araneus diadematus, Naturwissenschaften, Vol. 87, pp. 90-93, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140050017
  16. Kronk, A.E., and Riechert, S.E., Parameters affecting the habitat choice of a desert wolf spider, Lycosa santrita Chamberlin and Ivie, Journal of Arachnology, Vol. 7, pp. 155–166, 1979.
  17. Li, D., and Jackson, R.R., How temperature affects development and reproduction in spiders: a review, Journal of Thermal Biology, Vol. 21, pp. 245-274, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4565(96)00009-5
  18. Lubin, Y., and Henschel, J., The influence of food supply on foraging behaviour in a desert spider, Oecologia, Vol. 105, pp. 64-73, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328792
  19. Marson, J.E., Some observations on the ecological variation an development of the cruciate zigzag camouflage device of Argiope pulchella, Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London, Vol. 117, pp. 219-227, 1947.
  20. Morse, D.H., and Fritz, R.S., Experimental and observational studies of patch choice at different scales by the crab spider Misumena vatia, Ecology, Vol. 63, pp. 172-182, 1982. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937042
  21. Norgaard, T., Henschel, J.R., and Wehner, R., Use of local cues in the night-time navigation of the wandering desert spider Leucorchestris arenicola (Araneae, Sparassidae), Journal of Comparative Physiology, Vol. 193, pp. 217–222, 2007.
  22. Opell, B.D., Material investment and prey capture potential of reduced spiderwebs, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 26, pp. 375-381, 1990.
  23. Robinson, M.H., and Robinson, B., The stabilimentum of the orb web spider, Argiope argentata: an improbable defense against predators, Canadian Entomologist, Vol. 102, pp. 641-655, 1970. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent102641-6
  24. SAS Institute, StatView, Version 5, 2001.
  25. Sherman, P.M., The orb-web: an energetic and behavioral estimator of a spider's dynamic foraging and reproductive strategies, Animal Behaviour, Vol. 48, pp. 19-34, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1208
  26. Silberglied, R.E., Communication in the ultraviolet, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Vol. 10, pp. 373-398, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.002105
  27. Tolbert, W.W., Predator avoidance behaviors and web defensive structures in orb-weavers Argiope aurantia and Argiope trifasciata(Araneae, Araneidae), Psyche, Vol. 82, pp. 29-52, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1155/1975/39173
  28. Tso, I.M., Stabilimentum of the garden spider Argiope trifasciata: a possible prey attractant, Animal behavior, Vol. 52, pp. 183-191, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0163
  29. Vollrath, F., Downes, M., and Krackow, S., Design variability in web geometry of an orb-weaving spider, Physiology and Behavior, Vol. 62, pp. 735-743, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(97)00186-8
  30. Wise, D.H., and Barata, J.L., Prey of two synoptic spiders with different web structures, Journal of Arachnology, Vol. 11, pp. 271-281, 1983.