임플란트의 형태가 초기 안정성에 미치는 영향

Influence of Implant Designs on Initial Stability

  • 조재명 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 김창섭 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 윤미정 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 정창모 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 서승우 (오스템 임플란트 연구소)
  • Cho, Jae-Myoung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Seop (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Yun, Mi-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Seo, Seung-U (Osstem implant research center)
  • 투고 : 2010.01.25
  • 심사 : 2010.03.25
  • 발행 : 2010.03.30

초록

임플란트-골 계면상에 미세동요 없이 회복기를 가지는 것은 골융합을 위해서 필수적이다. 이를 위해 임플란트의 초기 안정성은 성공적인 예후를 위해서 중요한 요건이다. 충분한 골질과 골량은 임플란트의 초기 안정성과 조기 실패 방지를 위해 중요한 요소이지만, 임플란트가 갖는 외형적 특성이 초기 안정성에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구는 부족하다. 이에 본 연구는 임플란트의 형태가 초기 안정성에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 골질에 따라 피질골과 해면골의 두께가 서로 다른 모형골에 straight body의 US II, GS II, SS II system과 tapered body의 GS III system (OSSTEM Implant Co., Seoul, Korea) 임플란트를 식립하고 식립 회전력과 공진 주파수 및 동요도를 측정하였다. 이번 실험에서 초기 안정성에 주요한 영향을 미치는 요소는 골질로 나타났다. 임플란트의 형태에 따라 이중 나사선을 가지는 GS II 임플란트가 초기 안정성은 높게 나타났으며 tapered 한 임플란트가 straight 임플란트에 비해서 높은 초기 안정성을 얻을 수 있음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 tapered 임플란트 식립 시 임플란트의 외형과 조화된 식립구를 형성하는 것이 피질골이 두꺼운 경우 피질골에 과도한 압축력을 감소시키고 반대의 경우 해면골로부터 좀 더 많은 골고정을 얻을 수 있음을 알 수 있었다.

An undisturbed healing process without micromotion at the implant-bone interface is essential for achievement of osseointegration of dental implant. Therefore, initial stability was advocated as prerequisite for successful clinical outcome. Adequate bone quality and quantity were important to achieve initial stability and to prevent early failures. However there were few published data available regarding the effect of design change in implant geometry on initial stability of the implants. The purpose of the current study was to assess the initial stability of various designs of implants when placed into artificial bone materials of varying qualities and shapes of insertion holes. Within the scope of this study, the following results were drawn. Bone quality was major importance to achieve initial stability. Initial stability was higher on GS II which had additional design feature of double thread. With a tapered design of implant such as GS III showed a higher initial stability than straight one. An insertion hole with the similar shape of implant would lead to reduce a compression force on cortical bone and enhance a bone anchorage on cancellous bone.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Monish Bhola, Anthony L. neelyN Shilpa Kolhatkar. Immediate implant placement: Clinical decision, advantage and disadvantages J Prosthet Dent 2008;17:576-81.
  2. Meredith N. Assessment of implant Stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
  3. Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant Stability: Current Status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:743-54.
  4. Calandriello R, Tomatis M. Simplified treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla via immediate/early function and tilted implant: a prospective 1-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(suppl.1)s1-s12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00069.x
  5. Chaushu G, Chaushu S, Tzohar A, Dayan D. Immediate loading of single-tooth implant: immediate versus non-immediate implantation. A clinical report. Int J oral Maxillofac implanats 2001;16:267-272.
  6. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Immediate and early implant loading protocols : A literature review of clinical studies J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:242-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.015
  7. Morton D, JaffinR, Weber HP. Immediate restoration and loading of dental implants : clinical considerations and protocols. Int J oral Maxillofac implants 2004;19:103-8.
  8. Orsini E. Salgarello S. Bubalo M. Lazic Z. Trire A. Martini D. Franchi M. Rugger A. Histomorphometric evaluation of implant design as a key factor in peri-implant bone response : a preliminary study in dog model. Minerva Stomatol 2009;58:263-75.
  9. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants : A human cadaver study. Clin Implant Relate Res 2000;2:85-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00110.x
  10. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Wendellhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthet 2006;19:77-84.
  11. Nkenke E, Fenner M. Indications for immediate loading of implants and implant success. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;2:19-34.
  12. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental backgriund. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  13. Albrektsson T. Direct bone anchorage of dental implant. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:255-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90027-6
  14. Cochran DL, Morton D, Weber HP. Consensus statements and recomanded clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:109-13.
  15. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O et al. Osseointegration implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw : experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;11:1-132. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317709025488
  16. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites : Surgical and restorative advantage. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1989;9:333-43.
  17. Aparicio C, Rangert B, Sennerby L. Immediate/early loading of dental implants : a report from the sociedad Espanola de implantes world congress consensus meeting in Barcelona, Spain. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;5:57-60.
  18. West JD, Oates TW. Identification of stability changes for immediately placed dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:623-30.
  19. Ottoni JM, Oliveria ZF, Mansini R, Cabral AM. Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 2005;20:769-76.
  20. Uribe R, Penarrocha M, Balaguer J, Fulgueiras N. Immediate loading in oral implants. Present situation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005;2:E143-53.
  21. Vanden Bogaerde L, Pedretti G, Dellacasa P, Mozzati M, Rangert B, Wendelhag I. Early function of splinted implants in maxillas and posterior mandibles, using Branemark System Tiunite implants : an 18-month prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:121-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00219.x
  22. Johansson B, Back T, Hirsch JM. Cutting torque measurements in conjunction with implant placement in grafted and nongrafted maxillas as an objective evaluation of bone density : A possible method for identifying early implant failure? Clin Implant Dent Relate Res 2004;6:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00022.x
  23. Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of branemark system implants of various diameters : A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:671-7.
  24. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry : Basic concept and principle. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:264-74.
  25. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Issue in bone mechanics related to oral implants. Implant Dent 1992;1:289-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199200140-00011
  26. Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants Clin Oral Implant Res 2006;17:244-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01201.x
  27. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:297-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80163-5
  28. Orenstein IH, MacDonald DE, Tao AC, Morris HF. Electronic percussive testing of the stability of an immediately provisionalized implant placed into a fresh extraction socket : a pilot evaluation. J Oral Implantol 2007;33(2):69-74. https://doi.org/10.1563/0.813.1
  29. Lachmann S, Jager B, Axmann D, Gomez-Roman G, Groten M, Weber H. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part I : an in vitro study on measurement reliability and a method of comparison in the determination of primary dental implant stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:75-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01173.x