Corrosion Science and Technology

The Corrosion Science Society of Korea (한국부식방식학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Corrosion Behavior of a High-Manganese Austenitic Alloy in Pure Zinc Bath

  • Yi, Zhang (School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Liu, Junyou (School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Wu, Chunjing (School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2009.07.27
  • Accepted : 2010.04.08
  • Published : 2010.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In order to further reduce the cost without reducing the corrosion resistance, a high-manganese austenitic alloy for sink roll or stabilizer roll in continuous hot-dip coating lines was developed. A systematic study of corrosion behavior of the high-manganese austenitic alloy in pure zinc bath at $490^{\circ}C$ was carried out. The results shows that, the high-manganese austenitic alloy shows better corrosion resistance than 316L steel. The corrosion rate of the high-manganese austenitic alloy in pure zinc bath is calculated to be approximately $6.42{\times}10^{-4}g{\cdot}cm^{-2}{\cdot}h^{-1}$, while the 316L is $1.54{\times}10^{-3}g{\cdot}cm^{-2}{\cdot}h^{-1}$. The high-manganese austenitic alloy forms a three-phase intermetallic compound layer morphology containing ${\Gamma$}, ${\delta}$ and ${\zeta}$ phases, while the 316L is almost ${\zeta}$ phase. The ${\Gamma}$ and ${\delta}$ phases of the high-manganese austenitic alloy contain about 8.5 wt% Cr, the existence of Cr improve the stabilization of phases, which slow down the reaction of Fe and Zn, improve the corrosion resistance of the high-manganese austenitic alloy. So substitute the nickel with the manganese to manufacture the high-manganese austenitic alloy of low cost is feasible.

Keywords

References

  1. X. L. Ma, School of Materials Science and Engineering Shenyang University of Technology, Shengyang, 3, 1 (2006) (in Chinese).
  2. B. J. Wang, School of Materials Science and Engineering Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 3, 1 (2006) (in Chinese).
  3. B. J Wang, W. J. Wang, and J. P. Lin, Angang Technology. 1, 15 (2006) (in Chinese).
  4. M.S. Brunnock, R.D. Jones, G.A. Jenkins, and D. T. Llewellyn. lronmaking and Steelmaking, 23, 171 (1996).
  5. L. B. Matthew, West Virginia University. Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering, 27 (2000).
  6. L. Xinbo, B. Ever, and J. Xu, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 36, 2049 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-005-0325-7
  7. M. Onishi, V. Wakamatsu, and H. Miura, J. Inst. Met., 37. 1279 (1973). https://doi.org/10.2320/jinstmet1952.37.12_1279
  8. C. Allen and J. Mackowiak, J. Inst. Met., 63, 369 (1962).
  9. A. R. Marder, Prog. Mater. Sci., 45, 191 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(98)00006-1
  10. J. Mackowiak and N. R. Shon, Inter. Met. Rev., 1 (1979).
  11. X. Liu, E. Barbero, and C. Irwin., AISTech 2005, Proceedings of the Iron & Steel Technology Conference. p. 403. Charlotte. North Carolina, U.S.A (2005)
  12. G. Reumonta, J. B. Vogta, lost, and J. Foct, Surf. Coat. Tech., 139, 265 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01017-9
  13. B. Peng, J. H. Wang, X. P. Su, Z. Li, and F. C. Yin, Surf. Coat. Tech. 7. 1 (2007).
  14. A. Turnbull, M. W. Carroll, and D. H. Ferriss, Corros. Sci., 30, 667 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(90)90031-Y
  15. M. Andreani. P. Azou, and P. Bastien. C. R Acad. Sci. Paris. 263, 1041 (1966).