Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bonding efficacy of cured or uncured dentin adhesives in indirect resin

간접 레진수복시 상아질 접착제의 중합 여부에 따른 결합 효능

  • Jang, Ji-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Bin-Na (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Chang, Hoon-Sang (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Hwang, Yun-Chan (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Oh, Won-Mann (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Hwang, In-Nam (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Chonnam National University School of Dentistry)
  • 장지현 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보존학교실) ;
  • 이빈나 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보존학교실) ;
  • 장훈상 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보존학교실) ;
  • 황윤찬 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보존학교실) ;
  • 오원만 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보존학교실) ;
  • 황인남 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 보존학교실)
  • Received : 2011.08.19
  • Accepted : 2011.10.17
  • Published : 2011.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined the effect of the uncured dentin adhesives on the bond interface between the resin inlay and dentin. Materials and Methods: Dentin surface was exposed in 24 extracted human molars and the teeth were assigned to indirect and direct resin restoration group. For indirect resin groups, exposed dentin surfaces were temporized with provisional resin. The provisional restoration was removed after 1 wk and the teeth were divided further into 4 groups which used dentin adhesives (OptiBond FL, Kerr; One-Step, Bisco) with or without light-curing, respectively (Group OB-C, OB-NC, OS-C and OS-NC). Pre-fabricated resin blocks were cemented on the entire surfaces with resin cement. For the direct resin restoration groups, the dentin surfaces were treated with dentin adhesives (Group OB-D and OS-D), followed by restoring composite resin. After 24 hr, the teeth were assigned to microtensile bond strength (${\mu}TBS$) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), respectively. Results: The indirect resin restoration groups showed a lower ${\mu}TBS$ than the direct resin restoration groups. The ${\mu}TBS$ values of the light cured dentin adhesive groups were higher than those of the uncured dentin adhesive groups (p < 0.05). CLSM analysis of the light cured dentin adhesive groups revealed definite and homogenous hybrid layers. However, the uncured dentin adhesive groups showed uncertain or even no hybrid layer. Conclusions: Light-curing of the dentin adhesive prior to the application of the cementing material in luting a resin inlay to dentin resulted in definite, homogenous hybrid layer formation, which may improve the bond strength.

연구목적: 본 연구는 간접 레진수복시 상아질 접착제의 중합 여부가 레진인레이와 상아질간의 미세인장결합강도와 결합계면의 형태에 미치는 영향을 공초점 현미경 관찰을 통하여 평가하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 24개의 발거된 대구치를 절단하여 교합면 상아질을 노출시켰다. 수복 방법에 따라 크게 간접 레진수복과 직접 레진수복의 두 군으로 나누었다. 간접 레진수복군은 임시 수복하여 1주일 후, 상아질 접착 과정에 따라 4군(OB-C와 OB-NC군, OS-C와 OS-NC군)으로 나누었다. 간접 레진수복군은 산부식 처리된 상아질면에 OptiBond FL (Kerr) 또는 One-Step (Bisco) 상아질 접착제를 중합 여부에 따라 나누어 적용하였다. 처리된 상아질면에 제작된 3 mm 높이의 레진 인레이(Tescera, Bisco)를 Variolink II (Ivoclar Vivadent)를 사용하여 제조사의 지시에 따라 합착하였다. 직접 레진수복군은 산부식 처리된 상아질면에 상아질 접착 후, 복합레진 (Estelite${\Sigma}$, Tokuyama)으로 즉시 수복하였다(OB-D군, OS-D군). 수복을 마친 모든 치아는 24시간 후, 미세인장 결합 강도 평가와 공초점 레이저 주사 현미경 관찰(CLSM)을 시행하였다. 결과: 간접 레진수복군은 직접 레진수복군에 비하여 낮은 미세인장결합강도를 나타내었으며, 상아질 접착제를 광중합한 군(OB-C군, OS-C군)이 광중합을 시행하지 않은 군(OB-NC군, OS-NC군)에 비하여 높은 미세인장결합강도를 나타내었다. 접착 계면에 대한 CLSM 관찰에서 상아질 접착제를 광중합한 군에서 더 분명하고 균일한 혼성층이 관찰되었다. 상아질 접착제를 광중합하지 않은 군에서는 혼성층이 불분명하거나 거의 관찰되지 않았다. 결론: 간접 레진수복물의 합착시 레진시멘트의 적용 전에 상아질 접착제의 광중합은 분명하고 균일한 혼성층의 형성하며, 이는 결합강도의 향상에 기여한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a "resin coating"on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent 2003;28:28-35.
  2. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry-a review. FDI commission project 1-97. Int Dent J 2000;50:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00540.x
  3. Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater 2000;16:292-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00020-8
  4. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:105-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00325.x
  5. Udo T, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Weerasinghe DS, Harada N, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Enhancement of adhesion between resin coating materials and resin cements. Dent Mater J 2007;26:519-525. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.519
  6. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.002
  7. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NR, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent 2004;32:55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.003
  8. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:511-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010
  9. Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Tensile bond strength of four resin luting agents bonded to bovine enamel and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:558-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00177-X
  10. Ozturk N, Aykent F. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:275-281. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.37
  11. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls:an SEM investigation. Dent Mater 2001;17:422-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00102-0
  12. Lee JI, Park SH. The effect of three variables on shear bond strength when luting a resin inlay to dentin. Oper Dent 2009;34:288-292. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-82
  13. Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:166-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60052-3
  14. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, Horner JA, Pashley DH, Caughman WF. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992;17:13-20.
  15. Dong CC, McComb D, Anderson JD, Tam LE. Effect of mode of polymerization of bonding agent on shear bond strength of autocured resin composite luting cements. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:229-234.
  16. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1033-1042. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x
  17. Lee HB, Han CH, Shim JS, Kim S. The comparison of microtensile bond stength with immediate and delayed dentin sealing. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2008;46:372-380.
  18. D'Alpino PH, Pereira JC, Rueggeberg FA, Svizero NR, Miyake K, Pashley DH. Efficacy of composite surface sealers in sealing cavosurface marginal gaps. J Dent 2006;34:252-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.06.010
  19. D'Alpino PH, Pereira JC, Svizero NR, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH. Use of fluorescent compounds in assessing bonded resin-based restorations: a literature review. J Dent 2006;34:623-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.12.004
  20. Kim DJ, Hwang YC, Kim SH, Oh WM, Hwang IN. Effect of dentinal tubules orientation on penetration pattern of dentin adhesives using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2003;28:392-401. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.5.392
  21. Pioch T, Stotz S, Staehle HJ, Duschner H. Applications of confocal laser scanning microscopy to dental bonding. Adv Dent Res 1997;11:453-461. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374970110041201
  22. Kanno T, Ogata M, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Microtensile bond strength of dual-cure resin cement to root canal dentin with different curing strategies. Dent Mater J 2004;23:550-556. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.23.550
  23. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17:144-154.
  24. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G.. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999;15:128-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00022-6
  25. Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 2002;18:609-621. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00005-2
  26. Monticelli F, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Cement system and surface treatment selection for fiber post luting. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:214-221.
  27. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:627-635.
  28. Valandro LF, Filho OD, Valera MC, de Araujo MA. The effect of adhesive systems on the pullout strength of a fiberglass-reinforced composite post system in bovine teeth. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:331-336.
  29. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue:methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204
  30. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives:a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003
  31. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Dental adhesives of the future. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:91-103.
  32. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho R, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002;30:371-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00064-7