DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

파에서 정식초기 파총채벌레의 경제적피해수준 설정

Economic Injury Level of Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on Welsh onions (Allium fistulosum L. var) in the Early Transplanting Stage

  • Kang, Taek-Jun (National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Cho, Myoung-Rae (National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Hyeong-Hwan (National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Jeon, Heung-Yong (National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Soon (College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Jeju National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.09.05
  • 심사 : 2011.10.09
  • 발행 : 2011.12.30

초록

파정식 초기 파총채벌레의 경제적피해허용수준을 설정하기 위하여 온실에서 파총채벌레 접종기간에 따른 파의 생육, 피해 및 수량을 조사하였다. 파 정식초기에는 파총채벌레 접종기간(즉 가해정도)에 따른 수량감소율은 5일, 10일, 15일, 20일 접종기간에서 각각 17.0%, 53.3%, 38.4%, 80.8%로 증가하였다. 파총채벌레 발생정도와 파 수량감소 관계를 구명하기 위하여 파총채벌레 누적밀도일(Cumulative Insect Days, CID)과 수량 감수량(%) 간 회귀분석을 실시한 결과 비선형식인 logistic 모형에 잘 적용되었다. 이 식으로부터 경험적인 수익한계(Gain Threshold) 5%와 통상적 상품화율(93%)를 감안한 수량 감소율 12% 수준에서 파총채벌레 경제적피해허용수준은 30 CID로 추정되었다. 또한 요방제밀도는 경제적피해수준의 80%가 되는 24 CID로 추정되었다. 본 결과는 더 개선된 모형이 개발될 때까지 파 생육초기 파총채벌레 관리에 유용하게 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단되었다. 또한 파 노지포장에서 생육후기(정식 후 120일 접종) 파총채벌레 피해가 파 수량에 미치는 영향을 검토한 결과, 파 생육후기에는 낮은 밀도에서 오히려 수량이 증가하였고, 그 후 밀도가 더 증가함에 따라 수량이 감소하는 등 전형적인 보상적 반응(over-compensatory response)을 보였다.

This study was conducted to develop economic injury level (EIL) of onion thrips, Thrips tabaci, on welsh onion (Allium fistulosum L. var) in the early transplanting stage. The changes of welsh onion biomass, yield loss, and T. tabaci density were investigated according to the inoculation periods of T. tabaci. In the early transplanting stage of welsh onion, the yield loss (%) increased with increasing inoculation periods: 17.0, 53.3, 38.4, and 80.8% yield loss in 5, 10, 15, and 20 d inoculation periods, respectively. The relationship between Cumulative Insect Days (CID) of T. tabaci and yield loss (%) of welsh onion was well described by a nonlinear logistic equation. Using the estimated equation, EIL of T. tabaci on welsh onion was estimated to 30 CID per plant based on the yield loss 12% (an empirical gain threshold 5% + marketable rate 93% of welsh onion). ET was calculated to 24 CID, which corresponds to 80% of EIL. Until a more defined EIL-model is developed, the present results should be useful for T. tabaci management in early growth stage of welsh onion. The effect of T. tabaci attack on the yield of welsh onion in late growing season (120 days after transplanting) was also examined. The yield of welsh onion increased at a low population density of T. tabaci and decreased at higher densities, showing a typical over-compensatory response.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, Y.S., D.G. Park., K.S. Han and K.R. Choe. 2006. Determination of economic injury levels (EILs) and control thresholds (CTs) of Aphis egomae (Hom.: Aphididae) in green perilla. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 45: 317-325.
  2. Fournier, F., G. Boivin and R.K. Stewart. 1995. Effect of Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on yellow onion yields and economic thresholds for its management. J. Econ. Entomol. 88: 1401-1407. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/88.5.1401
  3. Jandel Scientific. 1996. Table Curve 2D Software. San Rafael, CA.
  4. Kendall, D.M. and J.L. Capinera. 1987. Susceptibility of onion growth stages to onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) damage and mechanical defoliation. Environ. Entomol. 16: 859-863. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/16.4.859
  5. Ministry of Agriculture & Forestry. 2004. Development of economic injury level, simple sampling methods and study of occurrence for major pests on cucumbers, hot peppers and tomatoes. 752 pp.
  6. Park, K.W. 1997. Ecological characteristics and forecasting method of Thrips tabaci Lindenman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). M.S. Dissertation. 46pp. Chonnam National University.
  7. Pedigo, L.P. 1996. General models of economic thresholds. pp. 41-57. In Economic thresholds for integrated pest management, eds. by L.G. Higley and L.P. Pedigo. 327 pp. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
  8. Pedigo, L.P., S.H. Hutchins and L.G. Higley. 1986. Economic injury levels in theory and practice. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31: 341-368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.002013
  9. Poston, F.L., L.P. Pedigo and S.M. Welch. 1983. Economic injury levels: Reality and practicality. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 29: 49-53.
  10. RDA. 2008. Income analysis of agricultural products and livestocks. http://amis.rda.go.kr/
  11. Reuda, A., F.R. Badenes-Perez and A.M. Shelton., 2007. Developing economic thresholds for onion thrips in Honduras. Crop Prot. 26: 1099-1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.10.002
  12. Ruppel, R.F. 1983. Cumulative insect-days as an index of crop protection. J. Econ. Entomol. 76: 375-377. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/76.2.375
  13. Sanchez, J.A., F. Canovas and A. Lacasa. 2007. Thresholds and management strategies for Aulacorthum solani (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in greenhouse pepper. J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[123:TAMSFA]2.0.CO
  14. SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.11 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
  15. Southwood, T.R.E. and G.A. Norton. 1973. Economic aspects of pest management strategies and decisions. pp. 168-184. In Insects: Studies in population management, eds. by P.W. Geier, L.R. Clark, D.J. Adnerson and H.A. Nix. 1295 pp. Canberra: Ecol. Soc. Aust. Mem.
  16. Stern, V.M., R.F. Smith, R. Van den Bosch and K.S. Hagen. 1959. The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 29: 81-101. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v29n02p081
  17. Stone, J.D. and L.P. Pedigo. 1972. Development and economic injury level of the green clover worm on soybean in Iowa. J. Econ. Entomol. 65: 197-201. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/65.1.197
  18. Woo, K.S., O.K. Kweon and K.S. Cho. 1991. Studies on distribution, host plants and taxonomy of Korean thrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Seoul Nat'l Univ. J. Agric. Sci. 16: 133-148.

피인용 문헌

  1. Seasonal Occurrence and Insecticide Susceptibility by Thrips on Apple Orchards in Gyeongbuk Area vol.22, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2018.22.1.1