A Study on Chromosomal Mosaicism Detected through Cytogenetic Analysis

  • Hwang, Si-Mok (Division of Research and Development, GenDix, Inc.) ;
  • Kwon, Kyoung-Hun (Division of Research and Development, GenDix, Inc.) ;
  • Yoon, Kyung-Ah (Department of Clinical Pathology, Daejeon Health Sciences College)
  • Received : 2011.02.17
  • Accepted : 2011.03.30
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

Mosaicism is the presence of two or more chromosomally distinct cell lines, each seen in two or more cells. Chromosomal mosaicism presents one of the most difficult problems in prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis, requiring the differentiation of true mosaicism from pseudomosaicism. To overcome associated problems we investigated 24 cases (amniotic fluid 13 cases, abortus tissue 3 cases, peripheral blood 8 cases) in which mosaicism has been found in cytogenetic analysis. 5 cases (38.5%) of 13 amniotic fluid cells in which mosaicisms showed single cell pseudomosaicism. Chromosomal true mosaicism is found in about 0.28% (8/2,826) of amniotic fluid cell cultures. The 24 cases involved 12 cases (50%) with sex chromosomal abnormalities, 7 cases (29.2%) with autosomal structural defects, 3 cases (12.5%) with autosomal abnormalities, 2 cases (8.3%) with a supernumerary marker. Mosaicism detected in amniotic fluid may represent the true mosaicism or may pseudomosaicism. If the same chromosome abnormality is seen in more than one cell and in two different cultures, it is considered a true mosaicism, whereas single-cell abnormalities from a single culture are regarded as pseudomosaicism. In this study, we describe a mosaicism in chromosome analysis, its diagnostic problems and clinical significance.

Keywords

References

  1. Ford CE, Polani PE, Briggs JH, Bishop PM. A Presumptive human XXY/XX mosaic. Nature. 1959. 183: 1030-1032. https://doi.org/10.1038/1831030a0
  2. Hsu LY, Perlis TE. United States survey on chromosome mosaicism and pseudomosaicism in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 1984. 4: 97-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1970040708
  3. Hsu LY. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome anomalies. In: Genetic Disorders and the Fetus. 2nd ed.1986. pp. 115-183. Plenum Press. NY. USA.
  4. Hsu LY, Yu MT Richkind KE, Van Dyke DL, Crandall BF, Saxe DF, Khodr GS, Mennuti M, Stetten G, Miller WA, Priest JH. Incidence and significance of chromosome mosaicism involing an autosomal structural abnormality diagnosed prenatally through amniocentesis: a collaborative study. Prenat Diagn. 1996. 16: 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199601)16:1<1::AID-PD816>3.0.CO;2-W
  5. Hsu LY, Yu MT, Neu RL, Van Dyke DL, Benn PA, Bradshaw CL, Shaffer LG, Higgins RR, Khodr GS, Morton CC, Wang H, Brothman AR, Chadwick D, Disteche CM, Jenkins LS, Kalousek DK, Pantzar JJ, Wyatt P. Rare trisomy mosicism diagnosed in amniocytes, involving an autosome other than chromosomes 13, 18, 20 and 21:Karyotype/phenotype correlations. Prenat Diagn. 1997. 17: 201-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199703)17:3<201::AID-PD56>3.0.CO;2-H
  6. Jacobs PA, Hassold TJ. The origin of numerical chromosome abnormalities. Adv Genet. 1995. 33: 101-133.
  7. Johnson A, Wapner RJ, Davis GH, Jackson LG. Mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: an association with poor perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1990. 75: 573-577.
  8. Kalousek DK, Vekemans M. Confined placental mosaicism. J Med Genet. 1996. 33: 529-533. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.33.7.529
  9. Leach NT, Rehder C, Jensen K, Holt S, Jackson-Cook C. Human chromosomes with shorter telomeres and large heterochromatin regions have a higher frequency of acquired somatic cell aneuploidy. Mech Ageing Dev. 2004. 125: 563-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2004.06.006
  10. Ledbetter DH, Martin AO, Verlinsky Y, Pergament E, Jackson L, Yang-Feng T, Schongberg SA, Gilbert F, Zachary JM, Barr M, DiMaio MS, Fine B, Rosinsky B, Schuette J, Cruz FF, Goldberg JD, Desnick RJ, Elias S, Golbus MS, Copeland KL. Cytogenetic results of chorionic villus sampling: high success rate and diagnostic accuracy in the United States collaborative study. Am J Obestet Gynecol. 1990. 162: 495-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(90)90419-8
  11. Linden MG, Bender BG, Robinson A. Genetic counseling for sex chromosome abnormalities. Am J Med Genet. 2002. 110: 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.10391
  12. Martin AO, Simpson JL, Rosinsky BJ, Elias S. Chorionic villus sampling in continuing pregnancies. II. Cytognetic reliability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986. 154: 1353-1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(86)90724-6
  13. Martin RH, Ko E, Rademaker A. Distribution of aneuploidy in human gametes: comparison between human sperm and oocytes. Am J Med Genet. 1991. 39: 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320390315
  14. Nussbaum RL, Mclnnes RR, Willard HF. Thompson & Thompson Genetics in Medicine Sixth Edition. 2004. pp. 369-370, WB Saunders. Philadelphia. USA.
  15. Shaffer LG, Slovak ML, Campbell LJ. ISCN 2009; An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (2009). 2009. S. Karger AG. USA.
  16. Simpson JL, Martin AO, Verp MS, Elias S, Patel VA. Hypermodal cells in amniotic fluid cultures: frequency, interpretation, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982. 143: 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(82)90813-4
  17. Smahi A, Courtois G, Vabres P, Yamaoka S, Heuertz S, Munnich A, Israel A, Heiss NS, Klauck SM, Kioschis P, Wiemann S, Poustka A, Esposito T, Bardaro T, Gianfrancesco F, Ciccodicola A, D'Urso M, Woffendin H, Jakins T, Donnai D, Stewart H, Kenwrick SJ, Aradhya S, Yamagata T, Levy M, Lewis RA, Nelson DL. Genomic rearrangement in NEMO impairs NF-kappaB activation and is a cause of incontientia pigmenti. The International Incontinentia pigmenti(IP) Consortium. Nature. 2000. 405: 466-472. https://doi.org/10.1038/35013114
  18. Teplitz RL, Beutler E. Mosaicism, chimerism and sex-chromosome inactivation. Blood. 1966. 27: 258-271.
  19. Yurov YB, Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Liehr T, Kolotii AD, Kutsev SI, Pellestor F, Beresheva AK, Demidova IA, Kravets VS, Monakhov VV, Soloviev IV. Aneuploidy and confined chromosomal mosaicism in the developing human brain. PLoS One. 2007. 27; 2(6): e558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000558