DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

화산에 대한 예비 지구과학 교사들의 이해

Pre-service Earth Science Teachers Understanding about Volcanoes

  • 김형범 (한국교원대학교 지구과학교육과) ;
  • 정진우 (한국교원대학교 지구과학교육과) ;
  • 류춘렬 (한국과학기술원 영재교육센터)
  • Kim, Hyoung-Bum (Department of Earth Science Education, Korea National University of Education Cheongwon) ;
  • Jeong, Jin-Woo (Department of Earth Science Education, Korea National University of Education Cheongwon) ;
  • Ryu, Chun-Ryol (Center for Gifted Education, Korea Institute of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2011.12.07
  • 심사 : 2011.12.19
  • 발행 : 2011.12.31

초록

본 연구에서는 수정된 버전의 InVEST Volcanic Concept Survey 검사지를 통해 예비 지구과학교사들의 화산시스템에 대한 이해를 탐구하였다. 그 결과, 화산 과정을 이해하는 예비 지구과학교사들은 극히 제한적이라는 결과를 얻었다. 즉, 화산관련 용어의 단순개념을 묻는 질문들은 높은 점수의 응답들을 얻은 반면에 화산분출의 구조를 묻는 고도의 사고를 요구하는 깊은 개념적 연결의 질문들은 낮은 점수의 응답들을 얻었다. 특히, 환경과의 영향 및 위험 예측에 대한 문항에 대해서는 매우 낮은 이해를 나타내었다. VCS 결과는 개념구조의 틀 안에서 예비 지구과학교사들이 화산 개념을 잘 이해하고 있는지를 과학교육 연구자들에게 알려주는 측정 기준으로서의 교육적 가치를 향상시킬 것이다.

The purpose of this research is to explore preservice earth science teachers' understanding of volcanic systems using a modified version of InVEST Volcanic Concept Survey (InVEST VCS, Parham et al., 2010). Results showed that participants' understanding of volcanic concepts was rather limited. Questions requiring only basic content knowledge (e.g., terminology associated with volcano) received high scoring responses, while questions requiring higher order thinking and deeper conceptual connections as the mechanics of volcanic eruption received low scoring responses. Specifically, the prediction of hazards and impacts on the environment appeared to be poorly understood. VCS results can be applied to improve the subject content knowledge as well as the pedagogical knowledge that instructors may use when they assess students' understanding of volcanism within a solid conceptual framework.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김동렬, 2009, Driver의 개념변화 학습 모형을 적용한 수업이 고등학생들의 식물의 광합성과 호흡의 오개념 교정에 미치는 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 29, 712-729.
  2. 위수민, 조현준, 김준석, 김윤지, 2007, 광물과 암석에 대한 고등학생들의 개념 이해의 특징. 한국지구과학회지, 28, 415-430. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2007.28.4.415
  3. 정구송, 정진우, 2007, 지각과 지구 내부에 대한 고등학생들의 대안개념. 한국지구과학회지, 28, 266-276.
  4. 정재구, 성상현, 위수민, 정진우, 2003, 초등학교 과학 수업에서 화산 개념의 이해 증진을 위한 개념도 활동. 한국지구과학회지, 24, 614-624.
  5. 최성철, 안건상, 2008, 마그마와 판구조론에 대한 고등학생들의 오개념. 과학교육연구, 32, 121-145.
  6. 황정규, 1998, 학교 학습과 교육 평가. 교육과학사, 서울, 728 p.
  7. Barrow, L. and Haskins, S., 1996, Earthquake Knowledge and Experiences of Introductory Geology Students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26, 143-146.
  8. Bloom, B.S., 1956, Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1. Cognitive Domain. McKay, NY, USA, 205 p.
  9. Chang, C. and Barufaldi, J.P., 1999, The use of problemsolving- based instructional model in initiating change in students' achievement and alternative frameworks. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 373-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290606
  10. Ford, B. and Taylor, M., 2006, Investigating students' ideas about plate tectonics. Science Scope, 30, 38-43.
  11. Gibbs, A. and Lawson, A.E., 1992, The nature of scientific thinking as reflected by the work of biologists and by biology textbooks. The American Biology Teacher, 54, 137-151. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449435
  12. Gilbert, J.K., Osborne, R.J., and Fensham, P.J., 1982, Children's science and its consequence for teaching. Science Education, 66, 623-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660412
  13. Gobert, J.D., 2000, A typology of causal models for plate tectonics: Inferential power and barriers to understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 937-977. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416857
  14. Gobert, J.D. and Clement, J.J., 1999, Effect of studentgenerated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1<39::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-I
  15. Laudan, R., 1987, From mineralogy to geology: The foundations of a science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 278 p.
  16. Libarkin, J.C. and Anderson, S.W., 2005, Assessment of learning in entry-level geoscience courses: Results from the geoscience concept inventory. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 394-401.
  17. Libarkin, J.C. and Anderson, S.W., 2006, The geoscience concept inventory version 1.0. http://newton.bhsu.edu/eps/gci.html (검색일: 2008. 4. 16).
  18. Marques, L. and Thompson, D., 1997, Misconceptions and conceptual changes concerning continental drift and plate tectonics among Portugese students aged 16-17. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15, 195-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514970150206
  19. Miller, R., 1989, Science education and science studies. In Miller, R. (ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education. The Falmer Press, London, UK, 1-9.
  20. Holyoak, K.J. and Morrison, R.G., 2005, Thinking and reasoning: A reader's guide. In Holyoak, K.J. and Morrison, R.G., (eds.). The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge University Press, NY, USA, 1-9.
  21. Muthukrishna, N., Camine, D., Grossen, B., and Miller, S., 1993, Children's alternative frameworks: Should they be directly addressed in science instruction? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300303
  22. Osborne, R. and Freyberg, P., 1985, Learning in science. The implications of children science. Heinemann Publishers, Auckland, New Zealand, 203 p.
  23. Parham, T., Cervato, C., Gallus, W., Larsen, M., Hobbs, J., Stelling, P., Greenbowe, T., Gupta, T., Knox, J.A., and Gill, T.E., 2010, The InVEST volcanic concept survey: Exploring student understanding about volcanoes. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58, 177-187. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3544298
  24. Strike, K. and Posner, G., 1985, A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In West, L.H.T. and Pines, A.L. (eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change. Academic Press, Orlando, USA, 211-231.

피인용 문헌

  1. The Effects of Flash Panorama-based Virtual Field Trips on Middle School Students' Spatial Visualization Ability, Conceptual Understanding, and Perceptions vol.34, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2013.34.2.162
  2. Elementary Teachers’ Perceptions on the Experiment of Making a Model of Volcanic Activity vol.39, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2018.39.6.617