Study of the Plating Methods in the Experimental Model of Mandibular Subcondyle Fracture

하악골 과두하부 골절 실험모델에서 견고정을 위한 플레이트 고정방법 연구

  • Lee, Won (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Dankook University) ;
  • Kang, Dong Hee (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Dankook University)
  • 이원 (단국대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 강동희 (단국대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.12.31
  • Accepted : 2011.03.01
  • Published : 2011.04.10

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the biomechanical stability of four different plating techniques in the experimental model of mandibular subcondyle fracture. Methods: Twenty standardized bovine tibia bone samples ($7{\times}1.5{\times}1.0cm$) were used for this study. Each of the four sets of tibia bone was cut to mimic a perpendicular subcondyle fracture in the center area. The osteotomized tibia bone was fixed using one of four different fixation groups (A,B,C,D). The fixation systems included single 2.0 mm 4 hole mini adaption plate (A), single 2.0 mm 4 hole dynamic compression miniplate (B), double fixation with 2.0 mm 4 hole mini adaption plate (C), double fixation with a 2.0 mm 4 hole mini adaption plate and 2.0 mm 4 hole dynamic compression miniplate (D). A bending force was applied to the experimental model using a pressure machine (858 table top system, $MTS^{(R)}$) until failure occurred. The load for permanent deformation, maximum load of failure were measured in the load displacement curve with the chart recorder. Results: Double fixation with a 2.0 mm 4 hole mini adaption plate and a 2.0 mm 4 hole dynamic compression miniplate (D) applied to the anterior and posterior regions of the subcondyle experimental model showed the highest load to failure. Conclusion: From this study, double fixation with an adaption plate and dynamic compression miniplate fixation technique produced the greatest biomechanical stability. This technique may be considered a useful means of fixation to reduce the postoperative internal maxillary fixation period and achieve early mobility of the jaw.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 단국대학교

References

  1. Lee HC, Kang DH, Koo SH, Park SH: Outcome of open reduction via retromandibular approach for mandibular subcondyle fracture. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 32: 739, 2005
  2. Manisali M, Amin M, Aghabeigi B, Newman L: Retromandibular approach to the mandibular condyle: a clinical and cadaveric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32: 253, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0270
  3. Jang JY, Kang DH: Comparison study of open reduction and closed reduction in treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Korean Cleft Palate Craniofac Assoc 9: 51, 2008
  4. Hammer B, Schier P, Prein J: Osteosynthesis of condylar neck fractures: a review of 30 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35: 288, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-4356(97)90050-4
  5. Ziccardi VB, Schneider RE, Kummer FJ: Wurzburg lag screw plate versus four-hole miniplate for the treatment of condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55: 602, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90492-4
  6. Zide MF, Kent JN: Indications for open reduction of mandibular condyle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41: 89, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(83)90214-8
  7. Ellis E 3rd, Throckmorton G: Facial symmetry after closed and open treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58: 719, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2000.7253
  8. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM, Weijs WA, Naeije M: A three dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible bite forces. J Biomech 21: 563, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(88)90219-9
  9. Throchmorton GS, Dechow PC: In vitro strain measurements in the condylar process of the human mandible. Arch Oral Biol 39: 853, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(94)90017-5
  10. Choi BH, Kim KN, Kim HJ, Kim MK: Evaluation of condylar neck fracture plating techniques. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 27: 109, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(99)80023-7
  11. Tominaga K, Habu M, Khanal A, Mimori Y, Fukuda J: Biomechanical evaluation of different types of rigid internal fixation techniques for subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64: 1510, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.038
  12. Haug RH, Peterson GP, Goltz M: A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60: 73, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.29078