DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Economic Analysis of Transportation Equipments at Container Terminals

  • Jung, Sung-Ho (Operations Team Manager, Hanjin Newport Company) ;
  • Lim, Dong-Seok (Graduate school of National Korea Maritime University) ;
  • Nam, Ki-Chan (Dept. of Logistics Engineering, National Korea Maritime University)
  • Received : 2011.02.01
  • Accepted : 2011.03.30
  • Published : 2011.03.31

Abstract

The motivation of this study is the recent advancement of the Straddle Carrier (S/C). Previously Straddle Carrier (S/C) system was used focusing on container lift on/off due to its lower driving speed than that of (Y/T). Shuttle Carrier is evaluated as an upgraded Straddle Carrier. Recently, however, the driving speed of (S/C) has been improved to the level of Yard Tractor and Trailer systems (Y/T), which is 30Km per hour which makes (S/C) qualified as terminal in-yard transportation equipment. This paper, therefore, aims to evaluate three types of terminal in-yard transportation equipments such as (Y/T), (AGV) and the advanced (S/C) from economic perspective. The results revealed that by observing the total costs of equipment, (S/C) is a cheaper option than (Y/T) over 20 years, and than (AGV) over 6 years.

Keywords

References

  1. APM Terminals Virginia (www.apmterminals.com)
  2. .Baker, C.(1998), "High time for straddles", Cargo systems, October, 1998, pp.23-26
  3. Brisbane port (www.portbris.com.au)
  4. Choi, H.R., D.H. Yoo, N.K. Park, B.J. Park, H.K. Kwon(2005), “A Study on the Strategy Development of Automated Container Terminal: based on the cases of existing ACT, Journal of Shipping and Logistics, The korean Association of Shipping and Logistics, Vol.47, pp.59-78.
  5. Choi, S.H, T.Y. Ha(2006), "A Study on Productivity Analysis by Yard Layout of Container Terminal", Ocean Policy Research, Korea Maritime Institute, Vol.21. No.1, pp.151-183.
  6. Choi, Y.S., W.S. Kim, T.Y. Ha(2004), "An Estimate of the Required Number of Yard Tractor in Container Terminal", Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research, Vol.28 , No.6, pp.549-555. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2004.28.6.549
  7. Ha, T.Y., Y.S. Choi, W.S. .Kim(2004), “Simulation-based Evaluation of AGV Operation at Automated Container Terminal”, Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 28, N.10, pp891-897. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2004.28.10.891
  8. Kalmar(2008), Press Release, Karmar makes waves with the launch of its fully-automated Shuttle Carrier, Kalmar Press Release, 30, January 2008.
  9. Nam, K.C., K.S. Kwak and M.S. Yu(2002), "Simulation Study of Container Terminal Performance", Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal & Ocean Eng., ASCE,Vol.128, No.3, pp.126-132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2002)128:3(126)
  10. Vis, Iris F. A., De Koster, R., , K.J., L.W.P Roodbergen. Peeters(2001), "Determination of the number of automated guided vehicles required at asemi-automated container terminal", Journal of Operation Society, Vol.52, pp.409-417. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601094
  11. Vis, Iris F. A., Rene de Koster(2003), "Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.147, pp.1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00293-X
  12. Vis, Iris F. A., smael Harika(2004), "Comparison of vehicle types at an automated container terminal", OR Spectrum, Vol.26, pp.117-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-003-0146-2