The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration (수산경영론집)

The Korean Society of Fisheries Business Administration (한국수산경영학회)
권호 표지

A Study on Establishing the Performance Evaluation System of the Fish Stock Rebuilding Plans

수산자원회복계획의 성과평가 개선방향에 관한 연구

  • 김대영 (한국해양수산개발원 수산연구본부) ;
  • 이정삼 (한국해양수산개발원 수산연구본부) ;
  • 김도훈 (국립수산과학원)
  • Received : 2011.09.01
  • Accepted : 2011.11.04
  • Published : 2011.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Fish Stock Rebuilding Plan (FSRP) is evaluated as one of the most effective fisheries policies domestically and internationally. FSRP is a comprehensive fisheries policy, including target stock size, rebuilding period, application of management measures, and participation of fishermen. The performance outcomes of FSRPs have been partially evaluated for recommendation for stock rebuilding in Korea, while they are fully evaluated in other countries that have implemented FSRPs. The performance evaluation system for FSRP is very needed to enhance its effectiveness as one of fisheries policies. That is, the system where problems can be reconsidered, achieving targets can be evaluated, and the plan can be modified should be implemented. This study classified the performance evaluation of FSRP into the economic evaluation as a quantitative analysis and the policy evaluation as a qualitative analysis. In the economic evaluation, the sustainability of fishery resources, the stability of fishing business, the efficiency of fishery production, and efficient utilization of fishery resources can be considered. As analytical methods for the economic evaluation, the bioeconomic model, efficiency estimation model, the dynamic MEY model can be utilized. The qualitative evaluation is to assess the qualitative performances of FSRPs, including interviews and surveys with fishermen and fisheries experts. In the survey, many different items can be included by evaluation factors which are related to policies such as timeliness, transparency, effectiveness, etc. In addition, the study suggested the performance evaluation system and procedures for objective and efficient evaluation of FSRPs. In order to practically apply the developed performance evaluation model, the pilot project is needed. That is, from the application of pilot project, detailed research methods, effective procedures, and evaluation factors can be investigated.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 해양수산개발원

References

  1. 고영선 외, 재정사업 심층평가 지침, 한국개발연구원, 2007, pp.58-60.
  2. 김도훈," 자원회복계획의 개념과 도입 방향", KMI 해양수산현안분석 , 한국해양수산개발원, 2004, pp.1-19.
  3. 김도훈," 우리나라 근해어업의 어획능력 측정에 관한 연구", 수산경영론집, 제37권 제1호, 2006, pp.1-24.
  4. 김대영 외, 수산자원조성사업의 평가체제 구축방안에 관 한 연 구 , 한국해양수산개발원 기본과제 2008-19, 2008, pp.22-53.
  5. 농림수산식품부, 수산자원회복계획 추진실적, 2009.
  6. 농림수산식품부, 수산자원관리위원회 운영시행지침, 2010.
  7. 농림수산식품부, 2009년도 성과관리 시행계획, 2010, pp.343-345.
  8. 농림수산식품부, 2010년도 성과관리 시행계획, 2010, pp.191-192.
  9. 류정곤 외, 중장기 수산자원회복계획 추진에 관한 연구, 해양수산부, 2005, pp.5-24.
  10. 류정곤 외, 어업관리수단 효과분석을 위한 생물경제 모델 활용에 관한 연구, 한국해양수산개발원 기본과제 2005-13, 2005, pp.2-3.
  11. 문신용, 성과분석 평가의 이해 : 공공서비스의 통합적 분석, 삼영사, 2004, p.46.
  12. 이상고, 수산자원회복계획의 체계적 이행방안 연구, 부경대학교, 2008, p.442.
  13. 정정길 외, 정책평가 -이론과 적용-, 법영사, 2004, pp.6-10.
  14. 한국행정연구원 정책평가센터, 정부업무평가의 새로운 패러다임, 한국행정연구원, 2005, pp.72-79.
  15. Arnason, R." Global Capture Fisheries and Aquaculture: Main issues and Prospects,"2010 국제수산전망대회-Fisheries Prospects and Issues-, 한국해양수산 개발원, 2010, p.21.
  16. Clark, C., Mathematical Bioeconomics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York. 1990.
  17. Clark, C. and G. R. Munro, "The economics of fishing and modern capital theory : a simplified approach," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.2, 1975. pp.92-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(75)90002-9
  18. European Commission, Evaluating EU Expenditure Programmes : A Guide, First Edition, January 1997.
  19. FAO, Measuring and assessing capacity in fisheries: Issues and methods, FAO Fisheries Report 433(2), Rome, 2004.
  20. Haddon, M., Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries, Champman & Hall/CRC, 2001.
  21. Kirkley, J.E., R. Fare, S. Grosskopf, K. McConnell, D.E. Squires, and I. Strand, "Asessing capacity and capacity utilization in fisheries when data are limited,"North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol.21, 2001, pp.482-497. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(2001)021<0482:ACACUI>2.0.CO;2
  22. Larkin, S.L., Sylvia, G., Harte, M., and Quigley, K., "Optimal Rebuilding of Fish Stocks in Different Nations: Bioeconomic Lessons for Regulators," Marine Resource Economics, 21, 2006, pp.395-413. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.21.4.42629523
  23. Lee, D., S. Larkin and C. Adams., "A Bioeconomic Analysis of Management Alternatives for the U.S. North Atlantic Swordfish Fishery," Marine Resource Economics, 15(2), 2000, pp.77-96. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.15.2.42629293
  24. Murawski, S.A. and Edwards, S.F., "Potential Economic Benefits from Efficient Harvest of New England Groundfish," North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 13, 1993, pp.437-449. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1993)013<0437:PEBFEH>2.3.CO;2
  25. Pascoe, S., L. Coglan and S. Mardle, "Physical versus harvest-based measures of capacity: the case of the United Kingdom vessel capacity unit system," ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol.58, 2001, pp.1243-1253. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2001.1093
  26. Vedung, E., Public Policy and Program Evaluation, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, USA, 1997, p.8.