Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제36권2호
  • /
  • Pages.132-138
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중합방법이 이중중합 레진시멘트의 미세경도에 미치는 영향

Effect of curing modes on micro-hardness of dual-cure resin cements

  • 이기덕 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박세희 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김진우 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조경모 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Lee, Ki-Deok (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Park, Se-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Cho, Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2011.01.29
  • 심사 : 2011.02.24
  • 발행 : 2011.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구목적: 본 연구는 3종의 이중중합 레진시멘트에서 자가중합법과 이중중합법이 중합도에 미치는 영향을 간접적으로 알아보고자 시간경과에 따라 미세경도를 측정하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 실험을 위해 자가접착 레진시멘트인 Maxcem Elite (Kerr)와 Rely-X Unicem (3M ESPE) 및 전통형 레진시멘트인 Rely-X ARC (3M ESPE)를 사용하였으며 각 레진시멘트를 동일한 크기의 테플론 몰드에 채우고 자가중합법과 이중중합법으로 중합을 하여 각각 10개씩 시편을 제작하였으며 중합 시작 후 10분, 30분, 1시간, 3시간, 6시간, 12시간, 24시간이 지난 시점에 미세경도를 측정하였다. 결과: 각 시점에서 레진시멘트별로 중합법 사이의 비교를 위한 independent samples t-test 및 모든 실험군 사이의 비교를 위한 one-way ANOVA와 Scheffe 사후검정을 95% 유의수준에서 실시하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 모든 실험군에서 시간이 경과함에 따라 미세경도가 증가하는 경향을 보였다. 2. Maxcem에서 중합 1시간 후 부터를 제외하고 이중중합이 자가중합에 비해 높은 미세경도 값을 보였다(p<0.05). 3. 매 시점에서 자가중합법의 Rely-X Unicem이 가장 낮은 미세경도를 보였으며 이중중합법의 Rely-X Unicem이 가장 높은 미세경도 값을 보였다. 결론: 이상의 실험 결과로 볼 때 이중중합 레진시멘트의 충분한 중합을 위해서는 광조사를 반드시 하여야 할 것으로 생각한다.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate curing degree of three dual-cure resin cements with the elapsed time in self-cure and dual-cure mode by means of the repeated measure of micro-hardness. Materials and Methods: Two dual-cure self-adhesive resin cements studied were Maxcem Elite (Kerr), Rely-X Unicem (3M ESPE) and one conventional dual-cure resin cement was Rely-X ARC resin cement (3M ESPE). Twenty specimens for each cements were made in Teflon mould and divided equally by self-cure and dual-cure mode and left in dark, $36^{\circ}C$, 100% relative humidity conditional-micro-hardness was measured at 10 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 3 hr, 6 hr, 12 hr and 24 hr after baseline. The results of micro-hardness value were statistically analyzed using independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons using Scheffe's test. Results: The micro-hardness values were increased with time in every test groups. Dual-cure mode obtained higher micro-hardness value than self-cure mode except after one hour of Maxcem. Self-cured Rely-X Unicem showed lowest value and dual-cured Rely-X Unicem showed highest value in every measuring time. Conclusions: Sufficient light curing to dual-cure resin cements should provided for achieve maximum curing.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Theodore M, Harald O, Edward J. Sturdevant's art & science of operative dentistry. 5th ed. St. Louis, USA: Mosby; 2006.p225-227.
  2. Michelle CA, Abbariki M, Orr JF. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns. Dent Mater 2000;16:198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00009-9
  3. Kwon PC, Park JW. Influence of thickness on the degree of cure of composite resin core material. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2006;31:352-358. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.5.352
  4. Kim YJ, Jin MU, Kim SK, Kwon TY, Kim YK. Polymerization of dual cured composites by different thickness. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2008;33:169-76. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.3.169
  5. Cadenaro M, Navarra CO, Antoniolli F, Mazzoni A, Di Lenarda R, Rueggeberg FA, Breschi L. The effect of curing mode on extent of polymerization and microhardness of dual-cured, self-adhesive resin cements. Am J Dent 2010;23:14-18.
  6. Borges GA, Agarwal P, Miranzi BA, Platt JA, Valentino TA, dos Santos PH. Influence of different ceramics on resin cement Knoop Hardness Number. Oper Dent 2008;33:622-628. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-155
  7. Shin HJ, Song CK, Park SH, Kim JW, Cho KM. Physical properties of different self-adhesive resin cements and their shear bond strength on lithium disillicate ceramic and dentin. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 2009;34:184-191. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.3.184
  8. Danesh G, Davids H, Reinhardt KJ, Ott K, Schafer E. Polymerisation characteristics of resin composites polymerised with different curing units. J Dent 2004;32:479-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.03.003
  9. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006;22:211-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.005
  10. Noronha Filho JD, Brandao NL, Poskus LT, Guimaraes JG, Silva EM. A critical analysis of the degree of conversion of resin-based luting cements. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:442-446. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000500003
  11. Pedreira AP, Pegoraro LF, Goes MF, Pegoraro TA, Carvalho RM. Microhardness of reisn cements in the intraradicular environment: effect of water storage and softening treatment. Dent Mater 2009;25:868-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.096
  12. Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT. Curing efficiency of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2009;25:1104-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.015
  13. Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG. Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in light-cured composite. J Dent Res 1988;67:932-937. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670060801
  14. Ferracane JL. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dent Mater 1985;1:11-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80058-0
  15. Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Osorio R, Casucci A, Toledano M, Ferrari M. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on self-adhesive cements bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 2008;24:1156-1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.005
  16. Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Degree of conversion of dual-cure luting resins light-polymerized through various materials. Acta Odontol Scand 2007;65:201-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350701311632
  17. Monteiro GQ, Souza FB, Pedrosa RF, Sales GC, Castro CM, Fraga SN, Galvao BH, Braz R. In vitro biological responsetoa self-adhesive resin cement under different curing strategies. J Biomed mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010;92:317-321.
  18. Piwowarczyk A, Bender R, Ottl P, Lauer HC. Longterm bond between dual-polymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue. Dent Mater 2007;23:211-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.012
  19. Aguiar TR, Di Francescantonio M, Ambrosano GMB, Gianini M. Effect of curing mode on bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cements to dentin. J Biomed mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010;93:122-127. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31566
  20. Roberts HW, Leonard DL, Vandewalle KS, Cohen ME, Charlton DG. The effect of a translucent post on resin composite depth of cure. Dent Mater 2004;20:617-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.004