The Effect of Cross-Education in Nondominant Arm with Normal Adult

정상인의 비우성 상지를 이용한 교차훈련의 효과

  • Choi, Jin-Ho (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health & Therapy, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Lee, Mi-Young (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health & Therapy, Daegu Haany University)
  • 최진호 (대구한의대학교 보건치료대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 이미영 (대구한의대학교 보건치료대학 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2010.07.05
  • Accepted : 2010.10.03
  • Published : 2011.04.25

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the effects of physical practice, mental practice, and cross education using serial reaction time (SRT) in the non-dominant left arm of right-handed individuals. Methods: Subjects were divided into three groups; physical practice (n=8), mental practice (n=8) and controls (n=8). They did, respectively, physical training or mental training, or had no intervention for three weeks. Super lab 4.0 displayed four symbols on the monitor and subjects were asked to push the matching button. Reaction time was assessed pre- and post-intervention. Results: Reaction time was significantly lower after physical practice (p<0.05), but mental practice did not significantly lower reaction time? in the left hand. Also, reaction time was not significantly lower after physical practice or mental practice in the right hand. Conclusion: Physical practice can improve motor learning, but mental practice is not sufficient. Also, neither physical practice nor mental practice is sufficient for cross education from the nondominant to the dominant arm.

Keywords

References

  1. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: theory and practical applications. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
  2. Choi JH, Kwon YH. Medial reorganization of primary motor cortex in patient with traumatic brain injury: a fMRI case study. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2005;17(3):421-8.
  3. Xiong J, Ma L, Wang B et al. Long-term motor training induced changes in regional cerebral blood flow in both task and resting states. Neuroimage. 2009;45(1):75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.016
  4. Decety J, Grezes J. Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;3(5):172-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01312-1
  5. Ietswaart M, Johnston M, Dijkerman HC et al. Recovery of hand function through mental practice: a study protocol. BMC Neurol. 2006;6:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-6-39
  6. Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F et al. Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2003;20(2):1171-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00369-0
  7. Yue G, Cole KJ. Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. J of Neurophysiol. 1992;67(5): 114-23.
  8. Kua WY, Kwak YS. The effects of imagery training on hockey stroke performance in middle school players. Korea Sport Research. 2005;13(6):175-84.
  9. Farthing JP, Borowsky R, Chilibeck PD et al. Neurophysiological adaptations associated with cross-education of strength. Brain Topogr.2007;20(2):77-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-007-0033-2
  10. Yoo YC, Yoo SL. The effects of imagery training on basketball free-throw self-efficacy and performance for elementary school children. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology. 2002;13(2):91-102.
  11. Choi JH, Park SH. The effect of cross education using serial reaction time. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2008;20(4):15-20.
  12. Hortobagyi T, Scott K, Lambert J et al. Cross-education of muscle strength is greater with stimulated than voluntary contractions. Motor Control. 1999;3(2):205-19.
  13. Stromberg BV. Contralateral therapy in upper extremity rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med. 1986;65(3):135-43.
  14. Gentili R, Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T. Improvement and generalization of arm motor performance through motor imagery practice. Neuroscience. 2006;137(3):761-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.013
  15. Park JW, Kim JM, Seo JH et al. Reorganization of motor network and the effect of cross education derived from unilateral coordination training. KAUTPT. 200;9(3):67-76.
  16. Kawashima R, Inoue K, Sato K et al. Functional asymmetry of cortical motor control in left-handed subjects. Neuroreport. 1997;8(7):1729-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199705060-00032
  17. Kwon YH, Chang JS, Hong JH et al. Motor skill learning through mental imagery training with serial reaction time task. J Kor Soc Occup Ther. 2007;15(1):57-65.
  18. Park JW, Jang SH. The difference of cortical activation pattern according to moter learning in dominant and non-dominant hand: an fMRI case study. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2009;21(1):81-8. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.21.81
  19. Farthing JP, Chilibeck PD, Binsted G. Cross-education of arm muscular strength is unidirectional in right-handed individuals. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(9):1594-600. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000177588.74448.75
  20. Morton SM, Lang CE, Bastian AJ. Inter-and intra-limb generalization of adaptation during catching. Exp Brain Res. 2001;141(4):438-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210100889
  21. Mendoza D, Wichman H. "Inner" darts: effects of mental practice on performance of dart throwing. Percept Mot Skills. 1978;47(3 Pt 2):1195-9.
  22. Chung ST. A study on the effect of mental practice for the standing broad jump. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 1982;20(2):90-5.
  23. Lotze M, Halsband U. Motor imagery. J Physiol Paris. 2006;99(4-6):386-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.012
  24. Munn J, Herbert RD, Gandevia SC. Contralateral effects of unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(5):1861-6. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00541.2003
  25. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Donchin O, Gazzaniga MS et al. Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. JNeurohpysiol. 2003;89(1):168-76.
  26. Baizer JS, Kralj-Hans I, Glickstein M. Cerebellar lesions and prism adaptation in macaque monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 1999;81(4):1960-5.
  27. Rand MK, Hikosaka O, Miyachi S et al. Characteristics of a long-term procedural skill in the monkey. Exp Brain Res. 1998;118(3):293-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050284
  28. Sainburg RL, Wang J. Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information. Exp Brain Res. 2002;145(4):437-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1140-7
  29. Thut G, Cook ND, Regard M et al. Intermanual transfer of proximal and distal motor engrams in humans. Exp Brain Res. 1996;108(2):321-7.
  30. Parlow SE, Kinsbourne M. Asymmetrical transfer of training between hands: implications for interhemispheric communication in normal brain. Brain Cogn. 1989;11(1):98-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(89)90008-0
  31. Zhou S. Chronic neural adaptations to unilateral exercise: mechanisms of cross-education. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2000;28(4):177-84.
  32. Corbin CB. Relationships between physical working capacity and running performances of young boys. Res Q. 1972;43(2):235-8.
  33. Fadiga L, Buccino G, Craighero L et al. Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: a magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37(2):147-58.
  34. Hashimoto R, Rothwell JC. Dynamic changes in corticospinal excitability during motor imagery. Exp Brain Res. 1999;125(1):75-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050660
  35. Kiers L, Fernando B, Tomkins D. Facilitatory effect of thinking about movement on magnetic motor-evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;105(4):262-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-884X(97)00027-1
  36. Lee KY, Youn JC. The effects of psychological training on competition state anxiety, visual attention, and performance in archery. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology. 2001;12(1):195-210.