The Effect of Backward Walking Training Methods on Walking in Stroke Patients

  • im, Sang-Jin (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University) ;
  • Jeon, Chun-Bae (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University) ;
  • Kim, Chung-Sun (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University)
  • Received : 2011.04.29
  • Accepted : 2011.05.31
  • Published : 2011.06.25

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to examine, in stroke patients, differences between backward walking training applied on a treadmill and the same training applied on the ground. Methods: Twenty seven stroke patients were divided into a treadmill backward walking group of 14 patients and a ground backward walking group of 13 subjects. Each group performed their respective training method for 8 weeks (15 min per day, 4 days a week). Walking ability was measured using a 10 m MWS (Maximal Walking Speed) test and the GAITRite system to examine changes in walking. Cadence, stridelength, step time, step length and symmetry index of the less affected side were measured to examine changes in stance phase of the lower extremity of the more affected side. Results: 10 m MWS, cadence, stride length, step time and step length of the less affected side significantly increased and symmetry index significantly decreased after training in both groups. The treadmill backward walking group experienced a significantly greater increase in step time and step length and a significantly greater decrease in symmetry index than the ground backward walking group. Conclusion: The two walking training methods were effective for improving stability in stance phase of the lower extremity of the more affected side, but the treadmill method was more effective. The present study is meaningful in that it analyzed the effects of backward walking training methods on walking and the differences of the training methods to provide information necessary for effective treatment of stroke patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: A report from the american heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117(4):e25-146. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187998
  2. An SH, Lee YM, Yang KH. Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer combined with simultaneous functional electrical stimulation in chronic stroke patients. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2008;20(1):41‐7.
  3. Kwon MJ. Daily physical functioning and quality of life for stroke. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2007;19(5):87-96.
  4. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO et al. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: The copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(1):27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80038-7
  5. Mauritz KH. Gait training in hemiplegia. Eur J Neurol. 2002;9 Suppl 1:23-9; dicussion 53-61.
  6. Chen G. Treadmill training with harness support: A biomechanical basis for selection of training parameters for individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis. Standford University. Dissertation of Doctorate Degree. 2003.
  7. Eich HJ, Mach H, Werner C et al. Aero treadmill plus bobath walking training improves walking in subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabil. 2004;18:640-51. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr779oa
  8. Werner C, Von Frankenberg S, Treig T et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: A randomized crossover study. Stroke. 2002;33(12):2895-901. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000035734.61539.F6
  9. Shin WS, Song CH. Effects of virtual reality-based exercise on static balance and gait abilities in chronic stroke. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2009;21(3):33-40.
  10. Cho KH, Lee WH. The effects of two motor dual task training on balance and gait in patients with chronic stroke. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(4):7-14. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.22.7
  11. Kim EJ, Hwang BY, Kim JH. The effect of core strength exercises on balance and walking in patients with stroke. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2009;21(4):17-22.
  12. Cho KK, Kim YS, Cho SH. The comparative analysis of emg depending on variations of speed in forward walking and backward wa. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2007;17(3):1-10. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2007.17.3.001
  13. Weng CS, Wang J, Pan XY et al. Effectiveness of backward walking treadmill training in lower extremity function after stroke. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006;86(37):2635-8.
  14. Yang YR, Yen JG, Wang RY et al. Gait outcomes after additional backward walking training in patients with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(3):264-73. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215505cr860oa
  15. Threlkeld AJ, Horn TS, Wojtowicz G et al. Kinematics, ground reaction force, and muscle balance produced by backward running. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1989;11(2):56-63. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1989.11.2.56
  16. Davies PM. Right in the middle: Selective trunk activity in the treatment of adult hemiplegia. Germany, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990:230-235.
  17. Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(4):415-21. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921501678310216
  18. Giakas G, Baltzopoulos V. Time and frequency domain analysis of ground reaction forces during walking: An investigation of variability and symmetry. Gait Posture. 1997;5:189-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(96)01083-1
  19. Waagfjord J, Levangie PK, Certo CM. Effects of treadmill training on gait in a hemiparetic patient. Phys Ther. 1990;70(9):549-58; discussion 58-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/70.9.549
  20. Winter DA. The biomechanics and motor control of human gait. Ontario, University of Waterloo Press. 1987.
  21. Gretz HR, Doering LL, Quinn J. Functional ambulation performance testing of adults with down syndrome. Neuro Rehabil. 1998;11(3):211-25.