The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy

The Korean Society of Physical Therapy (대한물리치료학회)
권호 표지

A Calibration Study of Therapeutic Ultrasound Equipment Output Intensity Accuracy

  • Yuk, Goon-Chang (Department of Physical Therapy, Yeungnam University Hospital) ;
  • Ahn, Sang-Ho (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Park, So-Hyun (Medical Devices Clinical Trial Center of Yeungnam University Hospital)
  • Received : 2011.05.01
  • Accepted : 20110230
  • Published : 2011.06.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The principal objective of this study was to evaluate the power output of ultrasound in Korean clinics and compare the value with Korean and global standards. Methods: A total of 69 units were measured for ultrasound power output. The normal range of power output level was ${\pm}30%$ of the output set according to KFDA standards. Device model, manufacturer, ERA, and BNR were obtained via simple questionnaires. A portable ultrasound power meter was used for output measurement. Results: 37 machines, with reported ERA values, were assessed for power output per unit area. Of these machines, 13 (37.14%) were considered to be compliant with US FDA standards at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, $20W/cm^2$ and 18 (51.43%) were considered within KFDA standards. The remainder of the machines were outside the standard error and evidenced irregular output levels, even though most of them were the same model. Conclusion: Appropriate ultrasound intensity is incredibly important for safety and effective use. Therefore, the KFDA standards regarding ultrasound may require revision in light of global standards, including BNR and ERA additionally, attention should be paid to regular calibration for safe use in clinical practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker KG, Robertson VJ, Duck FA. A review of therapeutic ultrasound: Biophysical effects. Phys Ther. 2001;81(7):1351-8.
  2. Robertson VJ, Baker KG. A review of therapeutic ultrasound: Effectiveness studies. Phys Ther. 2001;81(7):1339-50.
  3. Park DJ. The effect of real-time ultrasound imaging feedback during abdominal hollowing in four point kneeling to healthy men. J Kor Soc Phys Ther 2010;22(6):1-6.
  4. Park DJ. Changes of thickness in abdominal muscles between crook lying and wall support standing during abdominal hollowing in healthy men. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(6):7-12. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.22.7
  5. Griffin XL, Costello I, Costa ML. The role of low intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy in the management of acute fractures: A systematic review. J Trauma. 2008;65(6):1446-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318185e222
  6. ter Haar G. Therapeutic applications of ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007;93(1-3):111-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.005
  7. Ferrari CB, Andrade MA, Adamowski JC et al. Evaluation of therapeutic ultrasound equipment performance. Ultrasonics. 2010;50(7):704-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2010.02.006
  8. Straub SJ, Johns LD, Howard SM. Variability in effective radiating area at 1 mhz affects ultrasound treatment intensity. Phys Ther. 2008;88(1):50-7. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060358
  9. IEC 61689. Ultrasonics - physiotherapy systems - performance requirements and methods of measurement in the frequency range 0.5 to 5 mhz. 1996.
  10. Shaw A, Hodnett M. Calibration and measurement issues for therapeutic ultrasound. Ultrasonics. 2008;48(4):234-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2007.10.010
  11. Artho PA, Thyne JG, Warring BP et al. A calibration study of therapeutic ultrasound units. Phys Ther. 2002;82(3):257-63.
  12. IEC. Testing and calibration of ultrasonic therapeutic equipment. 1963.
  13. USFDA. Radiation safety performance standard. Ultrasound therapy products. Title 21, Part 1050.10. 1979.
  14. Branch HP. Radiation emitting device regulations amendment pc 1981-908. 1981:1121-6.
  15. KFDA. Electrical medical device standard. 2009.
  16. Daniel DM, Rupert RL. Calibration and electrical safety status of therapeutic ultrasound used by chiropractic physicians. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003;26(3):171-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-4754(02)54130-0
  17. Pye SD, Milford C. The performance of ultrasound physiotherapy machines in lothian region, scotland, 1992. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1994;20(4):347-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(94)90003-5
  18. Kollmann C, Vacariu G, Schuhfried O et al. Variations in the output power and surface heating effects of transducers in therapeutic ultrasound. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(7):1318-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.02.001
  19. Alexander LD, Gilman DR, Brown DR et al. Exposure to low amounts of ultrasound energy does not improve soft tissue shoulder pathology: A systematic review. Phys Ther. 2009;90(1):14-25.