The Short Term Effects of the Decompression (KNX $7000^{(R)}$) and Traction Device on Pain in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain with or without Radicular Pain

만성 요통 및 하지방사통 환자에서 감압치료(KNX $7000^{(R)}$)와 견인치료의 단기 치료 효과

  • Park, So-Hyun (Medical Devices Clinical Trial Center of Yeungnam University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Chul-Seoung (Medical Devices Clinical Trial Center of Yeungnam University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Gyu (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Ahn, Sang-Ho (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University)
  • 박소현 (영남대학교병원 의료기기 임상시험센터) ;
  • 김철승 (영남대학교병원 의료기기 임상시험센터) ;
  • 이동규 (영남대학교 의과대학 재활의학교실) ;
  • 안상호 (영남대학교 의과대학 재활의학교실)
  • Received : 2011.05.24
  • Accepted : 2011.08.02
  • Published : 2011.10.25

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short term effects of the traction and decompression device, which is a newly developed domestic medical device, on pain and functional activity in patients with chronic low back pain with or without radicular pain. Methods: Forty patients with chronic low back pain were included and allocated to decompression (n=20) and traction groups (n=20). They received decompression or traction therapy for 20 minutes a day, 3 days per week for two weeks. For evaluating pain and functional activity, a visual analogue scale (VAS) for low back pain and the Oswestry back pain disability index (ODI) were obtained on pre-treatment, and at 6, 12 and 15 days after treatment. Patients'satisfaction levels were measured 15 days after treatment. Results: VAS was significantly decreased at 12 days and 15 days post-treatment compared to pre-treatment in both groups (p<0.05). ODI was significantly decreased at 12 days and 15 days post-treatment compared to pre-treatment in the decompression group (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the VAS and ODI scales (p>0.05). Patients' satisfaction levels were significantly higher in the decompression group than in the traction group (p<0.05). Conclusion: These findings suggest that decompression therapy might be effective for increasing functional activity in patients with low back pain and could provide patients with higher satisfaction than traction therapy. This study provided validity data for the therapeutic effects of the decompression device in patients with low back pain and it will be useful for medical cost development and patient education of this device.

Keywords

References

  1. Zhang YG, Guo TM, Guo X et al. Clinical diagnosis for discogenic low back pain. Int J Biol Sci. 2009;5(7):647-58.
  2. Kim HS, Choi JW, Chang SH et al. Treatment duration and cost of work-related low back pain in korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2005;20(1):127-31. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2005.20.1.127
  3. Last AR, Hulbert K. Chronic low back pain: Evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician. 2009;79(12):1067-74.
  4. Maher CG. Effective physical treatment for chronic low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35(1):57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00088-9
  5. Kwon WA, Ma SY, Hwang YT. The effects of intermittent traction and manual traction on lumbar herniated disc. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2009;21(3):9-16.
  6. You YY, Kim HS. Comparing the effects on elderly women of bearing weights and lumbar stabilization using lumbar muscle exercises group vs. Individual sessions with a physical therapist. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(5):17-23. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.22.17
  7. Macario A, Pergolizzi JV. Systematic literature review of spinal decompression via motorized traction for chronic discogenic low back pain. Pain Pract. 2006;6(3):171-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2006.00082.x
  8. Ramos G, Martin W. Effects of vertebral axial decompression on intradiscal pressure. J Neurosurg. 1994;81(3):350-3. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1994.81.3.0350
  9. van Tulder MW, Koes B, Malmivaara A. Outcome of noninvasive treatment modalities on back pain: An evidencebased review. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 Suppl 1:S64-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1048-6
  10. Clarke JA, van Tulder MW, Blomberg SE et al. Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(2):CD003010.
  11. Pellecchia GL. Lumbar traction: A review of the literature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;20(5):262-7. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1994.20.5.262
  12. Harte AA, Baxter GD, Gracey JH. The efficacy of traction for back pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(10):1542-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00294-6
  13. Ma S. Effect of whole body cryotherapy with spinal decompression on lumbar disc herniation by functional assessment measures. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society. 2010;21(6) 1108-15.
  14. Park JG, Kim DG. Effects of decompression therapy for the treatment of a herniated lumbar disc. The Journal of Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society. 2008;21(2): 143-9.
  15. Macario A, Richmond C, Auster M et al. Treatment of 94 outpatients with chronic discogenic low back pain with the drx9000: A retrospective chart review. Pain Pract. 2008; 8(1):11-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00167.x
  16. Apfel CC, Cakmakkaya OS, Martin W et al. Restoration of disk height through non-surgical spinal decompression is associated with decreased discogenic low back pain: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:155-60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-155
  17. Kim DY, Lee SH, Lee HY et al. Validation of the korean version of the oswestry disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(5):E123-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000157172.00635.3a
  18. Slipman CW, Lipetz JS, DePalma MJ et al. Therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of traumatically induced cervical spondylotic radicular pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(6):446-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200406000-00007
  19. Fritz JM, Thackeray A, Childs JD et al. A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of mechanical traction for sub-groups of patients with low back pain: Study methods and rationale. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:81-91. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-81
  20. Devine J, Norvell DC, Ecker E et al. Evaluating the Correlation and Responsiveness of Patient Reported Pain with Function and Quality of Life Outcomes after Spine Surgery. Spine. 2011[Epub ahead of print].
  21. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Howard J. Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes. Spine J. 2008;8(5):747-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.06.013
  22. Ostelo RW, de Vet HC. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005; 19(4):593-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.003
  23. Parker SL, Adogwa O, Paul AR et al. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(5):598-604. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.12.SPINE10472