DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensitivity-Based Method for the Effective Location of SSSC

  • Received : 2010.06.21
  • Published : 2011.01.20

Abstract

Congestion management is one of the most challenging aspects in the recently deregulated electricity markets. FACTS devices have been shown to be an efficient alternative to control the flow of power in lines, resulting in increased loadability, lower system loss and a reduced cost of production. In this paper, the application of a static series synchronous compensator (SSSC) for the purpose of congestion management of power systems has been studied. A sensitivity-based analysis method is utilized for effective determination of the SSSC location in an electricity market. The method is topology based and it is independent of the system operation point. A power injection p-model is developed for the SSSC in this study. Numerical results based on the modified IEEE 14 bus system with/without the SSSC demonstrate the feasibility as well as the effectiveness of the SSSC for congestion management in a network. The results obtained when using the SSSC to improve system transfer capability and congestion management is encouraging.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Alomoush and M. Shahidehpour, "Contingency constrained congestion management with a minimum number of adjustments in preferred schedules," Electric Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 22, pp. 277-290, Mar. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-0615(99)00059-9
  2. Stoft S, "Transmission pricing zones: simple or complex?," The Electricity Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 24-31, Feb. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(97)80294-1
  3. Shirmohammadi D, Wollenberg B, Vojdani A, Sandrin P, "Transmission dispatch and congestion management in the emerging energy market structures," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 13, No. pp. 1466-74, Nov. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.736292
  4. Gedra T, "On transmission congestion and pricing," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 241-8, Feb. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.744539
  5. Abdul-Rahman K, Shahidehpour M, "A practical power systems resource scheduling with OPF constraints," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 254-9, Feb. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.486103
  6. Deeb N, Shahidehpour M., "Improved system operation by optimal adjustment of reactive generation in electric power network," International Journal of Energy Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 651-64, Mar. 1990. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4440140607
  7. Abdul-Rahman K, Shahidehpour M., "A fuzzy-based optimal reactive power control," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 662-70, May 1993. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.260814
  8. Deeb N, Shahidehpour M., "Cross decomposition for multi-area optimal reactive power planning," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 1539-44, Nov. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.260957
  9. Tong S, Shahidehpour M., "An overview of power generation scheduling in the optimal operation of a large scale power system," Electric Machines and Power Systems, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp.731-62, Nov. 1991. https://doi.org/10.1080/07313569108909560
  10. Deeb N, Shahidehpour M., "Application of Newton's optimal power flow in voltage/reactive power control," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1454, Nov. 1990.
  11. Wang C, Shahidehpour M, Adapa R., "Optimal power generation scheduling," Proceedings of the American Power Conference, Apr. 1993.
  12. Abdul-Rahman K, Shahidehpour M., "Application of fuzzy sets to optimal reactive power planning with security constraints," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 589-97, May 1994. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.317685
  13. M. Gitizadeh, M. Kalantar, "FACTS devices allocation to congestion alleviation incorporating voltage dependence of loads," Iranian Journal of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 176-190, Oct. 2008.
  14. P. Bhasaputra and placeW. Ongsakul, "Optimal placement of multi-type facts devices by hybrid ts/sa approach," In Proc. 2003 of Circuita and Systems Int. Symp., pp III-375- III-378, 2003.
  15. L.J. Cai, I. Erlich, G. Stamtsis, "Optimal choice and allocation of FACTS devices in deregulated electricity market using genetic algorithms," In Proc. 2004 of Power Systems Conf., pp. 201-207, 2004.
  16. S. Gerbex, R. Cherkaoui, A. J. Germond, "Optimal location of multitype FACTS devices in a power system by means of genetic algorithms," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 537-544, Aug. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.932292
  17. H. C. Leung, T. S. Chung, "Optimal placement of FACTS controller in power system by a genetic-based algorithm," In Proc. 1999 IEEE Power Electronics and Drive Systems Conf., pp.833-836, 1999.
  18. F. G. M. Lima, F. D. Galiana, I. Kockar, J. Munoz, "Phase shifter placement in large-scale systems via mixed integer linear programming," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 1029-1034, Aug. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2003.814858
  19. Hiroyuki Mori, Yuichiro Goto, "A parallel tabu search based method for determining optimal allocation of FACTS in power systems," In Proc. 2000 of PowerCon Conf., pp. 1077-1082, 2000.
  20. W. Ongsakul, P. Jirapong, "Optimal allocation of FACTS devices to enhance total transfer capability using evolutionary programming," In Proc. 2005 of Circuits and Systems Int. Symp., pp. 4175-4178, 2005.
  21. T. Orfanogianni, R. Bacher, "Steady-state optimization in power systems with series FACTS devices," IEEE Trans. Power Systems, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 19-26, Feb. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2002.807110
  22. S.N. Singh and A.K. David, "A new approach for placement of FACTS devices in open power markets," IEEE Power Engineering Review, pp. 60-58, Sep. 2001.
  23. S.N. Singh and A.K. David, "Placement of facts devices in open power market," In Proc. 2000 IEEE Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management Conf., pp.173-177, 2000.
  24. W. Feng, G. B. Shrestha, "Allocation of TCSC devices to optimize total transmission capacity in a competitive power market," In Proc. 2001 of Power Engineering Sociecty Wint. Meet., pp. 587-593, 2001.
  25. Y. Lu, A. Abur, "Improving system static security via optimal placement of thyristor controlled series capacitors (TCSC)," In Proc. 2001 of Power Engineering Sociecty Wint. Meet., pp. 516-521, 2001.
  26. Preedavichit, P. and Srivastava, S.C., "Optimal reactive power dispatch considering FACTS devices," Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 251-257, Sep. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7796(98)00075-3
  27. Verma, K.S.; Singh, S.N.; and Gupta, H.O., "FACTS devices location for enhancement of total transfer capability," Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, Jan./Feb. 2001.
  28. Leonidaki, E.A., Hatziargyriou, StateN.D., Manos, G.A., and Papadias, B.C., "A systematic approach for effective location of series compensation to increase available transfer capability," Proceedings of the IEEE Porto Power Tech, Sep. 2001.
  29. L. Gyugyi, C.D. Shauder, and K.K. Sen, "Static synchronous series compensator: a solid-state approach to the series compensation of transmission lines," IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol.12, No.1, pp. 406-413, Jan. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1109/61.568265
  30. G.C. Ejebe and B.F. Wollenberg, "Automatic contingency selection," IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 92-104, Jan./Feb. 1979.

Cited by

  1. A survey on impact assessment of DG and FACTS controllers in power systems vol.42, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.057