DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimization of trusses under uncertainties with harmony search

  • Togan, Vedat (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Daloglu, Ayse T. (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University) ;
  • Karadeniz, Halil (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology)
  • Received : 2010.03.22
  • Accepted : 2010.11.17
  • Published : 2011.03.10

Abstract

In structural engineering there are randomness inherently exist on determination of the loads, strength, geometry, and so on, and the manufacturing of the structural members, workmanship etc. Thus, objective and constraint functions of the optimization problem are functions that depend on those randomly natured components. The constraints being the function of the random variables are evaluated by using reliability index or performance measure approaches in the optimization process. In this study, the minimum weight of a space truss is obtained under the uncertainties on the load, material and cross-section areas with harmony search using reliability index and performance measure approaches. Consequently, optimization algorithm produces the same result when both the approaches converge. Performance measure approach, however, is more efficient compare to reliability index approach in terms of the convergence rate and iterations needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Cheng, G., Xu, L. and Jiang, L. (2006), "A sequential approximate programming strategy for reliability based structural optimization", Comput. Struct., 84, 1353-1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.03.006
  2. Choi, S.K., Grandhi, R.V. and Canfield, R.A. (2007), Reliability Based Structural Design, Springer, London.
  3. Degertekin, S.O. (2008), "Optimum design of steel frames using harmony search algorithm", Struct. Multidiscip. O., 36, 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0177-4
  4. Der Kiureghian, A., Zhang, Y. and Li, C.C. (1994), "Inverse reliability problem", J. Eng. Mech.-ASCE, 120, 1154-1159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:5(1154)
  5. Enevoldsen, I. and Sorensen, J.D. (1994), "Reliability based optimization in structural engineering", Struct. Saf., 15, 169-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(94)90039-6
  6. Gasser, M. and Schueller, G.I. (1997), "Reliability based optimization of structural systems", Math. Method Oper. Res., 46, 287-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01194858
  7. Geem, Z.W., Kim, J.H. and Loganathan, G.V. (2001), "A new heuristic optimization algorithm: Harmony search", Simulation, 76(2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/003754970107600201
  8. Geem, Z.W. (2000), "Optimal design of water distribution networks using harmony search", PhD Thesis, Korea University.
  9. Haug, E.J., Choi, K.K. and Komkov, V. (1986), Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems, Academic Press, Orlando.
  10. JCSS (2000), Probabilistic Model Code, Part 1-Basis of Design, Joint Committee on Structural Safetys.
  11. Karadeniz, H. and Vrouwenvelder, T. (2006), Overview of Reliability Methods, Report-SAF-R5-1-TUD-01-(10), Delft University of Technology.
  12. Kharmanda, G., Mohamed, A. and Lemaire, M. (2002), "Efficient reliability based design optimization using a hybrid space with application to finite element analysis", Struct. Multidiscip. O., 24, 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-002-0233-z
  13. Kuschel, N. and Rackwitz, R. (1997), "Two basic problem in algorithms for reliability-based optimal design", Math. Method Oper. Res., 46, 309-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01194859
  14. Lee, J.O., Yang, Y.S. and Ruy, W.S. (2002), "A comparative study on reliability index and target-performance based probabilistic structural design optimization", Comput. Struct., 80, 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00006-8
  15. Li, H. and Foschi, R.O. (1998), "An inverse reliability method and its application", Struct. Saf., 20, 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(98)00010-1
  16. Madsen, H.O., Krenk, S. and Lind, N.C. (1986), Methods of Structural Safety, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
  17. Melchers, R.E. (2001), Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
  18. Mohamed, A. and Lemaire, M. (1999), "The use of sensitivity operators in the reliability analysis of structures", Proceeding of 3th International Conference on Computational Stochastic Mechanics, Balkema.
  19. Saka, M.P. (2007), "Optimum geometry design of geodesic domes using harmony search algorithm", Adv. Struct. Eng., 10(6), 595-606. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943307783571445
  20. TS 648 (1982), Building Code for Steel Structures, Turkish Standard Institute (TSE), Ankara
  21. Tu, J., Choi, K.K. and Park, Y.H. (1999), "A new study on reliability based design optimization", J. Mech. Design, 121(4), 557-564. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2829499
  22. Tu, J. (1999), "Design potential concept for reliability based design optimization", PhD Thesis, The University of Iowa.

Cited by

  1. Optimum design of axially symmetric cylindrical reinforced concrete walls vol.51, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.361
  2. Optimum design of steel frames with semi-rigid connections and composite beams vol.55, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.2.299
  3. Optimal Thrust Allocation for Semisubmersible Oil Rig Platforms Using Improved Harmony Search Algorithm vol.39, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2013.2270017
  4. Reliability-based design optimization of structural systems using a hybrid genetic algorithm vol.52, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.52.6.1099
  5. Overview of Harmony Search algorithm and its applications in Civil Engineering vol.7, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-013-0100-4
  6. A comparative study on optimum design of multi-element truss structures vol.22, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.3.521
  7. Harmony Search Algorithm Approach for Optimum Design of Post-Tensioned Axially Symmetric Cylindrical Reinforced Concrete Walls vol.164, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-014-0562-2
  8. Optimum tuned mass damper approaches for adjacent structures vol.7, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.6.1071
  9. Efficient gravitational search algorithm for optimum design of retaining walls vol.45, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.1.111
  10. A novel harmony search based optimization of reinforced concrete biaxially loaded columns vol.54, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.6.1097
  11. Metaheuristic based optimization of tuned mass dampers under earthquake excitation by considering soil-structure interaction vol.92, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.019
  12. An improved algorithm in railway truss bridge optimization under stress, displacement and buckling constraints imposed on moving load vol.46, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.46.4.571
  13. An Intelligent Tuned Harmony Search algorithm for optimisation vol.196, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.035
  14. Discrete optimization of trusses using an artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and the fly-back mechanism vol.44, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.44.4.501
  15. Optimum design of steel space frames under earthquake effect using harmony search vol.58, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.58.3.597
  16. System RBDO of truss structures considering interval distribution parameters vol.70, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.1.081
  17. A research on optimum designs of steel frames including soil effects or semi rigid supports using Jaya algorithm vol.73, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.73.2.153