DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Active mass damper control for cable stayed bridge under construction: an experimental study

  • Chen, Hao (State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Sun, Zhi (State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Sun, Limin (State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University)
  • Received : 2009.06.24
  • Accepted : 2010.12.08
  • Published : 2011.04.25

Abstract

A cable stayed bridge under construction has low structural damping and is not as stable as the completed bridge. Control countermeasures, such as the installation of energy dissipating devices, are thus required. In this study, the general procedure and key issues on adopting an active control device, the active mass damper (AMD), for vibration control of cable stayed bridges under construction were studied. Taking a typical cable stayed bridge as the prototype structure; a lab-scale test structure was designed and fabricated firstly. A baseline FEM model was then setup and updated according to the modal parameters measured from vibration test on the structure. A numerical study to simulate the bridge-AMD control system was conducted and an efficient LQG-based controller was designed. Based on that, an experimental implementation of AMD control of the transverse vibration of the bridge model was performed. The results from numerical simulation and experimental study verified that the AMD-based active control was feasible and efficient for reducing dynamic responses of a complex structural system. Moreover, the discussion made in this study clarified some critical problems which should be addressed for the practical implementation of AMD control on real cable-stayed bridges.

Keywords

References

  1. Achkire, Y. and Preumont, A. (1996), "Active tendon control of cable-stayed bridges", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 25(6), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199606)25:6<585::AID-EQE570>3.0.CO;2-I
  2. Boonyapinyo, V., Aksorn, A. and Lukkunaprasit, P. (2007), "Suppression of aerodynamic response of suspension bridges during erection and after completion by using tuned mass dampers", Wind Struct., 10(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2007.10.1.001
  3. Caicedo, J.M., Dyke, S.J., Moon, S.J., Bergman, L.A., Turan, G. and Hague, S. (2003), "Phase II benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges", J. Struct. Control, 10, 137-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.23
  4. Chen, H. (2007), "Experimental study on active control of cable-stayed bridge under construction", Master Thesis, Tongji University.
  5. Dyke, S.J., Caicedo, J.M., Turan, G., Bergman, L.A. and Hague, S. (2003), "Phase I benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 129(7), 857-872. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(857)
  6. Frederic, B. and Andre, P. (2001), "Active tendon control of cable-stayed bridges: a large-scale demonstration", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 30, 961-979. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.40
  7. Korlin, R. and Starossek, U. (2007), "Wind tunnel test of an active mass damper for bridge decks", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 95, 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2006.06.015
  8. Laub, A.J. and Arnold, W.F. (1984), "Controllability and observability criteria for multivariable linear secondorder models", IEEE T. Automat. Contr., 29(2), 163-165. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1984.1103470
  9. Quanser Consulting Inc. (2002), Active Mass Damper: Two-Floor (AMD-2), User Manual.
  10. Schemmann, A.G. (1997), "Modeling and active control of cable-stayed bridges subject to multiple-support excitation", PhD Thesis, Standford University.
  11. Shelley, S.J., Lee, K.L., Aksel, T. and Aktan, A.E. (1995), "Active control and forced vibration studies on highway bridges", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 121(9), 1306-1312. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:9(1306)
  12. Sun, Z., Hou, W. and Chang, C.C. (2009), "Structural system identification under random excitation based on asymptotic wavelet analysis", Eng. Mech. 26(6), 199-204. (in Chinese)
  13. Ubertini, F. (2010), "Prevention of suspension bridge flutter using multiple tuned mass dampers", Wind Struct., 13(3), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2010.13.3.235
  14. Warnitchai, P., Fujino, Y., Pacheco, B.M. and Agret, R. (1993), "An experimental study on active tendon control of cable-stayed bridges", Earthq. Eng.Struct. D., 22, 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290220202
  15. Wu, J.C., Yang, J.N. and Schmitendorf, W.E. (1998), "Reduced-order H and LQR control for wind-excited tall buildings", Eng. Struct., 20(3), 222-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00081-3
  16. Xu, Y. and Chen, J. (2008), "Modal-based model reduction and vibration control for uncertain piezoelectric flexible structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 29(5), 489-504. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2008.29.5.489

Cited by

  1. Seismic control response of structures using an ATMD with fuzzy logic controller and PSO method vol.51, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.4.547
  2. Semi-active vibration absorber based on real-time controlled MR damper vol.46, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.01.017
  3. Frequency and damping adaptation of a TMD with controlled MR damper vol.21, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/5/055011
  4. Vibration control in wind turbines for performance enhancement: A comparative study vol.22, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2016.22.1.107
  5. Telescopic columns as a new base isolation system for vibration control of high-rise buildings vol.3, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.6.853
  6. Seismic Control of High-Rise Buildings Equipped with ATMD Including Soil-Structure Interaction Effects vol.12, pp.03, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431118500100
  7. Vibration control of suspension bridge due to vertical ground motions vol.23, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433220919079
  8. A control scheme for AMD in the presence of time-delays and SSI effects for tall buildings vol.79, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.79.2.267