DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimal environmental range for Juncus effusus, an important plant species in an endangered insect species (Nannopya pygmaea) habitat in Korea

  • Yoon, Ji-Hyun (Department of Biology Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Heung-Tae (Department of Biology Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Nam, Jong-Min (Department of Biology Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Geun (Department of Biology Education, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2011.03.26
  • Accepted : 2011.03.31
  • Published : 2011.06.01

Abstract

Juncus effusus is mostly found in freshwater wetlands and is widely used for landscaping and creating artificial wetlands due to its high ecological value. J. effusus tends to dominate during the early stage (3-10 years) of the second succession in abandoned paddy fields. This study focused on the environmental characteristics of J. effusus to create habitat for an endangered species, Nannopya pygmaea, which lives in wetlands dominated by J. effusus. Considering the distribution of J. effusus and N. pygmaea, 63 quadrats at eight wetlands were investigated between May and June 2006 during the critically dry period. Fifty-three species from 28 families co-occurred with J. effusus, and Persicaria thunbergii was the most abundant (63.5%). The optimal ranges of distribution (ORD) for the water variables were water depth, -2 to 10 cm; dissolved oxygen, 0.99-3.55 mg/kg, conductivity (CON), 23.40-115.40 ${\mu}s/cm$, total dissolved solid, 12.53-57.60 mg/L; pH, 5.00-6.87; $K^+$, 0.11-1.46 mg/L; $Ca^{2+}$, 1.53-5.85 mg/L; $Na^+$, 3.16-7.47 mg/L; $Mg^{2+}$, 0.11-1.96 mg/L; $NO_3$-N, < 0.001-0.072 mg/L; $NH_4$-N, 0.005-0.097 mg/L; and $PO_4$-P, 0.006-0.047 mg/L. ORDs for the soil variables were water content, 1.05-2.96%; loss-on ignition method (LOI), 5.07-7.81%; CON, 23.70-59.70 ${\mu}s/cm$; pH, 4.40-5.16; extracted (e) $K^+$, 4.34-15.73 cmol/kg; $eCa^{2+}$, 31.56-191.56 cmol/kg; $eNa^+$, < 0.01-2.61 cmol/kg; eMg, 0.04-19.82 cmol/kg; $eNO_3$-N, 0.514-1.175 mg/kg; $eNH_4$-N, 0.033-0.974 mg/kg, $ePO_4$-P, 0.491-11.552 mg/kg; total nitrogen, 0.016-0.200%; and total carbon, 1.06-2.37%. The appearance of rush during early succession indicated relatively lower levels of these physicochemical parameters, and that ORDs should be maintained for the J. effusus community.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson JA, Quarmby C. 1974. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. Blackwell Scienific Publications Osney Mead, Oxford.
  2. Bekker RM, Oomes MJM, Bakker JP. 1998. The impact of groundwater level on soil seed bank survival. Seed Sci Res 8: 399-404.
  3. Boyle J. 2004. A comparison of two methods for estimating the organic matter content of sediments. J Paleolimnol 31: 125-127. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPL.0000013354.67645.df
  4. Bray RH, Kurtz LT. 1945. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci 59: 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006
  5. Champness SS, Morris K. 1948. The population of buried viable seeds in relation to contrasting pasture and soil types. J Ecol 36: 149-173. https://doi.org/10.2307/2256652
  6. Chippindale HG, Milton WEJ. 1934. On the viable seeds present in the soil beneath pastures. J Ecol 22: 508-531. https://doi.org/10.2307/2256187
  7. Collins CD, Sheldon RB, Boylen CW. 1987. Littoral zone macrophyte community structure: distribution and association of species along physical gradients in Lake George, New York, U.S.A. Aquat Bot 29: 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(87)90095-7
  8. Comin FA, Romero JA, Hernández O, Menendez M. 2001. Restoration of wetlands from abandoned rice fields for nutrient removal, and biological community and landscape diversity. Restor Ecol 9: 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009002201.x
  9. Ervin GN. 2005. Spatio-temporally variable effects of a dominant macrophyte on vascular plant neighbors. Wetlands 25: 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1672/8
  10. Ervin GN. 2007. An experimental study on the facilitative effects of tussock structure among wetland plants. Wetlands 27: 620-630. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[620:AESOTF]2.0.CO;2
  11. Ervin GN, Wetzel RG. 1997. Shoot: root dynamics during growth stages of the rush Juncus effusus L. Aquat Bot 59: 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(97)00033-8
  12. Ervin GN, Wetzel RG. 2000. Allelochemical autotoxicity in the emergent wetland macrophyte Juncus effusus (Juncaceae). Am J Bot 87: 853-860. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656893
  13. Ervin GN, Wetzel RG. 2001. Seed fall and field germination of needlerush, Juncus effusus L. Aquat Bot 71: 233-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00190-5
  14. Ferreira LV, Stohlgren TJ. 1999. Effects of river level fluctuation on plant species richness, diversity and distribution in a floodplain forest in Central Amazonia. Oecologia 120: 582-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050893
  15. Fitter AH. 1982. Influence of soil heterogeneity on the coexistence of grassland species. J Ecol 70: 139-148. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259869
  16. Gerard M, El Kahloun M, Mertens W, Verhagen B, Meire P. 2008. Impact of flooding on potential and realised grassland species richness. Plant Ecol 194: 85-98.
  17. Godfrey RK, Wooten JW. 1979. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of the Southeastern United States: Monocotyledons. University of Georgia Press, Athens.
  18. Grace JB, Wetzel RG. 1981. Habitat partitioning and competitive displacement in cattails (Typha): experimental field studies. Am Nat 118: 463-474. https://doi.org/10.1086/283841
  19. Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R. 1990. The Abridged Comparative Plant Ecology. Unwin Hyman, London.
  20. Huston MA. 1994. Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  21. Kamphake LJ, Hannah SA, Cohen JM. 1967. Automated analysis for nitrate by hydrazine reduction. Water Res 1: 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(67)90011-5
  22. Keddy PA. 1984. Plant zonation on lakeshores in Nova Scotia: a test of the resource specialization hypothesis. J Ecol 72: 797-808. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259532
  23. Kim JG. 2003. Wetland conservation and restoration. Nat Conserv 123: 44-54.
  24. Kim JG, Park JH, Choi BJ, Sim JH, Kwon GJ, Lee BA, Lee YW, Ju EJ. 2004. Method in Ecology. Bomoondang, Seoul. (in Korean)
  25. Kim KG, Cho DG. 1999. The effects of the biodiversity increase after creation of the artificial wetland: the case of ecological pond at Seoul technical high school. J Korea Inst Landsc Architect 27: 1-17.
  26. Kim YS, Ko SC. 1980. Distribution Atlas of Plants of Korea (3): Atlas of Juncales in Korea. Korean J Plant Taxon 10: 73-96.
  27. Koo BH. 2003. Wetland type classification and functional assessment of an abandoned rice paddy Ja-un Wetland. J Korean Environ Restor Reveget Technol 6: 65-70.
  28. Kwon GJ, Lee BA, Byun CH, Nam JM, Kim JG. 2006. The optimal environmental ranges for wetland plants: I. Zizania Latifolia and Typha angustifolia. J Korean Environ Reveget Technol 9: 72-88.
  29. Kwon GJ, Lee BA, Nam JM, Kim JG. 2007. The relationship of vegetation to environmental factors in Wangsuk stream and Gwarim reservoir in Korea: II. Soil environments. Ecol Res 22: 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0188-4
  30. Lazenby A. 1955a. Germination and establishment of Juncus effusus L.: the effect of different companion species and of variation in soil and fertility conditions. J Ecol 43: 103-119. https://doi.org/10.2307/2257124
  31. Lazenby A. 1955b. Germination and establishment of Juncus effusus L.: II. The interaction effects of moisture and competition. J Ecol 43: 595-605. https://doi.org/10.2307/2257013
  32. Lee BA, Kwon GJ, Kim JG. 2005. The relationship of vegetation and environmental factors in Wangsuk Stream and Gwarim Reservoir: I. water environments. Korean J Ecol 28: 365-373. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2005.28.6.365
  33. Lee BA, Kwon GJ, Kim JG. 2007. The optimal environmental ranges for wetland plants: II. Scirpus tabernaemontani and Typha latifolia. J Ecol Field Biol 30: 151-159. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2007.30.2.151
  34. Lee CB. 2003. Coloured Flora of Korea. Vol. 2. Hyangmoonsa, Seoul.
  35. Lee CS, You YH, Robinson GR. 2002. Secondary succession and natural habitat restoration in abandoned rice fields of central Korea. Restor Ecol 10: 306-314. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.00003.x
  36. Lee HHM. 2000. Classification of wetlands in Korea. Ms Thesis. Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
  37. Lee YN. 2006. Flora of Korea. Kyohak Publishing Co. Ltd., Seoul. (in Korean)
  38. Marschner H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London.
  39. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in Korea. 2004. The statistic report of paddy fields area. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Gwacheon. (in Korean)
  40. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG. 2000. Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
  41. Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H. 2003. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. The Blackburn Press, New York, NY.
  42. Murphy J, Riley JP. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27: 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5
  43. Oh YJ, Lee CS. 2003. A taxonomic study on genus Rhynchospora Vahl in Korea. Korean J Plant Taxon 33: 393-409.
  44. Richards PW, Clapham AR. 1941a. Juncus L. J Ecol 29: 362-368. https://doi.org/10.2307/2256402
  45. Richards PW, Clapham AR. 1941b. Juncus effusus L. J Ecol 29: 375-380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2256404
  46. Riis T, Hawes I. 2002. Relationships between water level fluctuations and vegetation diversity in shallow water of New Zealand lakes. Aquat Bot 74: 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(02)00074-8
  47. Robinson GW. 1951. Soils: Their Origin, Constitution and Classification. An Introduction to Pedology. John Wiley, New York, NY.
  48. Sarma KS, Rogers SMD. 2000. Plant regeneration from seedling explants of Juncus effusus. Aquat Bot 68: 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(00)00112-1
  49. Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
  50. Sheldrick BH, Wang C. 1993. Particle size distribution. In: Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis (Carter MR, ed). Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 499-511.
  51. Solorzano L. 1969. Determination of ammonia in natural waters by the phenolhypochlorite method. Limnol Oceanogr 14: 799-801. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1969.14.5.0799
  52. Spence DHN. 1982. The zonation of plants in freshwater lakes. Adv Ecol Res 12: 37-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60077-X
  53. Stromberg JC. 2001. Restoration of riparian vegetation in the south-western United States: importance of flow regimes and fluvial dynamism. J Arid Environ 49: 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2001.0833
  54. Sturges HA. 1926. The choice of a class-interval. J Am Stat Assoc 21: 65-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1926.10502161
  55. Thompson K, Grime JP. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J Ecol 67: 893-921. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259220
  56. Topp GC. 1993. Soil water content. In: Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis (Carter MR, ed). Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 541-557.
  57. Troeh FR, Thompson LM. 1993. Soils and Soil Fertility. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  58. Wetzel RG, Howe MJ. 1999. High production in a herbaceous perennial plant achieved by continuous growth and synchronized population dynamics. Aquat Bot 64: 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00013-3
  59. Yoon J, Nam JM, Kim H, Bae YJ, Kim JG. 2010. Nannophya pygmaea (Odonata: Libellulidae), an endangered dragonfly in Korea, prefers abandoned paddy fields in the early seral stage. Environ Entomol 39: 278-285. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN09103

Cited by

  1. Assessment of genetic diversity of Typha angustifolia in the development of cattail stands vol.35, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2012.004
  2. Comparison of environmental characteristics at Cicuta virosa habitats, an endangered species in South Korea vol.36, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2013.003
  3. Analysis of Environmental Characteristics for Habitat Conservation and Restoration of Near Threatened Sparganium japonicum vol.18, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2015.18.1.37