Alteration in Surgical Technique of Tessier Classification Number 7 Cleft

Tessier 분류 7번 안면열의 수술방법의 변화

  • Bae, Yong-Chan (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kang, Kyung-Dong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-Hoon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Pusan National University)
  • 배용찬 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 강경동 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김경훈 (부산대학교 의학전문대학원 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.11.01
  • Accepted : 2011.02.15
  • Published : 2011.03.10

Abstract

Purpose: A Tessier classification number 7 cleft is an uncommon malformation that results from a failure of mesenchymal fusion within the maxillary and mandibular prominences of the 1st pharyngeal arch. Many operative techniques of the number 7 cleft repair have been proposed to restore function and improve aesthetics. Fifteen patients underwent repair of a number 7 cleft over 13 years by a modification of the surgical Technique, and an appraisal of the operative outcome is reported herein. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted involving 15 patients with number 7 clefts who underwent surgery from 1996 to 2009. The changes in surgical technique included skin closure, attachment of the orbicularis oris muscle, and position of the repaired commissure; the changes were analysed with a review of the medical records and the outcomes of surgery were analysed via photographs. Specifically, the technique of skin closure was changed from the a Z-plasty to a linear closure, the orbicularis oris muscle overlapped attachment was replaced by a side-to-side approximation with horizontal mattress sutures, and the position of the repaired commissure was changed from 1 mm laterally to 1 mm medially in reference to the non-cleft side. Results: A Z-plasty caused additional cutaneous scarring, an overlapped attachment of the orbicularis oris muscle caused a thick oral commissure, and the repaired commissure migrated to the lateral side, so a 1 mm, laterally-positioned commissure caused asymmetry. The altered procedure included a linear skin closure, a side-to-side orbicularis oris muscle approximation, and a 1 mm, medially-positioned commissure, which together resulted in a good outcome. Conclusion: The altered procedure for repair of a number 7 cleft as described herein, yields a short scar, no functional problems with the orbicularis oris muscle, a thin oral commissure, and symmetry of the repaired commissure.

Keywords

References

  1. Stark RB, Saunders DE: Th'e first branchial syndrome: the oral-mandibular-auricular syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 29: 229, 1962 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196203000-00001
  2. Kaplan EN: Commissuroplasty and myoplasty for macrostomia. Ann Plast Surg 7: 136, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198108000-00010
  3. Habal MB, Scheuerle J: Lateral facial clefts: closure with W-plasty and implications on speech and language development. Ann Plast Surg 11: 182, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198309000-00002
  4. McCarthy JG, Grayson BH, Coccaro PJ, Wood-Smith D: Craniofacial microsomia. In McCarthy JG, May JW, Littler JW (eds): Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Co., 1990, p 3054
  5. Rogers GF, Mulliken JB: Repair of transverse facial cleft in hemifacial microsomia: long-term anthropometric evaluation of commissural symmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 120: 728, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000270308.51699.40
  6. Kim SH, Park JJ, Park CK: The postoperative laterality of the oral commissure in lateral facial cleft. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 31: 589, 2004
  7. Han KH, Choi TH, Son DG, Park JW: Straight line closure for macrostomia repair. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 108: 866, 1999
  8. May H: Transverse facial clefts and their repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 29: 240, 1962 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196203000-00002
  9. Longacre JJ, Destefano GA, Holmstrand KE: The surgical management of first and second branchial arch syndromes. Plast Reconstr Surg 31: 507, 1963 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196306000-00002
  10. Boo Chai K: The transverse facial cleft: its repair. Br J Plast Surg 22: 119, 1969 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(69)80052-4
  11. Kim MS, Lee WJ, Park BY: Surgical Considerations and Refinements for Macrostomia Repair. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 31: 433, 2004
  12. Bauer BS, Wilkes GH, Kernahan DA: Incorporation of the W-plasty in repair of macrostomia. Plast Reconstr Surg 70: 752, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198212000-00019
  13. Torkut A, Coskunfirat OK: Double reversing Z-plasty for correction of transverse facial cleft. Plast Reconstr Surg 99: 885, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199703000-00045