Clinical Experiences of Facial Asymmetries in Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Bone Fracture Patients

관골상악골 복합체 골절 환자에서의 안면 비대칭에 대한 임상경험

  • Kang, Nak-Heon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Sang-Mun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Joo-Hak (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Song, Seung-Han (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Sang-Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University)
  • 강낙헌 (충남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 최상문 (충남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김주학 (충남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 송승한 (충남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 오상하 (충남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.11.23
  • Accepted : 2011.02.14
  • Published : 2011.03.10

Abstract

Purpose: Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture is one of the most common facial injuries after facial trauma. As ZMC composes major facial buttress, it is a key element of the facial contour. So, when we treat these fractures, the operator should have a concern with the symmetry to restore normal appearance and function. But sometimes, unfavorable results may occur. The aim of this study is to analyze the unsatisfied midfacial contour after ZMC fractures reduction retrospectively and to point out the notandum. Methods: 369 patients, treated for fractures of the ZMC were included in the study. After the operation, such as open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF with titanium or absorbable materials), open reduction, and closed reduction, midfacial contour was evaluated with plain films and 3-dimensional computed tomography. And unfavorable asymmetric midfacial contours were correcterd by secondary correction and re-evaluated. Gross photographs were obtained at outpatient clinic. Results: Total of 38 patients had got a facial asymmetry and among of them 24 patients were treated secondary revisional ORIF operations for correction of unfavorable result of after primary reduction. Two of them had received tertiary operations, three patients had got osteotomy more than after one year and six patients had got minor procedures. The etiology of asymmetry were lateral displaced simple fracture of arch (n=2), lateral displaced comminuted fracture of arch (n=6), comminuted arch fracture combined posterior root fracture (n=9), and communited arch and body fracture (n=12), severely contused soft tissue (n=9). After the manipulations outcomes were acceptable. Conclusion: To prevent the asymmetry in ZMC fracture reduction, complete analysis of fracture, choice of appropriate operation technique, consider soft tissue, and secure of zygoma position are important. Especially, we should be more careful about communited fracture of zygomatic body and lateral displacement, root fracture of zygomatic arch. Because they are commom causes that make facial asymmetry. To get optimal result, ensure the definite bony reduction.

Keywords

References

  1. Evans BG, Evans GR: MOC-PS SM CME article: zygomatic fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 121: 1, 2008
  2. Kang JS: Plastic surgery. 3rd ed, Seoul, Koonja, 2004, p 650
  3. Yang JH, Lee JH, Yang DB, Chung JY: Prevention of complication and management of unfavorable results in reduction malarplasty. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 35: 465, 2008
  4. Hollier LH, Thornton J, Pzamino P, Stal S: The management of orbitozygomatic fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 111: 2386, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000061010.42215.23
  5. Ellis E 3rd, Kittidumkerng W: Analysis of treatment for isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54: 386, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90107-X
  6. Mavili ME, Tuncbilek G: Treatment of noncomminuted zygoma fractures with percutaneous reduction and rigid external devices. J Craniofac Surg 16: 829, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.scs.0000180015.13975.8e
  7. Stanley RB Jr: The zygomatic arch as a quide to reconstruction of comminuted malar fractures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115: 1459, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1989.01860360061018
  8. Gruss JS, Van Wyck L, Phillips JH, Antonyshyn O: The importance of the zygomatic arch in complex midfacial fracture repair and correction of posttraumatic orbitozygomatic deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 85: 878, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199006000-00008
  9. Kurita M, Okazaki M, Ozaki M, Tanaka Y, Tsuji N, Takushima A, Harii K: Patient satisfaction after open reduction and internal fixation of zygomatic bone fractures. J Craniofac Surg 21: 45, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c36304
  10. Kelley P, Hopper R, Gruss J: Evaluation and treatment of zygomatic fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 120: 5S, 2007