장딴지 신경이식술 후 공여부 합병증에 대한 연구

Donor Site Morbidity after Sural Nerve Harvesting for Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction

  • 장정우 (한양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 최승석 (한양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이장현 (한양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 안희창 (한양대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 강낙헌 (충남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Chang, Jung-Woo (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Choi, M. Seung-Suk (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Jang-Hyun (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Ahn, Hee-Chang (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kang, Nak-Heon (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2010.10.28
  • 심사 : 2011.05.23
  • 발행 : 2011.07.10

초록

Purpose: Although the sural nerve is the most commonly used donor for autologous nerve graft, its morbidity after harvesting is sparsely investigated. The sural nerve being a sensory nerve, complications such as sensory changes in its area and neuroma can be expected. This study was designed to evaluate the donor site morbidity after sural nerve harvesting. Methods: Among the 13 cases, who underwent sural nerve harvesting between January 2004 and August 2009, 11 patients with proper follow up were included in the study. The collected data included harvested graft length, actual length of the grafted nerve, anesthetic and paresthetic area, presence of Tinel sign and symptomatic neuroma, and scar quality. Results: In 7 patients, no anesthetic area could be detected. Of the patients with a follow up period of more than 2 years, all the patients showed no anesthetic area except two cases who had a very small area of sensory deficit ($225mm^2$) on the lateral heel area, and large deficit ($4,500mm^2$) on the lateral foot aspect. The patients with a short follow up period (1~2 m) demonstrated a large anesthetic skin area ($6.760mm^2$, $12,500mm^2$). Only one patient had a Tinel sign. This patient also showed a subcutaneous neuroma, which was visible, but did not complain of discomfort during daily activities. One patient had a hypertrophic scar in the retromalleolar area, whereas the two other scars on the calf were invisible. Conclusion: After a period of 2 years the size of anesthetic skin in the lateral retromalleolar area is nearly zero. It is hypothesized that the size of sensory skin deficit may be large immediately after the operation. This area decreases over time so that after 2 years the patient does not feel any discomfort from nerve harvesting.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Coert JH, Dellon AL: Clinical implications of the surgical anatomy of the sural nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg 94: 850, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199411000-00016
  2. Ortiguela ME, Wood MB, Cahill DR: Anatomy of the sural nerve complex. J Hand Surg Am 12: 1119, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(87)80129-6
  3. WILLIAMS DD: A study of the human fibular communicating nerve. Anat Rec 120: 533, 1954 https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091200302
  4. Netter FH: Atlas of human anatomy. 4th ed., Elsevier, 2006, p 540
  5. Siemionow M, Sonmez E: Nerve allograft transplantation: a review. J Reconstr Microsurg 23: 511, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1022694
  6. Lohmeyer JA, Siemers F, Machens HG, Mailander P: The clinical use of artificial nerve conduits for digital nerve repair: a prospective cohort study and review of the literature. J Reconstr Microsurg 25: 55, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1103505
  7. Whitlock EL, Tuffaha SH, Luciano JP, Yan Y, Hunter DA, Magill CK, Moore AM, Tong AY, Mackinnon SE, Borschel GH: Processed allografts and type I collagen conduits for repair of peripheral nerve gaps. Muscle Nerve 39: 787, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.21220
  8. Slutsky DJ, Hentz VR: Peripheral nerve surgery. Churchill Livingstone, 2006, p 66
  9. Shenaq SM, Kim JYS: Repair and grafting of peripheral nerve. In Mathes (ed) Plastic Surgery. 1th ed, Saunders, 2006, p 733
  10. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL: Surgery of the peripheral nerve. Thieme Medical, 1988, p 104
  11. Aszmann OC, Muse V, Dellon AL: Evidence of in support of collateral sprouting after sensory nerve resection. Ann Plast Surg 37: 520, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199611000-00011
  12. Ehretsman RL, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE: Subjective recovery of nerve graft donor site. Ann Plast Surg 43: 606, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199912000-00005
  13. Lapid O, Ho ES, Goia C, Clarke HM: Evaluation of the sensory deficit after sural nerve harvesting in pediatric patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 119: 670, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000246521.83239.cd