Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure to Predict Wound Healing in Mild Diabetic Feet

경증의 당뇨발에서 창상치유 예측인자로서의 경피산소분압치

  • Jang, Seo-Yoon (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, Tae-Won (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Seung-Kyu (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Kyung (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • 장서윤 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 정태원 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 한승규 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김우경 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2011.03.28
  • Accepted : 2011.06.27
  • Published : 2011.09.10

Abstract

Purpose: Microcirculation of diabetic patients is commonly comporomised, regardless of the condition of the macrocirculation. Therefore, direct tissue oxygenation measurement is recommended in determining tissue viability and predicting wound healing potential. This study was designed to determine cut-off value of the tissue oxygenation in predicting wound healing in diabetic foot patients. Methods: This study included 41 feet of 41 diabetic foot patients who were treated in the Diabetic Wound Center of author's institution between January and June, 2009. Main inclusion criteria were type 1 or 2 diabetes and a foot ulcer (duration > 3 weeks) and ulcer area (from 1 $cm^2$ to 4 $cm^2$). Measurements of the area of diabetic foot ulcer were carried out before treatment. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure ($TcpO_2$) was measured at adjacent site of ulcer. The healing wound was defined as complete wound closure within 12 weeks. Results: Average diabetic foot ulcer areas with healing and nonhealing wounds were $2.67{\pm}0.76$ and $2.59{\pm}0.75\;cm^2$, respectively. There was no significant difference in the wound area between the groups. Average foot $TcpO_2$ in healing and nonhealing wounds were $68.56{\pm}23.07$ and $30.98{\pm}16.66$ mmHg, respectively ($p$ <0.01). The rate of healing wound increased as $TcpO_2$ increased. In particular, $TcpO_2$ lower than 40 mmHg and higher than 40 mmHg showed the most significant difference (wound healing rates of 25% and 71%, respectively). Conclusion: Based on the results of the study, the minimal $TcpO_2$ value thought to be required for adequate wound healing in diabetic wounds (cut-off value) is 40 mmHg.

Keywords

References

  1. Frykberg RG: Epidemiology of the diabetic foot: ulcerations and amputations. Adv Wound Care 12: 139, 1999
  2. Mayrovitz HN, Larsen PB: Functional microcirculatory impairment: a possible source of reduced skin oxygen tension in human diabetes mellitus. Microvasc Res 52: 115, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1006/mvre.1996.0048
  3. LoGerfo FW, Misare BD: Current management of the diabetic foot. Adv Surg 30: 417, 1996
  4. Mani R, Krentz AJ, Shearman CP: Diabetic foot amputation: the need for an objective assessment tool. Wounds 15: 241, 2003
  5. Fife CE, Buyukcakir C, Otto GH, Sheffield PJ, Warriner RA, Love TL, Mader J: The predictive value of transcutaneous oxygen tension measurement in diabetic lower extremity ulcers treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a retrospective analysis of 1144 patients. Wound Repair Regen 10: 198, 2002
  6. Kalani M, Brismar K, Fagrell B, Ostergren J, Jorneskog G: Transcutaneous oxygen tension and toe blood pressure as predictors for outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 22: 147, 1999 https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.1.147
  7. Bunt TJ, Holloway GA: $TcPO_2$ as an accurate predictor of therapy in limb salvage. Ann Vasc Surg 10: 224, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02001886
  8. Ballard JL, Eke CC, Bunt TJ, Killeen JD: A prospective evaluation of transcutaneous oxygen measurements in the management of diabetic foot problems. J Vasc Surg 22: 485, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70018-8
  9. Wagner FW Jr: The diabetic foot. Orthopedics 10: 163, 1987
  10. Hile C, Veves A: Diabetic neuropathy and microcirculation. Curr Diab Rep 3: 446, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-003-0006-0
  11. Hile C, Veves A: Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. In Johnstone MT, Veves A (eds) Microcirculation of the diabetic foot. 2nd ed, Totowa, Humana Press Inc., 2005, p 403
  12. Wautier JL, Guillausseau PJ: Advanced glycation end products, their receptors and diabetic angiopathy. Diabetes Metab 27: 535, 2001
  13. Morain WD, Colen LB: Wound healing in diabetes mellitus. Clin Plast Surg 17: 493, 1990
  14. Vinik AI, Erbas T, Park TS, Pierce KK, Stansberry KB: Methods for evaluation of peripheral neurovascular dysfunction. Diabetes Technol Ther 3: 29, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1089/152091501750220000
  15. Bacharach JM, Rooke TW, Osmundson PJ, Gloviczki P: Predictive value of transcutaneous oxygen pressure and amputation success by use of supine and elevation measurement. J Vasc Surg 15: 558, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(92)90196-F