Risk Factors of Tissue-Expander Infection in Breast Reconstruction

유방재건술에서 조직확장기 감염의 위험인자

  • Han, Sung-Bum (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Won (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lew, Dae-Hyun (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 한승범 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실.인체조직복원연구소) ;
  • 이동원 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실.인체조직복원연구소) ;
  • 유대현 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실.인체조직복원연구소)
  • Received : 2011.04.30
  • Accepted : 2011.06.21
  • Published : 2011.09.10

Abstract

Purpose: Implant-based breast reconstruction has multiple advantages such as decreased morbidity, shorter operative time and faster recovery. However, postoperative infection with tissue expander increases medical cost and causes a delay in concurrent antineoplastic treatment. To reduce tissue expander infection, it is important to identify related risk factors and minimize them when possible. Methods: A retrospective review of patient records in a single breast cancer center was performed. Eighty-six tissue expanders were placed in 80 women for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Variables including patients'age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative breast volume, operation time, drain indwelling time, postoperative seroma/hematoma formation, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were evaluated. Infection was defined as the status that shows any symptom of local inflammation and identification of pathogens. Representative values were compared through Student's t-test and univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: We examined 86 postmastectomy tissueexpanders which were placed between June 2004 and April 2010. Seven cases of tissue expander infection (8.1%) were identified. The infected tissue expander was removed in three of the cases. The relationship between BMI, and preoperative breast volume and that between infection and non-infection groups were significant ($p$ <0.05). Univariate analysis showed significant association between BMI ($p$=0.023) and preoperative breast volume ($p$=0.037). Multivariate analysis revealed that BMI and preoperative breast volume were independent variables regarding tissue expander infection. Conclusion: Certain characteristics of implant-based breast reconstruction patients increase infection rate of tissue expander. These risk factors should be monitored and evaluated before surgeries for more successful outcome.

Keywords

References

  1. Ellsworth WA, Bass BL, Skoracki RJ, Heller L: Breast reconstruction in women under 30: a 10-year experience. Breast J 17: 18, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01020.x
  2. McCarthy cm, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, Davidge K, Hinson A, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL: Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg 121: 1886, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817151c4
  3. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV: Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders and breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 113: 2098, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000122406.99750.C3
  4. Armstrong RW, Berkowitz RL, Bolding F: Infection following breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 23: 284, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198910000-00003
  5. Antony AK, McCarthy cm, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Teo EH, Arriaga AF, Disa JJ: Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 125: 1606, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d4fb2a
  6. August DA, Wilkins E, Rea T: Breast reconstruction in older women. Surgery 115: 663, 1994
  7. Walton L, Ommen K, Audisio RA: Breast reconstruction in elderly women breast cancer: a review. Cancer Treat Rev 2011
  8. Berry T, Brooks S, Sydow N, Djohan R, Nutter B, Lyons J, Dietz J: Complication rates of radiation on tissue expander and autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 3: 202, 2010
  9. Francis SH, Ruberg RL, Stevenson KB, Beck CE, Ruppert AS, Harper JT, Boehmler JH 4th, Miller MJ: Independent risk factors for infection in tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 124: 1790, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf80aa
  10. Pacella SJ, Vogel JE, Locke MB, Codner MA: Aesthetic and technical refinements in latissimus dorsi implant breast reconstruction: a 15-year experience. Aesthet Surg J 31: 190, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X10395506
  11. McCarthy cm, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Cordeiro PG: The effect of closed-suction drains on the incidence of local wound complications following tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a cohort study. Plast Reconstr Surg 119: 2018, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000260586.55628.29
  12. Spear SL, Seruya M: Management of the infected or exposed breast prosthesis: a single surgeon's 15-year experience with 69 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 125: 1074, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d17fff
  13. Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL: Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 124: 395, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee987