DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of Crop Residue-Derived Biochars Produced by Field Scale Biomass Pyrolyzer

  • Jung, Won-K. (Delta Research Center, University of Missouri-Columbia)
  • Received : 2010.12.28
  • Accepted : 2011.02.22
  • Published : 2011.02.28

Abstract

Application of biochar to soils is proposed as a significant, long-term, sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide in terrestrial ecosystems. In addition to reducing emissions and increasing the sequestration of carbon, production of biochar and its application to soils will contribute improve soil quality and crop productivity. Objectives were i) to evaluate biochar productivity from crop residues using a low-cost field scale mobile pyrolyzer and ii) to evaluate characteristics of feedstocks and biochars from locally collected crop residues. Pyrolysis experiments were performed in a reactor operated at $400-500^{\circ}C$ for 3-4 hours using biomass samples of post-harvest residues of corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium spp.), rice (Oryza sativa L.), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Feedstocks differed, but average conversion to biochar was 23%. Carbon content of biomass feedstock and biochar samples were 445 g $kg^{-1}$ and 597 g $kg^{-1}$, respectively. Total carbon content of biochar samples was 34% higher than its feedstock samples. Significant increases were found in P, K, Ca, Mg, and micro-nutrients contents between feedstock and biochar samples. Biochar from corn stems and rice hulls can sequester by 60% and 49% of the initial carbon input into biochar respectively when biochar is incorporated into the soils. Pyrolysis conversion of corn and rice residues sequestered significant amounts of carbon as biochar which has further environmental and production benefits when applied to soils. Field experiment with crop residue biochar will be investigated the stability of biochars to show long-term carbon sequestration and environmental influences to the cropping systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Alves A., M. Schwanninger, H. Pereira, and J. Rodrigues. 2006. Analytical pyrolysis as a direct method to determine the lignin content in wood: Part 1: Comparison of pyrolysis lignin with Klason lignin. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 76:209-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2005.11.004
  2. Baldock, J. and R. Smernik. 2002. Chemical composition and bioavailability of thermally altered Pinus resinosa (Red pine) wood. Organic Geochemistry 33:1093-1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(02)00062-1
  3. Cunha, T., B. Madari, L. Canellas, L. Ribeiro, V. Benites, and G. Santos. 2009. Soil organic matter and fertility of anthropogenic dark earths (Terra Preta de Índio) in the Brazilian Amazon basin. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 33:85-93. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832009000100009
  4. DeLuca, T., M. MacKenzie, and M. Gundale. 2009. Biochar Effects on Soil Nutrient Transformations. In: Lehmann J and Joseph S. (eds.) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology:pp., 251-285. Eatthscan Publishing: London, Sterlin, VA.
  5. Demirba, A. 2001. Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy Conversion and Management 42:1357-1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00137-0
  6. Glaser, B. 2007. Prehistorically modified soils of central Amazonia: a model for sustainable agriculture in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362:187. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1978
  7. Glaser, B., E. Balashov, L. Haumaier, G. Guggenberger, and W. Zech. 2000. Black carbon in density fractions of anthropogenic soils of the Brazilian Amazon region. Organic Geochemistry 31:669-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00044-9
  8. Goldstein, I. and C.R. Company. 1981. Organic chemicals from biomass. CRC press Boca Raton, FL.
  9. Hansen J., M. Sato, P. Kharecha, D. Beerling, R. Berner, V. Masson-Delmotte, M. Pagani, M. Raymo, D. Royer, and J. Zachos 2008. Target atmospheric $CO_2$: Where should humanity aim? Open Atmospheric Science Journal 2:217-231. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874282300802010217
  10. Howard, J. 1981. Fundamentals of coal pyrolysis and hydropyrolysis. Chemistry of Coal Utilization 2:665-784.
  11. Jones Jr., J. and V. Case. 1990. Sampling, handling, and analyzing plant tissue samples. Soil Testing and Plant Analysis 3:389-428.
  12. Lal, R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097396
  13. Lehmann, J. 2007a. Bio-energy in the black. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:381-387. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[381:BITB]2.0.CO;2
  14. Lehmann, J. 2007b. A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/447143a
  15. Lehmann, J. 2009. Biological carbon sequestration must and can be a win-win approach. Climatic Change 97:459-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9695-y
  16. Lehmann, J., J. Gaunt, and M. Rondon. 2006. Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems-a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11:395-419 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5
  17. Liang, P., Z. Wang, and J. Bi. 2007. Process characteristics investigation of simulated circulating fluidized bed combustion combined with coal pyrolysis. Fuel Processing Technology 88:23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.05.005
  18. Liao, N. and S. Marten. 2001. Determination of total phosphorus by flow injection analysis colorimetry (acid persulfate digestion method). $ QuikChem^{\circledR}$ Method:10-115.
  19. Malhi, S., R. Lemke, Z. Wang, and B. Chhabra. 2006. Tillage, nitrogen and crop residue effects on crop yield, nutrient uptake, soil quality, and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil and Tillage Research 90:171-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.09.001
  20. McHenry, M. 2009. Agricultural bio-char production, renewable energy generation and farm carbon sequestration in Western Australia: Certainty, uncertainty and risk. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 129:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.006
  21. McKendry, P. 2002. Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresource Technology 83:37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00118-3
  22. Merry, R. and L. Spouncer. 1988. The measurement of carbon in soils using a microprocessor-controlled resistance furnace. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 19:707-720. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628809367969
  23. Mohan, D., C. Pittman Jr., and P. Steele. 2006. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuels 20:848-889. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0502397
  24. Oasmaa, A., D. Elliott, and S. Müller. 2009. Quality control in fast pyrolysis bio-oil production and use. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 28:404-409. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10382
  25. Soil Survey Staff. 1997. Keys to soil taxonomy. Pocahontas Press, Blacksburg, VA.
  26. Teasdale, J., A. Abdul-Baki, and Y. Bong Park. 2008. Sweet corn production and efficiency of nitrogen use in high cover crop residue. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 28:559-565. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008029
  27. Teng, H., H. Lin, and J. Ho. 1997. Thermogravimetric analysis on global mass loss kinetics of rice hull pyrolysis. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 36:3974-3977. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie970017z
  28. Thomas, G. 1982. Exchangeable cations. In: A.L Page (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis, PArt 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd edition. Agronomy 9:159-165.
  29. Van Zwieten, L., S. Kimber, S. Morris, K. Chan, A. Downie, J. Rust, S. Joseph, and A. Cowie. 2010. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant and Soil 327:235-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x
  30. Wendt, K. 1997. Determination of total Kjeldahl nitrogen by flow injection analysis colorimetry (block digestor method). QuikChem Method:10-107.
  31. Zhang, X., S. Kondragunta, C. Schmidt, and F. Kogan. 2008. Near real time monitoring of biomass burning particulate emissions (PM2. 5) across contiguous United States using multiple satellite instruments. Atmospheric Environment 42:6959-6972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.04.060

Cited by

  1. Pyrolysis of crop residues in a mobile bench-scale pyrolyser: Product characterization and environmental performance vol.119, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.03.018
  2. Effect of Carbonized Biomass Application on Organic Carbon Accumulation and Soy Bean Yields in Upland Soil vol.49, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2016.49.1.001
  3. Rice Yield Response to Biochar Application Under Different Water Managements Practices vol.45, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2012.45.1.016
  4. Effect of Carbonized Biomass Derived from Pruning on Soil Carbon Pools in Pear Orchard vol.35, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2016.35.3.26