DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigating multi-attributes for expanding new renewable energy in agricultural sectors : Applying the analytic hierarchy process

농업부문 신재생에너지 보급확대를 위한 다중속성 평가

  • Lee, Sang-Ho (Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Park, Jae-Hong (Dept. of Food & Resource Economics, Yeungnam University)
  • 이상호 (순천대학교 농업경제학과) ;
  • 박재홍 (영남대학교 식품자원경제학과)
  • Received : 2011.02.01
  • Accepted : 2011.03.09
  • Published : 2011.03.30

Abstract

The paper is to analyze multi-attributes for expanding new renewable energy in agricultural sectors which have environmental, technical, economic, and social factors consisting of 15 attributes which have both positive and negative impacts. We applied the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to data from opinion polls. As a result of the AHP survey, the overall results indicate that the respondents more weight on economical factor than environmental, technical, and social factors for expanding new renewable energy. At the lowest level, a comparison of individual 15 attributes within three factors shows that fixed cost highest in multi-attributes, followed by operating cost, technical superiority. To achieve the public acceptance about expanding new renewable energy in agricultural sectors, the policy-makers should take all relevant factors into account through the decision-making process by the public opinions.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim YJ. 2010. Utilization and policy for new renewable energy in agriculture. Proceedings of New Renewable Energy for Agriculture in Developed Countries: Utilization and Policy International Symposium. 1-41
  2. Kwon YD, Lee SH. 2010. Investigating multi-attributes for rural water development project impacts in regional areas: applying the analytic hierarchy process. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy 37(1): 55-69. [in Korean]
  3. Kwak SJ, Yoo SJ, Shin CO. 2002. Applying AHP to evaluation process of national nuclear R&D projects. Journal of Technology Innovation. 10(1): 201-217. [in Korean]
  4. Korea Energy Economics Institute. 2009. Yearbook of Energy Statistics.
  5. Lee CY. 2009. A Study on Countermeasures in New Highoil- price Era: Economic Evaluation of Countermeasures in New High-oil-price Era. Korea Energy Economics Institute. [in Korean]
  6. Jang KY. 2010. An study on indicator selection of renewable energy business evaluation. POSRI Business Review 10(1): 116-140. [in Korean]
  7. Friedman TL. 2008. Hot, Flat, and Crowded. 21 Century Books, Korea. [in Korean]
  8. Bank of Korea Gangwon Branch. 2009. Measures for Improving Gangwon-do New and Renewable Energy. [in Korean]
  9. Satty TL. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGrawHill, New York.
  10. Satty TL. 2000. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publication.