DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of evaluation indicators for riparian restoration with biodiversity consideration

생물다양성 확보를 위한 하안 복원 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구

  • Park, Eun-Young (Graduate School, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Jae-Yong (Dept. of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyoun-Sook (Institute of Agricultural Science, Chungnam National University)
  • 박은영 (충남대학교 대학원) ;
  • 최재용 (충남대학교 산림환경자연학과) ;
  • 김현숙 (충남대학교 농업과학연구소)
  • Received : 2011.03.30
  • Accepted : 2011.06.20
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

In order to revive the ecological function of degraded rivers, a total restoration plan for riverbeds and riparians needs to be developed. Previous evaluations for rivers were mainly focused on the river's physical structures. Therefore, this research has developed indicators to evaluate a riparian restoration considering biodiversity. Through literature and previous cases review, 4 fields and 13 indicators are selected for the evaluation. Four fields are biodiversity, habitat diversity, connectivity and habitat functionality. In the biodiversity field, 4 indicators of the exuberant extent of herbaceous vegetation and their diversity, the exuberant extent of shrub and woody plants and their diversity, the number of plant communities and naturalized plants are included. Habitat diversity are comprised of 4 indicators of the longitudinal continuity of vegetation, the mixture of plant communities, the extent of plant type color fruit abundance and the distribution of vegetation. Connectivity includes 3 indicators of target distribution, the shore slope of low water channels and the extent of artificial embankment materials. Habitat functionality has 2 indicators of the status of food supply plants and the habitat functionality. The value weighting for the fields and indicators has been calculated based on the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. 50 experts were surveyed with quantifiable questionnaire, among them 43 experts have more than 10 yesrs experiences in the nature restoration field. The selected and weighted indicators have been tested to the 12 sections in Gap stream located in Daejeon. In conclusion, the indicators are feasible and the selected indicators could be used to establish the direction and objectives of riparian restoration.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi J. 2010. Stratagies for the Natural Aspect of Environmental Impact Assessment Considering CBD. KEI. 87 pp. [in Korean]
  2. Jo GH. 2000. Riparian Vegetation in the understanding of the structure and function for river restoration. Korea Water Resources Association 33(3): 29-40. [in Korean]
  3. Jo GT, Jo YG, Gang HS. 2005. Analytic Hierarchy Process of Leading leaders. Dong Hyun Press. pp. 5-9. [in Korean]
  4. KICT (Korea Institute of Construction Techology). 1995. Study on Efficient Management of Ecosystem Conservation Areas. Environmental Management Corporation. 123 pp. [in Korean]
  5. KDI (Korea Development Institute). 2000. Multicriteria Analysis Study for Conducting a Feasibility Study. 244 pp. [in Korean]
  6. Klingeman PC. 2000. River Restoration Design and Stability. Short Course 4. Proceedings of 2000 Joint Conference on Water and Water Resources Planning and Management ASCE. Minneapolis.
  7. Lee BH. 1992. Crisis and Prospects of Biodiversity. Nature Conservation 78: 2-7. [in Korean]
  8. Lee WT. 1996. Lineamenta Florae Korea. Academy press, Seoul. [in Korean]
  9. MC (Ministry of Construction. 1992. River Research and Study on Development of Environmental Management Scheme: River Environmental Management Indicators Report on Research and Development. pp. 153-160. [in Korean]
  10. ME (Ministry Of Environment). 1997. Environmental White Paper. pp. 107-121. [in Korean]
  11. Raunkiaer C. 1934. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plants Geography being the collected Papers of C. Raunkiaer. Clarendon press, Oxford.
  12. Tamai, NSO and Nakamuram S. 2000. Assessing Ricerine Environments for Habitat Suitability on the Basis of Natural Potential. Univ. of Tokyo Press. pp. 1-270.
  13. Woo HS. 2000a. Understanding of riparian restoration(I) - Based on guidelines of the United States to restore riparian. The Magazine of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers 48(7): 66-71. [in Korean]
  14. Woo HS. 2000b. Understanding of riparian restoration(II) - Based on guidelines of the United States to restore riparian. The Magazine of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers 48(8): 54-60. [in Korean]