Korean Journal of Agricultural Science (농업과학연구)

Institute of Agricultural Science, CNU (충남대학교 농업과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of streamflow runoff model in Korea for applying to reservoir operation

저수지 운영을 위한 한국 하천 유출 모형의 비교

  • Noh, Jae-Kyoung (Dept. of Agricultural and Rural Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Nam (Dept. of Agricultural Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • 노재경 (충남대학교 지역환경토목학과) ;
  • 이재남 (충남대학교 대학원 농공학과)
  • Received : 2011.09.05
  • Accepted : 2011.09.19
  • Published : 2011.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To evaluate the applicability of inflow runoff model to reservoir operation in Korea, DAWAST model and TPHM model which are conceptual lumped daily runoff model and were developed in Korea, were selected and applied to simulate inflows to Daecheong multipurpose dam with watershed area of 4,134 $km^2$, and water storages in Geryong reservoir with watershed area of 15.1 $km^2$ and total water storage of 3.4 M $m^3$. Evaluating inflows on an yearly, monthly, ten-day, and daily basis, inflows by DAWAST model showed balanced scatters around equal value line. But inflow by TPHM model showed high in high flows. Annual mean water balance by DAWAST model was rainfall of 1,159.9 mm, evapotranspiration of 622.1 mm, and inflow of 644.6 mm, from which rainfall was 104.8 mm less than sum of evapotranspiration and inflow, and showed unbalanced result. Water balance by TPHM model showed satisfactory result. Reservoir water storages were shown to simulate on a considerable level from applying DAWAST and TPHM models to simulate inflows to Geryong reservoir. But it was concluded to be needed to improve DAWAST and TPHM model together from imbalance of water balance and low estimation in high flow.

Keywords

References

  1. Anctil F, Perrin C, Andréassian V. 2004. Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models. Environmental Modelling & Software 19(4): 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00135-X
  2. Barakat SA, Altoubat S. 2009. Application of evolutionary global optimization techniques in the design of RC water tanks. Engineering Structures 31(2): 332-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.09.006
  3. Clarke RT. 2008. A critique of present procedures used to compare performance of rainfall-runoff models. Journal of Hydrology 352(3-4): 379-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.01.026
  4. Chen J, Adams BJ. 2006. Integration of artificial neural networks with conceptual models in rainfall-runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology 318(1-4): 232-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.017
  5. Cooper VA, Nguyen VTA, Nicell JA. 2007. Calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models using global optimisation methods with hydrologic process-based parameter constraints. Journal of Hydrology 334(3-4): 455-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.036
  6. Das T, Bárdossy A, Zehe E, He Y. 2008. Comparison of conceptual model performance using different representations of spatial variability. Journal of Hydrology 356(1-2): 106-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.04.008
  7. Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta VK. 1994. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology 158(3-4): 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90057-4
  8. Gomez JA, Nearing MA, Giraldez JV, Alberts EE. 2001. Analysis of sources of variability of runoff volume in a 40 plot experiment using a numerical model. Journal of Hydrology 248(1-4): 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00402-4
  9. Huang W, Ye T. 2011. Global optimization method for finding dense packings of equal circles in a circle. European Journal of Operational Research 210(3): 474-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.020
  10. Hundecha Y, Bardossy A. 2004. Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model. Journal of Hydrology 292(1-4): 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.01.002
  11. Jakeman AJ, Littlewood IG, Whitehead PG. 1990. Computation of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two small upland catchments. Journal of Hydrology 117(1-4): 275-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90097-H
  12. Kim HJ. 2001. Development of two-parametric hyperbolic model for daily streamflow simulation. Ph. D. dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean).
  13. Kuchment LS, Gelfan AN, Demidov VN. 2000. A distributed model of runoff generation in the permafrost regions. Journal of Hydrology 240(1-2): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00318-8
  14. Lee H, McIntyre N, Wheater H, Young A. 2005. Selection of conceptual models for regionalisation of the rainfall-runoff relationship. Journal of Hydrology 312(1-4): 125-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.016
  15. Lidén R, Harlin J. 2000. Analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling performance in different climates. Journal of Hydrology 238(3-4): 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00330-9
  16. Mathews JH. 1987. Numerical Methods for Computer Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. pp. 295-302. Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
  17. Ministry of Agriculture and Forest (MAF), Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC). 1998. Hydrological Survey Report for Planning Conservation of Water Quality in Lake Saemangeum. (in Korean).
  18. Ministry of Construction and Transportation (MOCT), Korean Water Resources Corporation (KOWACO). 2006. 2020 Water Vision(Modified). (in Korean).
  19. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTM). 2009. Master Plan for 4 Major Rivers Restoration Project. (in Korean).
  20. Moretti G, Montanari A. 2007. AFFDEF: A spatially distributed grid based rainfall-runoff model for continuous time simulations of river discharge. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(6): 823-836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.02.012
  21. Nandakumar N, Mein RG. 1997. Uncertainty in rainfall-runoff model simulations and the implications for predicting the hydrologic effects of land-use change. Journal of Hydrology 192(1-4): 211-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03106-X
  22. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I- A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
  23. Noh JK. 1991. A conceptual watershed model for daily streamflow based on soil water storage. Ph. D. dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean).
  24. Noh JK. 2003. Applicability of the DAWAST considered return flows. Journal of the Korean Water Resources Association 39(11): 1095-1105. (in Korean).
  25. Noh JK. 2004. A system for estimating daily paddy irrigation water requirements in simulating daily streamflow. Journal of Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 46(7): 71-80. https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2004.46.7.071
  26. Noh JK, Lee JN, Kim YK. 2010. Development of standardized water balance model for applying irrigation district in South Korea. Journal of Agricultural Science 37(1): 105-112. (in Korean).
  27. Ozelkan EC, Duckstein L. 2001. Fuzzy conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Journal of Hydrology 253(1-4): 41-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00430-9
  28. Perrin C, Michel C, Andreassian V. 2001. Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. Journal of Hydrology 242(3-4): 275-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00393-0
  29. Post DA, Jakeman JA. 1999. Predicting the daily streamflow of ungauged catchments in S.E. Australia by regionalising the parameters of a lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff model. Ecological Modelling 123(2-3): 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00125-8
  30. Post DA, Jones JA, Grant GE. 1998. An improved methodology for predicting the daily hydrologic response of ungauged catchments. Environmental Modelling & Software 13(3-4): 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(98)00044-9
  31. Province of Chungcheongnam-do (POC). 2008. Plan on Guryong Stream. (in Korean).
  32. Refsgaard JC, Van der Sluijs JP, Brown J, Van der Keur P. 2006. A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error. Advances in Water Resources 29(11): 1586-1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.11.013
  33. Seibert J. 1999. Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfall-runoff model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 98-99: 279-293.
  34. Xu P. 2002. A hybrid global optimization method: the onedimensional case. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 47(2): 301-314.
  35. Young AR. 2006. Stream flow simulation within UK ungauged catchments using a daily rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrology 320(1-2): 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.017