DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimating Quality Adjusted Life Year Loss of Persons Disabled by Stroke Using EQ-5D in Korea

EQ-5D를 이용한 뇌졸중 장애인의 질보정수명 감소분 추정

  • Jo, Min-Woo (Dept. of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Kyu (Dept. of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Dongguk University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Yong (Dept. of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Lee, Kyeong-Soo (Dept. of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University)
  • 조민우 (울산대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 김상규 (동국대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 이진용 (건양대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 이경수 (영남대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2011.06.02
  • Accepted : 2011.06.24
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to measure health related quality of life (HRQOL) of persons disabled by stroke dwelling in Gyeongju-si using EQ-5D and to estimate total QALYs loss of persons disabled by stroke in Korea. The eligible subjects were 982 persons with stroke aged 50 and over in Gyeongju-si disabled registry, as of March, 2008. Interviewers measured HRQOL of study subjects using EQ-5D. EQ-5D index, utility weight, was derived from the Korean valuation set. In order to compare the results of this study, we selected two comparison groups representing Korean healthy population and general population of Korean using the 4th Korean National Health & Nutrition Examination Survey. Finally, after age and gender standardization, we estimated the total QALYs losses of persons disabled by stroke in Korea. Of 982 eligible subjects, 566 persons participated in the survey (response rate: 57.6%). In both of female and male, utility weights in the 70s or 80s were lower than those of the 50s or 60s. Utility weights differences among persons with disability, general population, and healthy population in male were larger than those differences in female. Total estimated QALY losses of persons disabled by stroke were 67,011.6 QALYs lower than healthy control group and 54,167.1 QALYs lower than general population, respectively.

목적: 뇌졸중으로 인한 장애인이 증가하고 있으나 이들을 대상으로 질보정수명을 구한 연구가 없었다. 이 연구의 목적은 일개 시에서 뇌졸중 장애인을 대상으로 EQ-5D로 그들의 건강 관련 삶의 질 수준을 평가하고, 우리나라 전체 뇌졸중 장애인의 QALYs 감소분을 추정하기 위하여 수행 하였다. 방법: 2008년 3월을 기준으로 경주시 장애인 등록현황에서 50세 이상인 장애인 중 뇌졸중이 원인으로 파악된 982명을 대상으로 설문조사자들이 방문하여 대면면접조사를 통해 일반적 특성, 임상적 특성, EQ-5D 등의 자료를 수집하였다. 제4기 국민건강영양조사 에서 일반인구집단과 동반질환이 없는 군을 건강비교군으로 선정하여 성별, 연령별 표준화를 통해 비교함으로써 효용 가중치 차이를 구하였다. 이 효용 가중치 차이를 우리나라 전체 뇌졸중 장애인에 적용하여 전체 QALYs 감소분을 추정하였다. 결과: 대상자 982명 중 조사응답자는 566명으로 응답률은 57.6%였다. 여성, 70대 이상군에서 EQ-5D 지표값이 남성이나 60대 이하군에 비해 더 낮았고, 상대 비교군과의 차이도 크게 나타났다. 건강비교군과 일반인구집단 비교군과의 비교에 따른 전체 QALYs 감소분은 각각 연간 67,011.6 QALYs와 54,167.1 QALYs로 추정되었다. 결론: EQ-5D로 우리나라 전체 뇌졸중장애인의 QALYs 감소분을 추정하였고, 이 연구를 바탕으로 뇌졸중 장애인을 대상으로 한 공중보건정책의 집행이나 평가를 수행하여 보다 근거에 기반한 장애인 정책을 수행할 수 있을 것으로 생각한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Employment and Labor, Korea Employment Agency for the Disabled. 2009 Statistics for the Disabled. GyeongGi-Do Seongnam City, Korea Employment Agency for the Disabled; 2009, pp.165-170 (Korean)
  2. Byeon YC, Kim SH, Yun SY, Kang MH, Choi MY, Soen CK, Oh HK. Survey for the Disabled. Seoul. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2009:118-140 (Korean)
  3. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality of life outcomes. N Engl J Med 1996;334(13):835-840 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199603283341306
  4. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stodart G, Torrance G. Methods for the Economic evaluation of health care programs. 3rd ed. New York, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp.124-126
  5. EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199-208 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
  6. Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP. Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper Res 1982;30:1043-1069 https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.30.6.1043
  7. Patric DL, Bush JW, Chen MM. Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index. Health Serv Res 1973;8:228-245
  8. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002;21(2):271-292 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8
  9. Fischer U, Anca D, Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Kappeler L, Ballinari P et al. Quality of life in stroke survivors after local intra-arterial thrombolysis. Cerebrovasc dis 2008;25(5):438-444 https://doi.org/10.1159/000126917
  10. Solli O, Stavem K, Kristiansen IS. Health-related quality of life in diabetes: The associations of complications with EQ-5D scores. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010;8:18 https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-18
  11. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997;35(11):1095-1108 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002
  12. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005;43(3):203-220 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003
  13. Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N, Nishimura S, Saki I, Fukuda T et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ 2002;11(4):341-353 https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.673
  14. Lee YK, Nam HS, Chuang LH, Kim KY, Yang HK, Kwon IS et al. South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states. Value Health 2009;12(8):1187-1193 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00579.x
  15. Jo MW, Yun SC, Lee SI. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D health states with the time trade-off method in South Korea. Value Health 2008;11(7):1186-1189 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00348.x
  16. Kang EJ, Shin HS, Park HJ, Jo MW, Kim NY. A valuation of health state using EQ-5D. The Korean Journal of Health Economics and Policy 2006;12(2):19-43 (Korean)
  17. Lee KW, Ha MK, Ha KS, Kim RB, Park KS. The association of social support and quality of life of stroke patients in a city. J Agri Med & Community Health 2010;35(1):46-55 (Korean) https://doi.org/10.5393/JAMCH.2010.35.1.046
  18. Jo MW, Bae HJ. One-year health related quality of life and its comparison with various clinical and functional scale in hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke: Seoul National University Bundang Stroke Registry Study. J Korean Neurol Assoc 2009;27(1):28-35 (Korean)
  19. Kang EJ, Ko SK. A catalogue of EQ-5D utility weights for chronic disease among noninstitutionalized community residents in Korea. Value Health 2009;12(3):S114-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00642.x
  20. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV), 2009 (Korean)
  21. Ministry of Health and Welfare: The present condition for the registry of persons disabled in 2008; 2009[cited 2011 April 15] Available from: URL: http://stat.mw.go.kr/_common/board_file_dn.jsp? BOARD_ID=260&CONT_SEQ=10955&FILE_SEQ=1192
  22. Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F. The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: A European perspective. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003, pp.103-166

Cited by

  1. Estimating Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Loss Due to Noncommunicable Diseases in Korean Adults through to the Year 2040 vol.18, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.008
  2. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in Korean older workers vol.27, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-015-0077-9
  3. A Study about the Quality of Life and QALYs of Stroke Patients according to the Medical Care Utilization Behavior: Findings from the 2009–2012 Korea Health Panel Data vol.37, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.16005