Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회지)

The Korean Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Revitalization of the Conciliation System for Defect Disputes Related to Apartment Buildings - On the Technical Issue -

공동주택 하자분쟁 조정제도의 활성화 방안- 기술적 쟁점사항에 대한 대응전략을 중심으로 -

  • Park, Jun-Mo (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Ok-Kyue (Department of Architectural Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Lee (Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering Management, California State University)
  • Received : 2011.01.18
  • Accepted : 2011.05.03
  • Published : 2011.06.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, the arbitration system for defect disputes has been introduced to settle the disputes arising from defects in apartment buildings. However, the conciliation system did not reflect the current technical issues of defect disputes and the opinions of each party involved in the disputes. Moreover, it revealed more imperfections in the content and the process of the system itself. Therefore, this study aims to review the technical aspects of defect disputes, and suggest an alternative to the conventional conciliation system. This paper also discusses logical factors that can be addressed for the current subjective judgment. It is recommended that each party involved in the defect dispute build mutual trust in order to meet social needs, which is the underlying support for the revitalization of the institutional level.

공동주택 하자분쟁을 해결하고자 하는 노력의 일환으로 최근 하자분쟁조정제도가 도입되었다. 하지만, 당해 제도는 현재의 하자분쟁의 쟁점사항과 분쟁 당사자들의 입장을 제대로 반영하고 있지 못하다. 또한, 제도의 내용과 절차에서 많은 미비점이 존재한다. 본 연구에서는 하자분쟁의 여러 내용적인 측면 중에서 기술적 쟁점사항에 대해 정리하고 하자분쟁조정제도가 정착되기 위한 대안마련을 검토하였다. 그 결과 현행 하자분쟁의 판정논리체계요소에 대해 정리할 수 있었고, 이에 효과적으로 대응하기 위한 전략으로서 활성화 방안을 제시하였다. 그 기본 원칙은 조정자와 분쟁 당사자간의 신뢰관계를 구축해야 하는 것이며, 사회적 기대사항에 대한 부합, 제도적 차원의 활성화 방안이 뒷받침되어야 할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Jang ss. [Transition of Housing Market and Countermeasures of Housing Firms]. Seoul (Korea): Korea Housing Institute; 1999. 76 p. Korean.
  2. Seo DS, Cho KR. [A Study on the Direction of Defect lawsuit Solutions on Apartment Buildings from Resident`s Respect]. journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction. 2008 Jun;24(6):119-26. Korean.
  3. Financial News [Internet]. Seoul: [cited 2006 December 25] Construction firms are at law; Available from: http://www.fnnews.com/view?ra=Sent0501m_View&corp=fnnews&arcid=00000920888371&cDateYear=2006&cDateMonth=12&cDateDay=25. Korean.
  4. Park JM, Choi JH. [The overseas statue and related legislative system about defect dispute in apartment building]. Construction Engineering and Management. 2010 Apr;11(2):17-8. Korean.
  5. Park JM, Choi Jh, Seo DS, Kim OK. [A study on the cost property of apartment house defect claim related on the precedent]. 2009. Nov 19-20; Daejeon. Seoul (Korea): Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management; 2009. p. 237-41. Korean.
  6. Seo DS, Choi JH, Kim OK, Park KW, Cho JH, Park JM, Kim KH. [A study on use state of defect deposite based on actual use data]. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2010 Apr;10(2):81-8. Korean. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2010.10.2.081
  7. Kang YM, Kim BS, Park JM, Choi JH, Seo DS, Kim OK. [Regression analysis on the dispute cost property in apartment housing claims]. Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference; 2010. May 14; Seoul. Seoul (Korea): the Korea Institute of Building Construction; 2010. p. 225-8. Korean.
  8. You YW. An analytic study on influencing factors of maintenance costs in apartment housing by defect claim precedents [master's thesis]. Cheongju (Korea): ChungBuk National University; 2010. 82 p. Korean.
  9. Rhim HG, Lee TH. Dictionary of law. Paju (Korea): Bobmunsa; 2007. 2132 p. Korean.
  10. Seoul south district court. Case-No.2007가합10079. Korea, Seoul:Seoul south district court; 2008.09.19. Korean.
  11. Seoul south district court. Case-No.2002가합7931. Korea, Seoul:Seoul south district court; 2004.09.16. Korean.
  12. Seoul central district court. Case-No.2005가합86083. Korea, Seoul:Seoul central district court; 2007.10.19. Korean.
  13. Seoul south district court. Case-No.2004가합20105. Korea, Seoul:Seoul south district court; 2008.12.04. Korean.
  14. Seoul central district court. Case-No.2004가합53499. Korea, Seoul:Seoul central district court; 2006.10.10. Korean.
  15. Seoul central district court. Case-No.2004가합1100521. Korea, Seoul:Seoul central district court; 2006.12.19. Korean.
  16. Seoul south district court. Case-No.2003가합14226. Korea, Seoul:Seoul south district court; 2007.11.22. Korean.
  17. Newsis [Internet]. Seoul: [cited 2009 April 7] Sweep to authenticate the defect lawsuit of apartment building by giving a bribe;Available from: http://www.newsis.com/article/view.htm?cID= &ar_id=NISX20090407_0001841900. Korean.
  18. Daejeon district court. Case-No.2007가합845. Korea, Daejeon: Daejeon district court; 2008.08.14. Korean.
  19. Choi JH, Park JM, Seo DS, Jo JH, Park KW, Kim OK. [A study on legal issues about defect repair claim on apartment building]. journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction 2009 Oct;25(11):147-53. Korean
  20. Seoul central district court. Case-No.2006가합77437. Korea, Seoul:Seoul central district court; 2008.10.28. Korean.
  21. Korea concrete institute (KR). Standard concrete construction specification. Seoul (Korea): Kimoondang; 2009. 360 p. Korean.
  22. Daejeon high court. Case-No.2004나7420. Korea, Daejeon :Daejeon district court; 2007.01.26. Korean.
  23. Center for housing renovation and dispute settlement support (JA). Law of perform a guaranty for a house by cartoon. Tokyo: Center for housing renovation and dispute settlement support; 2010. 18 p. Japanese.
  24. Center for housing renovation and dispute settlement support (JA). Chord report 2010. Tokyo: Center for housing renovation and dispute settlement support; 2010. 10 p. Japanese.

Cited by

  1. Why do residents participate in neighborhood associations? The case of apartment neighborhood associations in Seoul, South Korea 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1319229
  2. Analysis of Consulting Reports on Defect Disputes in Apartment Building vol.13, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2013.13.5.498
  3. The Defect Diagnosis Process Model Utilizing BPMN Modeling Method in the Apartment Housing vol.26, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2015.26.2.067
  4. Improvement Plans on Defect Consulting Report in an Apartment Building through Analyzing on Formal Index and Quantitative Index vol.14, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2014.14.3.195
  5. Analysis on Legal Issue of Lawsuits and Subjective Judgment on Defects in Apartment Building vol.12, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2012.12.1.042